Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal LawOxford University Press, USA, 2008 M01 8 - 231 páginas In the US, one out of every 138 residents is incarcerated. The size of the prison population has quadrupled since 1980. Approximately 2.4% of Americans are either on probation and parole -- the US has the highest rate of criminal punishment in the Western world. The problem with American criminal law, as many see it, is that there is simply too much of it. Recent years have seen a dramatic expansion in the amount of criminal statutes and in the resulting reliance on punishment for convictions under those laws. The author argues that this is regrettable for several reasons, but most importantly, he says that much of the resulting punishment is unjust, excessive, and disproportionate. He also claims that it is destructive to the rule of law and undermines the principle of legality. The author's goal in this book is to formulate a normative theory of criminalization that will allow us to distinguish which criminal laws are justified, and which are not--something he sees as essential in order to reverse the trend towards too many criminal laws. The first part of this book makes the case that there is both too much criminal law and too much punishment, and clarifies the relationship between the two using empirical data. Examples are provided of dubious criminal laws enacted by legislatures, in particular statutes on drugs possession and guns. The latter part of the book develops the theory, which establishes principles that should set limits (both external and internal to the criminal law) on what we can and should criminalize. |
Contenido
1 The Amount of Criminal Law | 3 |
2 Internal Constraints on Criminalization | 55 |
3 External Constraints on Criminalization | 120 |
4 Alternative Theories of Criminalization | 178 |
Table of Cases | 207 |
Bibliography | 209 |
225 | |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
alleged ancillary offenses apply behavior believe benefit Cambridge commentators commit conduct constitutional construed courts crimes criminal codes criminal justice criminal law Criminal Law Review criminal liability criminal sanction criminal statutes criminal theory culpability defendant defined definition deserve difficulty Douglas Husak enact example federal final find first H. L. A. Hart harm or evil harm principle hybrid offense identified illicit drug implications imposed inchoate offenses inflicted infringe interest intermediate scrutiny internal constraints Joel Feinberg justified justify legal moralists legal philosophers legislatures mala malum malum in se Model Penal Code nontrivial harm normative objective offenses of risk overcriminalization overinclusive Oxford University Press penal sanction persons problem prohibit proscribe proscriptions prosecutors question rationale reason requirement retributive justice risk prevention Rodriguez satisfied sentence significant specific strict liability substantial substantive criminal law sufficient suppose theorists theory of criminalization tion ultimate harm unjustified unless utilitarian violate wrongfulness constraint