Decisions of the Federal Maritime Commission, Volumen27The Commission, 1984 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 100
Página vi
... Benefit of General Motors Corporation Application of Lykes Bros. Steamship Co. , Inc. , for the Benefit of Wilhelm Schleef GMBH & Co. KG . 848 844 Application of Pacific Westbound Conference and Sea - Land Service , Inc. for the Benefit ...
... Benefit of General Motors Corporation Application of Lykes Bros. Steamship Co. , Inc. , for the Benefit of Wilhelm Schleef GMBH & Co. KG . 848 844 Application of Pacific Westbound Conference and Sea - Land Service , Inc. for the Benefit ...
Página vii
... Benefit of Page 871 871 222 21 572 891 Pascoe Building Systems v . Pacific Westbound Conference and American President Lines , Ltd. 572 Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company ; Dr. Ethel M. Hepner v . Peruvian Amazon Line ...
... Benefit of Page 871 871 222 21 572 891 Pascoe Building Systems v . Pacific Westbound Conference and American President Lines , Ltd. 572 Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company ; Dr. Ethel M. Hepner v . Peruvian Amazon Line ...
Página ix
... Benefit of United Brands for Chiquita International Trading Co. Application of Lykes Bros. Steamship Co. , Inc. for the Benefit of Wilhelm Schleef GMBH & Co. KG . 560 135 844 SD - 1206 Application of Sea - Land Service , Inc. for the ...
... Benefit of United Brands for Chiquita International Trading Co. Application of Lykes Bros. Steamship Co. , Inc. for the Benefit of Wilhelm Schleef GMBH & Co. KG . 560 135 844 SD - 1206 Application of Sea - Land Service , Inc. for the ...
Página 8
... benefits , without explicitly rejecting REL's contentions regarding its tackle- to - tackle tariff . Respondents argue on exceptions that REL has failed to meet its burden of proof and that its arguments on issues such as its tackle ...
... benefits , without explicitly rejecting REL's contentions regarding its tackle- to - tackle tariff . Respondents argue on exceptions that REL has failed to meet its burden of proof and that its arguments on issues such as its tackle ...
Página 9
... benefits conferred . As REL notes in its Exceptions , the issue under section 17 is " whether the charge reflects a fair allocation of terminal costs based on the comparative benefits derived by the charged party's actual use of the ...
... benefits conferred . As REL notes in its Exceptions , the issue under section 17 is " whether the charge reflects a fair allocation of terminal costs based on the comparative benefits derived by the charged party's actual use of the ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
action Administrative Law Judge agency amended application assessment agreement assessment formula Atlantic bill of lading cargo certification charges co-loading Commission's complaint consignees container containerized costs determination documents effective employee essential terms evidence exception exemption Federal Maritime Commission filing party Final Rule Freight Conference freight forwarder Government Hapag-Lloyd Hearing Counsel Information Form Initial Decision Interim Rule intermodal issue labor license Maersk Line man-hour marine terminal Massport ment MLAA modification notice NVOCC NYSA NYSA/ILA ocean common carriers paragraph person petition Port Authority presiding officer PRMSA PRMSA/PRMMI procedures proceeding Puerto Rican record regulations request respondent Sea-Land Sea-Land Service service contract shipments shippers Shipping Act sion Special Docket specific statement submitted Subpart surety bond TAMPA PORT AUTHORITY tariff terminal operator time/volume tion tonnage assessment tonnage formula trade transportation transshipment United vessel violation waiver warehouse checking YORK SHIPPING ASSOCIATION York/New Jersey
Pasajes populares
Página 244 - Errors and irregularities occurring at the oral examination in the manner of taking the deposition, in the form of the questions or answers, in the oath or affirmation, or in the conduct of parties and errors of any kind which might be obviated, removed, or cured if promptly presented, are waived unless reasonable objection thereto is made at the taking of the deposition.
Página 228 - Every party shall have the right to present his case or defense by oral or documentary evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence, and to conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
Página 239 - Rule 31. Depositions of Witnesses Upon Written Interrogatories. (a) SERVING INTERROGATORIES; NOTICE. A party desiring to take the deposition of any person upon written interrogatories shall serve them upon every other party with a notice stating the name and address of the person who is to answer them and the name or descriptive title and address of the officer before whom the deposition is to be taken.
Página 241 - ... of the truth of any matters within the scope of Rule 26(b) set forth in the request that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law to fact, including the genuineness of any documents described in the request.
Página 244 - The introduction in evidence of the deposition or any part thereof for any purpose other than that of contradicting or impeaching the deponent makes the deponent the witness of the party introducing the deposition, but this shall not apply to the use by any other party of a deposition as described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
Página 193 - ... (b) PROCEDURES. — After notice required by this section, the agency shall afford interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making through submission of written data, views, or arguments with or without opportunity to present the same orally in any manner...
Página 245 - ... or any other designated facts shall be taken to be established for the purposes of the action in accordance with the claim of the party obtaining the order; (2) An order refusing to allow the disobedient party to support or oppose designated claims...
Página 244 - Objections to the competency of a witness or to the competency, relevancy, or materiality of testimony are not waived by failure to make them before or during the taking of the deposition, unless the ground of the objection is one which might have been obviated or removed if presented at that time.
Página 240 - Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath, unless it is objected to, in which event the reasons for objection shall be stated in lieu of an answer. The answers are to be signed by the person making them, and the objections signed by the attorney making them. (3) The party upon whom the interrogatories have been served shall serve a copy of the answers, and objections if any, on all parties to the proceeding under the schedule established pursuant to §502.201.
Página 295 - Disclose investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes, or information which, if written, would be contained in such records, but only to the extent that the production of such records or information would (1) interfere with enforcement proceedings...