Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

189
189
190
191

472
472

212
213
272

419

917-921

890

880-890

248
248

216
216
220

909

263 Assessing fine
223 Assessing fine
292 Assessing fine
224 Assessing fine
235 Assessing fine
291 Assessing fine
242 Dismissing citation
300 Dismissing citation
301 Dismissing citation
303 Dismissing citation
302 Dismissing citation
306 Dismissing citation
307 Dismissing citation
309 Assessing costs
313 Assessing fine ($200.00) (Or-

der omitted)
297 Assessing fine
298 Assessing fine
317 Assessing fine
316 Dismissing citation
296 Dismissing citation
287 Assessing fine
315 L'ismissing citation
326 Assessing fine
ORIENTA-
Griffin vs. C. R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

For depot (pending)
ORLANDO-
Brase vs, A. T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

Telephone in depot

Order 179 therein
OSEUMA-
Frellick vs. St. L. & S. F. R.

R. Co.
For depot
Order No. 333 therein
Appealed to Supreme Court

808/FHILLIPS-
816 Green Vs. M. K. & T. Ry. Co.
824 Complaint for depot
825 Order 110 therein
827 Appealed to Supreme Court.
832 Order of Court affirming
835 Bay vs. M. K. & T. Ry. Co.
836

For agent
837 Order No. 336 therein
839 PHYSICAL TRACK CONNEC-
841

TION-
844

Orders relating to.
845

Aline, Order No. 143
847

Aline, Order No. 142

Geary, Order No. 190
849

Muskogee. Order No. 328
850
852

PIONEER TEL. & TEL, CO.
833

Exchange rates
855 PIPE LINES-
856 Oil & Gas
860 PLATS, ETC. FILED-
874 See Engineering Depart.
877

POCASSETT-
Baird vs. C. R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

Complaint on train service..
492

Adjusted and dismissed
POND CREEK-

Grant County Rural Tel. Co.
290

vs. Pioneer Tel. Co.
290

Asking for Phys'cal Connec-

tions
Order No. 216 therein

Appeal pending
461 POSTAL T. & T. CO. OF
461

TEXAS-

Report
462

(pending)
OVERBROOK-
Bean vs. G. C. & S. F. Ry. Co.

Stops of irains on flag

Dismissed
PACIFIC EXPRESS CO.-

History

Directors
PARK HILL-
Goodrich vs. St. L. & S. F. R.

R. Co.
Asking for agent

Adjusted and dismissed
Henderson vs. St. L. & S. F.

R. R. Co.
Asking for side tracks

Order No. 218 therein
PASSENGER TRAFFIC STA-
TISTICS-

Railway
Rock Island Lines
By States
Summary of roads

Miscellaneous Pass. Rev..
PAULS VALLEY
Worley vs. Hull.

Ice service

Order No. 256 therein
PAWHUSKA-
Stephens vs. Si. L. 1. M. &

S. Ry. Co.
Discourtesy of conductor

Order No. 160 therein
PAYSON-
Duke vs. A, T. & S. F. Ry, Co.
Complaint for telegraph

service
Order No. 92 therein
Appealed to Supreme Court.

Order of Court reversing
PERKINS-
Theronghman vs. Wells Fargo

& Co.
Asking for delivery service..
Dismissed

FOTEAU-
Myrick vs, St. L. & S. F. R.

