The Federal Antitrust Laws with AmendmentsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1922 - 158 páginas |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 29
Página 5
... Union of America et al . . 135 Burroughs Adding Machine Co. et al . 92 Button Export & Trading Corporation et al . 115 California Associated Rasin Co. et al .. 122 Cassidy ... 58 Cement Manufacturers Protective Association et al . 129 ...
... Union of America et al . . 135 Burroughs Adding Machine Co. et al . 92 Button Export & Trading Corporation et al . 115 California Associated Rasin Co. et al .. 122 Cassidy ... 58 Cement Manufacturers Protective Association et al . 129 ...
Página 8
... Union Pacific Coal Co. et al . . Union Pacific R. R. Co. et al .. United Gas Improvement Co. et al .. United Shoe Machinery Co ......... . United States Steel Corporation et al . Victor Talking Machine Co ... . . . . Virginia - Carolina ...
... Union Pacific Coal Co. et al . . Union Pacific R. R. Co. et al .. United Gas Improvement Co. et al .. United Shoe Machinery Co ......... . United States Steel Corporation et al . Victor Talking Machine Co ... . . . . Virginia - Carolina ...
Página 57
... Union and forty - nine individual defendants with mails and interstate commerce carried by all railroads operat- ing in Indiana . An injunction was issued on July 3 , 1894 , which was continued in force until September 19 , 1898 , when ...
... Union and forty - nine individual defendants with mails and interstate commerce carried by all railroads operat- ing in Indiana . An injunction was issued on July 3 , 1894 , which was continued in force until September 19 , 1898 , when ...
Página 58
... Union . " The trial resulted in a disagreement of the jury on April 6 , 1895 , and a nolle prosequi was entered on July 1 , 1895 . United States v . Moore . Indictment returned November 4 , 1895 , against the members of an association ...
... Union . " The trial resulted in a disagreement of the jury on April 6 , 1895 , and a nolle prosequi was entered on July 1 , 1895 . United States v . Moore . Indictment returned November 4 , 1895 , against the members of an association ...
Página 69
... Union Pacific Coal Company et al . In- dictment returned November 20 , 1907 , in the District Court for the District of Utah , charging a conspiracy to maintain a monopoly in the sale of coal . On March 2 , 1908 , a demurrer was ...
... Union Pacific Coal Company et al . In- dictment returned November 20 , 1907 , in the District Court for the District of Utah , charging a conspiracy to maintain a monopoly in the sale of coal . On March 2 , 1908 , a demurrer was ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
agreement alleged association Attorney charging a combination charging defendants charging the defendants Chicago Circuit Court coal combination and conspiracy combination in restraint combining and conspiring common carrier conspiracy to restrain conspiring to restrain Court of Appeals decree granting decree was entered defendants with combining defendants with entering Demurrer Demurrer overruled dismissed District Court enjoining February 11 fendants final decree fines aggregating imposed Indictment returned Indictment returned April Indictment returned June individual defendants injunction interstate commerce July June 29 Lumber manufacture and sale March 14 monopolize interstate trade N. D. of Illinois nolle prosequi nolo contendere November October Peti Petition filed December Petition filed February Petition filed June Petition filed March Portland Cement remaining defendants restrain and monopolize restraint of interstate restraint of trade selling Sherman Antitrust Act Supreme Court Terra Cotta thereof tion filed trade and commerce trial United unlawful verdict of guilty violation York
Pasajes populares
Página 13 - An act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies...
Página 41 - It shall be the duty of the various district attorneys, under the direction of the Attorney General of the United States, to prosecute for the recovery of forfeitures.
Página 15 - That any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found or has an agent, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee.
Página 52 - The costs and expenses of such prosecution shall be paid out of the appropriation for the expenses of the courts of the United States.
Página 14 - That it shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to lease or make a sale or contract for sale of goods, wares, merchandise, machinery, supplies, or other commodities, whether patented or unpatented...
Página 16 - ... instituted for the purposes of mutual help, and not having capital stock or conducted for profit, or to forbid or restrain individual members of such organizations from lawfully carrying out the legitimate objects thereof; nor shall such organizations, or the members thereof, be held or construed to be illegal combinations or conspiracies in restraint of trade, under the antitrust laws.
Página 39 - The commission may order testimony to be taken by deposition in any proceeding or investigation pending under this Act at any stage of such proceeding or investigation. Such depositions may be taken before any person designated by the commission and having power to administer oaths.
Página 30 - If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Act shall, for any reason, be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered.
Página 39 - ... or to produce documentary evidence if so ordered, or to give evidence touching the matter in question; and any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by such court as a contempt thereof.
Página 10 - ... person who shall be injured in his business or property by any other person or corporation by reason of anything forbidden or declared to be unlawful by this act, may sue therefor in any circuit court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the costs of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. SECTION 8. That the word "person,