Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

stantial competition between the company owning the branch line so constructed and the company owning the main line acquiring the property or an interest therein, nor to prevent such common carrier from extending any of its lines through the medium of the acquisition of stock or otherwise of any other such common carrier where there is no substantial competition between the company extending its lines and the company whose stock, property, or an interest therein is so acquired.

Nothing contained in this section shall be held to affect or impair any right heretofore legally acquired: Provided, That nothing in this section shall be held or construed to authorize or make lawful anything heretofore prohibited or made illegal by the antitrust laws, nor to exempt any person from the penal provisions thereof or the civil remedies therein provided.

SEC. 8. . . . That from and after two years from the date of the approval of this Act no person at the same time shall be a director in any two or more corporations, any one of which has capital, surplus, and undivided profits aggregating more than $1,000,000, engaged in whole or in part in commerce, other than banks, banking associations, trust companies, and common carriers subject to the Act to regulate commerce, approved February fourth, eighteen hundred and eightyseven, if such corporations are or shall have been theretofore, by virtue of their business and location of operation, competitors, so that the elimination of competition by agreement between them would constitute a violation of any of the provisions of any of the antitrust laws. The eligibility of a director under the foregoing provision shall be determined by the aggregate amount of the capital, surplus, and undivided profits, exclusive of dividends declared but not paid to stockholders, at the end of the fiscal year of said corporation next preceding the election of directors, and when a director has been elected in accordance with the provisions of this Act it shall be lawful for him to continue as such for one year thereafter.

When any person elected or chosen as a director or officer or selected as an employee of any bank or other corporation subject to the provisions of this Act is eligible at the time of his election or selection to act for such bank or other corporation in such capacity his eligibility to act in such capacity shall not be affected and he shall not become or be deemed amenable to any of the provisions hereof by reason of any change in the affairs of such bank or other corporation from whatsoever cause, whether specifically excepted by any of the provisions hereof or not, until the expiration of one year from the date of his election or employment.

SEC. 11. That authority to enforce compliance with sections two, three, seven, and eight of this Act by the persons respectively subject thereto is hereby vested: In the Interstate Commerce Commission where applicable to common carriers, in the Federal Reserve Board where applicable to banks, banking associations and trust companies, and in the Federal Trade Commission where applicable to all other character of commerce, to be exercised as follows:

Whenever the commission or board vested with jurisdiction thereof shall have reason to believe that any person is violating or has violated any of the provisions of sections two, three, seven, and eight of this Act, it shall issue and serve upon such person a complaint stating its charges in that respect, and containing a notice of a hearing upon a day and at a place therein fixed at least thirty days after the service of said complaint. The person so complained of shall have the right to appear at the place and time so fixed and show cause why an order should not be entered by the commission or board requiring such person to cease and desist from the violation of the law so charged in said complaint. Any person may make application, and upon good cause shown may be allowed by the commission or board, to intervene and appear in said proceeding by counsel or in person. The testimony in any such proceeding shall be reduced to writing and filed in the office of the commission or board. If upon such hearing the commission or board, as the case may be, shall be of the opinion that any of the provisions of said sections have been or are being violated, it shall make a report in writing in which it shall state its findings as to the facts, and shall issue and cause to be served on such person an order requiring such person to cease and desist from such violations, and divest itself of the stock held or rid itself of the directors chosen contrary to the provisions of sections seven and eight of this Act, if any there be, in the manner and within the time fixed by said order. Until a transcript of the record in such hearing shall have been filed in a circuit court of appeals of the United States, as hereinafter provided, the commission or board may at any time, upon such notice and in such manner as it shall deem proper, modify or set aside, in whole or in part, any report or any order made or issued by it under this

section.

If such person fails or neglects to obey such order of the commission or board while the same is in effect, the commission or board may apply to the circuit court of appeals of the United States, within any circuit where the violation complained of was or is being committed or where such person resides or carries on business, for the enforcement of its order, and shall certify and file with its applica

tion a transcript of the entire record in the proceeding, including all the testimony taken and the report and order of the commission or board. Upon such filing of the application and transcript the court shall cause notice thereof to be served upon such person and thereupon shall have jurisdiction of the proceeding and of the question determined therein, and shall have power to make and enter upon the pleadings, testimony, and proceedings set forth in such transcript a decree affirming, modifying, or setting aside the order of the commission or board. The findings of the commission or board as to the facts, if supported by testimony, shall be conclusive. If either party shall apply to the court for leave to adduce additional evidence, and shall show to the satisfaction of the court that such additional evidence is material and that there were reasonable grounds for the failure to adduce such evidence in the proceeding before the commission or board, the court may order such additional evidence to be taken before the commission or board and to be adduced upon the hearing in such manner and upon such terms and conditions as to the court may seem proper. The commission or board may modify its findings as to the facts, or make new findings, by reason of the additional evidence so taken, and it shall file such modified or new findings, which, if supported by testimony, shall be conclusive, and its recommendation, if any, for the modification or setting aside of its original order, with the return of such additional evidence. The judgment and decree of the court shall be final, except that the same shall be subject to review by the Supreme Court upon certiorari as provided in section two hundred and forty of the Judicial Code.