R. Co.
275

Asking for telegraph service.
275 Order No. 268 therein

POTEAU VALLEY R. R. CO.-
939

Mileage
949 Mileage operated
PROFILES, ETC. FILED-

See Engineering Depart.
PROPOSEL' ORDERS-
456

No.
456

2 Rates on coal and coke

Orders Nos. 9 and 58 therein

3 Demurrage and movement of
331

freight
331

4 Rates on lumber

Orders Nos. 11 and 64 therein

8 Rates on hay and grain
982

Order No. 45 therein
998 7 and 9 Rates on oil
999-1000

Order No. 36 therein
1001 13-16 Express delivery
1002| 18 Telegraph rates

Order No. 149 therein

19 Rules for freight offices
389 Order NO. 141 therein
390 21 Reports of revenues

Order No. 140 therein
22 Reports of accidents

Order No. 148 therein
210

23 Rates on brick, lime, etc.
210

Orders Nos. 55, 115, 157.
25 Rates on fruits and vegeta-

bles
Order No. 63 therein

26 Amending Order No. 9
121

27 Physical railroad connections
121

Order No. 147 therein
122

29 To cancel Order No. 10
122

Order No. 171 therein
30 Rates on cotton and seed

Order No. 99 therein

31 Change of telephone rates
399 Order No. 101 therein
3991 32 Relating to Switching

344
344

890
952

880-890

495
496

498
499
499
504
504
510
510
514
515
515
517
518
519
519
520
520
523
523

526
526
531
532
532
533
533
534
534
538
538

177
177
178
179

221
221

333
333

254

941
952

941
984-1002

353
922

978

709

charges
Order No. 174 therein
63 Rate on hides

Order No. 176 therein
Supreme Court opinion af-

firming
34 To amend Order No. 55
36 Rates on dry goods

Order Nu. 240 therein
37 Amending Order No. 45
38 Inventory telephone plants

Order No. 156 therein
39 Uniform bills of lading
40 Express rates and rules

Order No. 203 therein
41 Cash passenger fares

Order No. 177 therein
42 Rate on culverts
43 Distance tables
44 Amending Order No. 115

Order No. 157 therein
45 Demurrage and storage

Order No. 167 therein
46 Movement of freight

Order No. 168 therein
47 Furnishing cars

Order No. 169 therein
48 Reconsignmen:

Order No. 170 therein
49 Filing documents

53 PURCELL-
539 Wadlington vs. Telephone Co.
539 Complaint charging discrim-
540

ination

Order No. 102 therein
544 Appealed to Supreme Court.
547 Order of Court affirming ..
547

QUAY
547

Coyle vs. A. T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
548

Complaint for telegraph sta-
549

tion
549

Adjusted and dismissed
550
550 QUINLAN-
551

McFadden vs. A. T. & S. F. R.
628

R. Co.
629

Asking for stock yards
631

Order No. 220

McFadden vs. A, T. & S. F.
631
631

Ry. Co.
632

Complaint for stock pens ...
632 RAILROADS-
632

Directors
638

Mileage operated in Okla.
638 Rev, and Exp. in Okla.
641 Statistical Tables
641 Train mileage statistics
644 H'story of Organization
644 Officers and employees in
646

Oklahoma
646 RALSTON-
649 Johnson vs. A. T. & S. F. R.
649

R. Co.
708

Complaint on train service
708 Order No. 232 therein
709
RAMONA-
Frisby vs. A. T. & S. F. Ry.

Co.
710

Asking for telephone in depot
710

Dismissed
711

Frisby Vs. A. T. & S. F. Ry.
711

Co.
711

For telephone in depot
724

Adjusted and dismissed
725
725 RANDOLPH-

Chastain vs. C. R. I. & P. Ry.
726

Co.
726 Complaint on train service
748

Adjusted and dismissed
749 RAY-
750

Hamilton vs. C. R. I. & P. Ry.
750 Asking for depot
751 Dismissed on request
751 RATES-
751 Coal and coke, freight

Lumber, freight
754

Hay and grain, freight

Oil freight
755

Telegraph service
755 Brick, freight

Fruits and vegetables, freight
755

Cotton and cotton seed,
756

Freight
756 Change of
757 Switching
759

Hides, freight
759 Dry goods, freight

Express
760
REAMS-

Cook vs. M. K. & T. Ry. Co.
761

Asking shelter over platform
761

Dismissed on request
761

RED BIRD
761 Campbell vs. M. K. & T. Rv.
762

Co.

Asking for depot
762

Order No. 266 therein
762 RED OAK-

Smallwood vs. C. R. I. & P.

