...its temporizing with a recognized evil, should fairly face the one alternative which is presented. There is no question of national dignity, be it remembered, involved in the treatment of savages by a civilized power. With wild men, as with wild beasts, the question •whether in a given situation...

...its temporizing with a recognized evil, should fairly face the one alternative, which is presented. There is no question of national dignity, be it remembered, involved in the treatment of savages by a civilize^ power. With wild men, as with wild beasts, the question whether in a given situation one...

...protected and fed, and such as went wrong should be harassed and scourged without intermission . . . There is no question of national dignity, be it remembered, involved in the treatment of savages by a civilized power. With wild men, as with wild beasts, the question whether in a given situationoneshall...

...and allows the freest development of our settlements and railways possible under the circumstances. There is no question of national dignity, be it remembered, involved in the treatment of savages by a civilized power." . . . I do not agree with Mr. Walker even on the ground of the " highest expediency...

...and allows the freest development of our settlements and railways possible under the circumstances. There is no question of national dignity, be it remembered, involved in the treatment of savages by a civilized power." . . . I do not agree with Mr. Walker even on the ground of the " highest expediency...

...set forth In the following excerpts from the 1S72 Kcport of Commissioner of Indian Affairs Walker : "There is no question of national dignity, be It remembered, Involved in the treatment of savages by a civllized power. With wlld men. as with wlld beasts, the question whether In a given situation one...

...set forth In the following excerpts from the 1872 Report of Commissioner of Indian Affairs Walker : "There Is no question of national dignity, be It remembered, involved in the treatment of ravagea by a civilized power. With wild men. as with wild beasts, the question whether in a given situation...

...1952 Myer had thus made his own the basic principle of Commissioner Walker's policy in 1872: WALKER: There is no question of national dignity, be it remembered, involved in the treatment of savages by a civilized power. [See my discussion in chapter 9.] MYER: Agreement with the affected Indian groups...

...Indian Affairs, described his policy regarding the treatment of American Indians. According to Walker, There is no question of national dignity, be it remembered, involved in the treatment of savages by a civilized power. With wild men, as with wild beasts, the question whether in a given situation one...

...and allows the freest development of our settlements and railways possible under the circumstances. There is no question of national dignity, be it remembered, involved in the treatment of savages by a civilized power." . . . I do not agree with Mr. Walker even on the ground of the " highest expediency...