Any party required by such order of the commission or board to cease and desist from a violation charged may obtain a review of such order in said circuit court of appeals by filing in the court a written petition praying that the order of the commission or board be set aside. A copy of such petition shall be forthwith served upon the commission or board, and thereupon the commission or board forthwith shall certify and file in the court a transcript of the record as hereinbefore provided. Upon the filing of the transcript the court shall have the same jurisdiction to affirm, set aside, or modify the order of the commission or board as in the case of an application by the commission or board for the enforcement of its order, and the findings of the commission or board as to the facts, if supported by testimony, shall in like manner be conclusive.

The jurisdiction of the circuit court of appeals of the United States to enforce, set aside, or modify orders of the commission or board shall be exclusive.

Such proceedings in the circuit court of appeals shall be given precedence over other cases pending therein, and shall be in every way expedited. No order of the commission or board or the judgment of the court to enforce the same shall in any wise relieve or absolve any person from any liability under the antitrust Acts.

Complaints, orders, and other processes of the commission or board under this section may be served by anyone duly authorized by the commission or board, either (a) by delivering a copy thereof to the person to be served, or to a member of the partnership to be served, or to the president, secretary, or other executive officer or a director of the corporation to be served; or (b) by leaving a copy thereof at the principal office or place of business of such person; or (c) registering and mailing a copy thereof addressed to such person at his principal office or place of business. The verified return by the person so serving said complaint, order, or other process setting forth the manner of said service shall be proof of the same, and the return postoffice receipt for said complaint, order, or other process registered and mailed as aforesaid shall be proof of the service of the same.

Approved, October 15, 1914.

INDEX OF CASES

Abbott & Co., A. Theo., F.T.C. v. (1 F.T.C.D. 16). . . . . . 86, 183.
Accounting Machine Co., Inc., F.T.C. v. (3 F.T.C.D. 361)..202.
Adams & Co., John R., F.T.C. v. (3 F.T.C.D. 209).....119, 219.
Aeolian Co., F.T.C. v. (3 F.T.C.D. 124)..
Ainsworth v. Walmsley (L.R. 1 Eq. Cas. 518).

.145, 161, 215.

..177.

..183.
.145, 323.

.85, 204.

Akron Tire Co., Inc., F.T.C. v. (2 F.T.C.D. 119)...146, 195, 225.
Alamance Hosiery Mills, F.T.C. v. (5 F.T.C.D. 230).
Albany Chemical Co., F.T.C. v. (3 F.T.C.D. 369).
Alben-Harley, F.T.C. v. (4 F.T.C.D. 31).
Allen Sales Service, Inc., F.T.C. v. (1 F.T.C.D. 459).
Aluminum Co. of America, F.T.C. v. (3 F.T.C.D. 302).....319.
American Agricultural Chemical Co., F.T.C. v. (1 F.T.C.D.

226)...

.160.

...111, 119, 144, 255, 318.
American Column Co. v. United States (257 U.S. 377)......81.
American Hosiery Co., F.T.C. v. (3 F.T.C.D. 1) . . . . . . .155, 183.
American Mutual Seed Co., F.T.C. v. (3 F.T.C.D. 177)....186.
American Printers' Roller Co., F.T.C. v. (1 F.T.C.D. 244)

118, 218, 224.

American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnulty (187

..208.

U.S. 94).....
American Tobacco Co. v. United States (221 U.S. 106). . . . . . .4.
American Turpentine Co., F.T.C. v. (5 F.T.C.D. 410) ......227.
American Washboard Co. v. Saginaw Mfg. Co. (103 Fed.

281)...

Anchor Electric Co. v. Hawkes (171 Mass. 101).

179.

Anderson v. United States (171 U.S. 604) . .

.39.

Armour & Co., F.T.C. v. (1 F.T.C.D. 430)..

.14.

Armour & Co., F.T.C. v. (4 F.T.C.D. 457).

.226.

Atlanta Wholesale Grocers et al., F.T.C. v. (4 F.T.C.D. 466)

Association of Flag Mfrs. of America et al., F.T.C. v. (1
F.T.C.D. 55)....

Armstrong Cork Co. v. Ringwalt Linoleum Works (235
Fed. 458)..

..320.

.180.

.322.

284.

.182.

Atlas Knitting Co., F.T.C. v. (2 F.T.C.D. 264)...
Atteaux & Co., Inc., F. E., F.T.C. v. (2 F.T.C.D. 82)...119, 219.
Aunt Jemima Mills Co. v. Rigney & Co. (247 Fed. 407)....178.
Auto Strop Safety Razor Co., F.T.C. v. (1 F.T.C.D. 418)

113, 300.

« AnteriorContinuar »