Ry. Co.
426 For stop of trains
427 Adjusted and dismissed

335
335

351
351

Order No. 198 therein
50 Accounting rules

Order No. 201 therein

Supreme Court opinion
51 To amend Order No. 63

Order No. 209 therein
52 To inquire if roads are un-

der same control
Order No. 205 therein
53 To amend Order No. 208
54 For train connections
55 General offices

Order No. 265 therein
56 Sleeping car rates

Order No. 267 therein
57 Indices for tariffs (pending)
58 Annual report Western Un-

ion
Order No. 236 therein
59 Rules-Long and short haul

Order No. 246 therein
60 Exact change

Order No. 320 therein
61 Telephone rates (pending)
62 Filing express tariffs

Order No. 321 therein
63 Filing mileage tables (pend-

ing)
64 Inquiring if roads under same

control
Order No. 252 therein
65 Union depot, Tupelo (pend-

ing)
66 Amendment of Order No. 153

Order No. 340 therein
67 Excess baggage rate
68 Cancellation of Order No. 177

Order No. 342 therein
69 Redemption of tickets (pend-

ing)
70 Opening train exits (pend-

ing)
71 Class and commodity rates..
72 Switching rates (pending)
73 Exemption from rate orders

(pending)
74 Location maps (pending)
75 Printing fares on tickets

(pending)
76 Wire crossings (pending)
PRYOR CREEK-
Fisher vs. M. K. & T. Ry. Co.

Asking for train stops
Order No. 282 therein

456
456

248
248

435
435

496
499
504
510
515
523
526

534
538
539
540
547
549

302
302

416
416

454
454

Co.

RENTIESVILLE-

SANIZ
Cookzey vs. M. K. & T. Rv. Co.

See brick,
Asking for depot

259

SAPULFA-
Order 172 therein

259

Glascock vs. St. L. & S. F. R.
REFORTS-

R. Co.
Orders requiring

For street crossing (pending) 492
494, 519, 520, 549, 646, 649, 726, 751 Crawford vs. St. L. & S. F.
REVENUES AND EXPENSES-

Ry. Co.

951
Railways in Oklahoma

257
Complaint for street crossing
Adjusted and dismissed

257
RENTIESVILLE-

SAPULPA &
Bynum vs. M. K. & T. Ry. Co.

INTERURBAN

452 RY. CO.-
Asking for depot

452
Adjusted and dismissed

History

937
Directors

948
RINGWOOLS

Fiscal statistics

976
Watkins vs. C. R. I. & P. Ry.
Co.

SEMINOLE-
For “rain service

457 Hoffman vs. M. K. & T. Ry.
457

Co.
Dismissed, no prosecution

Change name of station

252
RIPLEY

Adjusted and dismissed

252
Smith ys. A. T. & S. F. R. R.

SENTINEL-
Additional train service

337 Simpkins vs. K. C. M. & O.
Consolidated with No. 410

337
Ry. Co.

456
Mayre vs. A. T. & S. F. Ry.

For telephone in depot
Co.

Adjusted and dismissed

456
Complaint for telephone in

SEWARD-

259
depot

McMillen vs. C. R. I. & P. Ry.
Dismissed

259

Co.
ROCKY-

For depot platform

451
Lee vs. St. L. & S. F. R. R.

Dismissed

451
Co.

Dilley vs. A. T. & S. F. Ry. Co. 270

453 Dismissed
For depot facilities

270
Pending for adjustment

453 SHAWNEE-TECUMSEH TRAC-
ST. L. & S. F. R. R. CO.-

TION CO.-
883
History

938
Plans, etc. filed

883
Directors

948
Mileage

952
Fiscal statistics

975
Mileage operated in Okla.
History

934|SHIPPING FACILITIES-
Directors

9451 Orders relating to.
Revenues
and expenses in
Hitchita, Order 173

197
Oklahoma

951 SKEDEE-
Train mileage statistics

953

Myers vs. A. T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
Fiscal statistics

