Pacific Coast Steamship Company, Bank of San Luis Obispo v... 594 People v. Wells 563 193 631 People ex rel. Schwartz v. Temple People's Home Savings Bank v. Superior Court Robinson v. Exempt Fire Company of the City of San Francisco 1 San Francisco and North Pacific R. R. Co., Stevens v. 252 Stevens v. San Francisco and North Pacific R. R. Co.... 252 Stockton Combined Harvester and Agricultural Works v. Houser, 377 Stokes, People v. 193 Stone, Morrison v. 94 CASES NOT REPORTED. 19254 Barclay v. Severance. The evidence being substantially conflicting. Judgment and order affirmed Boehm v. Gibson. Upon a review of the evidence, held, that there was no irregularity in the proceedings of the trial court warranting a new trial, and no accident or surprise which ordinary prudence could not have guarded against. Judgment and order affirmed. 19285 Brickell v. Board of Supervisors. Judgment reversed on the author. ity of Wulzen v. Board of Supervisors, 101 Cal. 15 Bullion and Exchange Bank v. Spooner. Judgment affirmed upon a record of the evidence ............ 15027 18192 ...... Burr v. Navarro Mill Co. Appeal dismissed for failure to file transcript 15576 ...... Castro v. San Francisco. Order dismissing the action for want of ordinary diligence affirmed Chadbourne v. Stockton Savings and Loan Society. Judgment and order refusing a new trial reversed upon a review of the evidence... 18173 Chase v. High. Judgment modified on the authority of Clemens v. Luce, 101 Cal. 432 15029 19249 Cooper v. McCarthy. Judgment modified on the authority of Clemens v. Luce, 101 Cal. 432 19264 Curtis v. Underwood. Judgment and order affirmed on the authority of Curtis v. Underwood, 101 Cal. 661.. Davis v. Eames. Judgment and order affirmed upon a review of the evidence 19284 .... Decker v. Perry. Complaint held not to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and judgment reversed 19266 Donnells v. Martin. Judgment and order affirmed. 15465 Dooley v. Seventeen Thousand and Five Hundred Head of Sheep. 19199 Ex parte Lippman. Petitioner discharged on the authority of Ex parte ...21044, 21045 Ferguson v. McBean. Judgment and oiler affirmed upon a review of the evidence Gould v. Monroe. Judgment and order affirmed on the authority of 19218 Johnson v. Johnson. Judgment for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty affirmed, after a review of the evidence and an examination of the pleadings 15275 Lee v. McCarthy. Judgment modified upon the authority of Clemens v. Luce, 101 Cal. 432 19302 ..... ..... McDonald v. Southern California Ry. Co. Judgment and order re- 19309 19627 Natoma Water and Mining Co. v. Hancock. Appeal dismissed from an order adjudging a defendant guilty of contempt, on the ground that the order is not appealable Ogden v. Packard. Judgment and order affirmed.... 14624 19306 ..... People v. Bell. (Three cases.) Judgment convicting the defendant of robbery affirmed, on the authority of People v. Douglass, 100 Cal. 1. ...21051, 21052, 21053 People v. Clement. Order for an arrest of judgment affirmed, upon the authority of People v. DeCourcey, 61 Cal. 124; and People v. Tervise, 56 Cal. 396 People v. Cornwell. Judgment and order reversed on the authority of People v. Bannister, 34 Pac. Rep. 710.. People v. Davis. Judgment and order affirmed upon a review of the evidence and the specifications of error...... People v. Strybe. Judgment and order reversed for error in the instructions 21031 ....... Raskin v. Robarts. Appeal from the interlocutory order dismissed, and order denying a new trial affirmed, upon a review of the evidence 19263 Riehl v. San Jose. Order affirmed on the authority of Riehl v. San Russ Lumber and Mill Co. v. Roggen Kamp. Judgment affirmed upon the authority of Bates v. Santa Barbara Co., 90 Cal. 543.. 19242 Sainsevain v. Luce. Judgment modified on the authority of Clemens v. Luce, 101 Cal. 432 19274 San Joaquin Land and Water Co. v. Bilding order affirmed on the authority of San Joaquin Land and Water Co. v. Beecher, 101 Cal. 70 Spooner v. Cady. Judgment and order reversed with leave to the defendant to annul his answer 18191 Stewart v. Dunlap. Judgment affirmed 18183 Tibbets v. Bakewell. Judgment and order affirmed....... 19162 Usher v. Usher. Judgment reversed on the authority of Warner v. Watterson v. Saldunbehere. Judgment and order affirmed upon a review of the evidence 18172 Young v. Trierweiler. Appeal dismissed 19373 |