...except that it is important, because the court again took occasion to say that the practice was not opposed to good morals, because characterized by deception, bad faith, fraud, or oppression, and cited the Orata Cose. And the court said : " The powers of the Commission are limited by the statutes....

...method of competition,' as used in the Act, 'are clearly inapplicable to practices never heretofore regarded as opposed to good morals because characterized...unduly to hinder competition or create monopoly.' * * * If real competition is to continue, the right of the individual to exercise reasonable discretion...

...morals because characterized by deception, bad faith, fraud, or oppression; and (2) methods regarded as against public policy because of their dangerous...tendency unduly to hinder competition or create monopoly. Previous to this decision the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Seventh Circuit, in the Sears-Roebuck...

...methods of "getting the business." From a legal point of view "unfair competition" includes any business practices "regarded as opposed to good morals, because...dangerous tendency unduly to hinder competition or create mpnoply." 30 The practices of "station-stealing," discriminatory prices, lending cream cans, untrue...

...of law, what they include. They are clearly inapplicable to [iractices never heretofore regarded ai opposed to good morals because characterized by deception,...tendency unduly to hinder competition or create monopoly. The act was certainly not intended to fetter free and fair competition as commonly understood and practiced...

...determine as a matter of law what they include. They are clearly inapplicable to practices never heretofore regarded as opposed to good morals, because characterized...deception, bad faith, fraud, or oppression, or as •gainst public policy, because of their dangerous tendency unduly to hinder competition or create...

...determine as a matter of law what they include. They are clearly inapplicable to practices never heretofore regarded as opposed to good morals, because characterized...by deception, bad faith, fraud, or oppression, or tis against public policy, because of their dangerous tendency unduly to hinder competition or create...

...determine as a matter of law what they include. They are clearly inapplicable to practices never heretofore regarded as opposed to good morals, because characterized...tendency unduly to hinder competition or create monopoly. The Act was certainly not intended to fetter free and fair competition as commonly understood and practiced...

...regarded as opposed to good morals because characterized by deOpinion of the Court. 257 US ception, bad faith, fraud or oppression, or as against public...tendency unduly to hinder competition or create monopoly. The act was certainly not intended to fetter free and fair competition as commonly understood and practiced...

...shall trade with one another. It says that fair competitors shall not lend themselves to practices "opposed to good morals, because characterized by...oppression, or as against public policy because of their tendency unduly to prevent competition or create monopoly." Here is a broad general standard which...