968

Complaint for telephone in
Passenger traffic statistics.. 982

depot

135
Freight traffic statistics

983
Order No. 83 therein

135
Statistical comparison with

Appealed to Supreme Court.. 137
roads outside Oklahoma. 984-987

Order of Court affirming.... 137
ST. L. E. R. & W. RY.-

SOPER-
History

929 Williams vs. Pioneer Telephone
Directors

942

Co.
Fiscal statistics

959 Asking for physical connec-
Revenues and

expenses
in

tion
Oklahoma
951 Dismissed, no prosecution

391
Train mileage statistics

953 SO. COFFEYVILLE-
Mileage operated in Okla.

952

Etchen vs. St. L. I. M. & S. Ry.
Passenger traffic statistics.

982

Co. et al.
Freight traffic statistics.

983
Asking for Union depot

414
ST. L. 1. M. & S. RY. CO.-

Order No. 308 therein

414
Plans, etc. filed

887|SO. COLD SPRINGS-
Mleage

887 Granthorn vs. S:. L. & S. F.
Mileage operated in Okla.

952

R. R. Co.
History
931 Asking for depot

311
Directors
945 Consolidated with 390

311
Revenues and expenses in

SPAULDING-
Oklahoma

951

McPherson Vs. St. L. & S. F.
Train mileage statistics

953

Ry. Co.
Fiscal statistics

967
Complaint for depot

264
Passenger traffic statistics..

Order 182 therein

264
Freight traffic statistics

983
Statistical comparison with

STAR SCHOOL HOUSE-
roads outside Okla.

990-993

Bierman vs. M, K. & T.

Complaint for stops of trains 300
SALLISAW-

Adjusted and dismissed

309
Kelleam vs. St. L. 1. M. &

STATION FLATS, ETC.
S. R. R. Co.

FILED-
For cattle guards

483
Heard and closed (pending). 483 See Engineering Depart. 880-890

STECKER-
SAN BOIS-

Green vs. C. R. I. & P.
Hill Vs. Midland Valley.

Station and shipping facil-
Complaint for depot

302
ities

215
Dismissed on request
302 Order 165 therein

215

391

982

STILLWATER-
Gray vs. S.. L. & S. F. Ry. Co.

Lighting of trains

Adjusted and dismissed
STOCK YARD' FACILITIES-
Orders relating to.

Foraker, Order No. 204

Quinlan, Order No. 220
STONE-

See brick.
STRATFORD
Lee vs. 0. C. Ry. Co.

Asking for daily local freight

Adjusted and dismissed
STREET CAR FARES-
Orders relating to.

Tecumseh, Order No. 253

Tulsa, Order No. 237 .:::
STROUD-
Jarrett vs. St. L. & S. F. R.

R. Co.
Complaint for stops of trains
Adjusted and dismissed
SHULTZ vs. St. L. & S. F.

R. R. Co.
Telephone in depot

Adjusted and dismissed
STEWART-
Citizens vs. C. R. I. & P. Ry.

Co.
For agent

Adjusted and dismissed
STILWELL-
Fletcher vs. K. C. S. Ry. Co.
Asking facilities
Dismissed on request

...::
STILWATER-
Smith vs. A. T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

Asking for larger depot
Order No. 260 therein
Appealed to Supreme Court

(pending)
SULPHUR-
Bailey vs. Electric Light Co.

For better rates
Bowman vs. A, T. & S. F. Ry.

Co. et al.
Asking for physical connec-

tions
Pending
SUMNER-
Gin

VS. Western Union
Tel. Co. et al.
Asking for telegraph service.

Settled by agreement
SWITCHING CHARGES-

Order relating to
SWITCHES, SIDE TRACKS

AND SPURS-
Orders relating to,

Apache, Order No. 59
Ames, Order No. 184
Bluejacket. Order No. 258
Carnegie, Order No. 84
Dacoma, Order No. 128
Fort Cobb, Order No. 85
Goodwin, Order No. 186
Jones Spur, Order No. 258

Park Hill, Order No. 218
TAHLEQUAH-
Palmtag ys. Wells Fargo & Co.

Complaint for express office.

Adjusted and dismissed
TALIHINA-
McGowan vs. St. L. & S. F. R.

R. Co.
For train stops

Adjusted and dismissed
TANEHA-

Sharp vs. Wells Fargo & Co.

Asking for express office

413
Adjusted and dismissed

413
257 Yoder vs. St. L. & S. F. R. R.
257

Co.
Asking removal of depot

417
Ordered removed

417
255 Hardy vs. St. L. & S. F. R. R.
333

Co.
Asking for train stops

429
Adjusted and dismissed

429
TANGIER-

Zimmerman vs. A. T. & S. F.
345

Ry. Co.

For crossing
345

478
Order 329 therein

478
Thomas vs. A. T. & S. F. Ry.

Co.
222 For stock pens (pending)
375

488
TARIFFS-
Required to be filed

494
Required to be filed

646
Required to be filed
309

751
TECUMSEH-
309
Henderson VS. Shawnee Te.

cumseh Traction Co.

Reduction in fares
305

222
Order No. 253 therein
305

222
Blickensderfer

V3.

Tecumseh
Telephone Co.
Asking for night service

406
Dismissed on request

406
462

TELEGRAPH SERVICE-
462

Orders relating to.
Coalgate, Order No. 295

408
Ferguson, Order No. 86

156
417
Gans, Order No. 238

303
417
Jennings, Order No. 77

117
Miami, Order No. 195

255
Mazie, Order No. 257

386
406 Norge, Order No. 324

434
406 Payson, Order No. 95

122
TELEGRAPH RATES

515
407 TELEPHONE-

Character of reports required 895
Companies not reporting

892
453
Department

894
Plant replacement and cost.. 895
Plants, cost and replacement 897-908
Rates, Pioneer local

917-921
408

Rates, local except Pioneer.. 911-916
408
TELEPHONE SERVICE-
Orders relating to.
Casey, Order No. 273

346
Cestos, Order No. 261
395

347
295
Checotah, Order No. 138

224
Crescent, Order No. 164

279
Duke, Order No. 146

247
539
El Reno, Order No. 284

422
Enia, Order No. 44

167
Maramac, Order No. 285

329
Marshall, Order No. 195

265
110 Mayfield Order No. 271

393
240 Mooreland, Order No. 249

349
383 Okeene, Order No. 145

225
175 Orlando, Order No. 179

290
199 Purcell, Order No. 102

177
173 Skedee, Order No. 83

135
274 Thomas, Order No. 251

384
383 Union City, Order No. 163

253
331 Union City, Order No. 230

320
Union City. Order No. 284

422
Welch, Order No. 247

382
259 Yukon, Order No. 163

253
259 TEXHOMA-

Sanford vs. C. R. I. & P. Ry.

Co.
For night agent (pending)...

486
480 TEXOLA-
480
Howard ys. C. R. I. & P. Ry.

Co.
Complaint for depot

272

Co.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

Order No. 162 herein
THOMAS-
Bronson vs. St. L. & S. F. R.

R. Co.
Asking for track connections
Dismissed
Commercial Club Vs. K. C.

M, & O. Ry. Co.
Asking for telephone in de-

pot
Order No. 251 therein
Commercial Club vs. St. L. &

S. F. R. R. Co.
Asking for telephone in depot
Telephone installed, dis-

missed
THOMASVILLE-
Freeman vs. K. C. S. Ry. Co.

Complaint for agent

Dismissed on request
McWhinney vs. K. C. S. Ry.

Co.
Asking for agent

Adjusted and dismissed
TIAWAH-
Leonard vs. St. L. I. M. & S.

Asking for depot

Dismissed on request
Leonard vs. St. L. 1. M. & S.

Ry. Co.

For depot (pending)
TISHOMINGO-
Brennan vs. Ice & Cold Stor-

age Co.
Charging discrimination

Order No. 210 therein
TONKAWA-
Farmers Mutual Telephone Co.

vs. Telephone Co.
For physical connection

Adjusted and dismissed
TRAIN MILEAGE STATIS-
TICS-

Railways in Oklahoma ...
TRAIN SERVICE AND STOPS-
Orders relating to.

Adair, Order No. 229
Belva, Order No. 290
Cameron. Order No. 243
Cordell, Order No. 175
Davenport, Order No. 319
Edmond, Order No. 196
Fitzhugh. Order No. 188
Foyil, Order No. 281
Hanson, Order No. 294
Muskogee, Order No. 189
Fryor Creek, Order NO. 282..
Ralston, Order No. 232
Troy, Order No. 234
Valley, Order No. 166
Wakita, Order No. 286
Wellston, Order No. 334
Westville, Order No. 189
Witcher, Order No. 180
Bulletining trains, Order No.

374
375
376
376

302

30.

197

197

2721

Heard and closed (pending)..
TULSA-
Fry vs. Midland Valley R. R.

Co.
331

For spur
321 Adjusted and dismissed
Rohde vs. Pioneer Tel. & Tel.

Co.

For reduction in rates (pend-
384

ing)
384 Harnage vs. St. L. & S. F. R.

R. Co.

For viaduct (pending)
385 Harnage vs. M. K. & T. Ry. Co.

For viaduct (pending)
385 Grimes vs. St. L. & S. F. R.

R. Co.

For viaduct (pending)
268 Foultz Vs. Pioneer Tel. & Tel.
268

Co.
For adjustment of rates

Adjusted and dismissed
430 Holland vs. Street Railway Co.
430 For extension of service

Adjusted and dismissed

Shoefstall vs. Osage & Oklaho-
308

ma Co.
308

Asking for gas service (pend-

ing)
McClurg vs. Street Railway Co.
462

Asking for extension of

service
Order No. 237 therein
Appealed to Supreme Court.

Order of Court affirming
352

Riese vs. Wells Fargo & Co.
353

Delivery service

Dismissed on request
Brady vs. M. K. & T. Ry. Co.

Complaint on demurrage rate
437 Dismissed for want of prose-
437

cution
TULSA ST. RY. CO.-

History
953 Directors

Fiscal statistics
UNION CITY-
339 Arnold vs. Union City Tele-
397 phone Co.
392 Asking for connections
279 Order No. 230 therein
459 UNITED STATES EXP. CO.-
277

History
260

Directors
431

UPSON-
400

Seters vs. St. L. I. M. & S. Ry.
296

Co.
427

For track facilities (pend.
335

ing)
318
251 VALLEY-
438

Clark vs. St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co.
463 Complaint flag station
296

Order 166 therein
244 VEGETABLES-

See fruits.
494 VERDIGRIS-
518

Grimes vs. St. L. & S. F. R.

R. Co.
Asking for stop of trains

Order No. 229 therein
471 İVERA-
471

Bank vs. A. T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
Complaint for telegraph serv-

ice

Order No. 215 therein
318

VIAN-
318

Town vs. Missouri Pacific Ry.
319

Co.
319

Asking for crossings

Order No. 269 therein
VICKERS
484 Bracken vs. St. L. & S. F. Ry.

938
949
977

319
320

939
950

491

250
251

338
339

Discontinuing, Order No. 141
TROUSDALE-
Livvix vs. Purcell Telephone

Co.
For interchange of service...

Heard and closed (pending).
TROY-
Burnett vs. St. L. & S. F. Ry.

Co.
Complaint for stops of trains
Order No. 234 therein
Appealed to Supreme Court..

Order of Court affirming....
TRYON-
Cox vs. M. K. & T. Ry. Co.
For private crossing

292
292

824

324

« AnteriorContinuar »