The Federal Antitrust Laws with AmendmentsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1923 - 182 páginas |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 21
Página 73
... agreed prices in the sale of lumber . Pleas of guilty were entered September 25 , 1907 , and fines aggregating $ 2,000 were imposed and collected . United States v . National Association of Retail Druggists et al . Petition filed May 9 ...
... agreed prices in the sale of lumber . Pleas of guilty were entered September 25 , 1907 , and fines aggregating $ 2,000 were imposed and collected . United States v . National Association of Retail Druggists et al . Petition filed May 9 ...
Página 83
... agreed decree was entered October 17 , 1911 , perpetually enjoining the association , its officers and members , from doing any and all of the acts com- plained of . See case number 70 , page 99 . United States v . Great Lakes Towing ...
... agreed decree was entered October 17 , 1911 , perpetually enjoining the association , its officers and members , from doing any and all of the acts com- plained of . See case number 70 , page 99 . United States v . Great Lakes Towing ...
Página 85
... agreed upon between counsel , and was entered by the court on October 12 , 1911 . 21 . United States v . Purrington et al . Indictment returned September 14 , 1910 , in the Northern District of Illinois , charging defendants with ...
... agreed upon between counsel , and was entered by the court on October 12 , 1911 . 21 . United States v . Purrington et al . Indictment returned September 14 , 1910 , in the Northern District of Illinois , charging defendants with ...
Página 103
... agreed decree was entered at Rochester on May 27 , 1913 . United States v . White et al . Indictment returned June 7 , 1913 , in the District Court , Southern District of West Virginia , against 19 members of the United Mine Work- ers ...
... agreed decree was entered at Rochester on May 27 , 1913 . United States v . White et al . Indictment returned June 7 , 1913 , in the District Court , Southern District of West Virginia , against 19 members of the United Mine Work- ers ...
Página 104
... agreed to meet the demands of the Government , and a decree sustain- ing the petition was entered on March 26 , 1914 . United States v . Reading Company et al ( anthracite coal combination ) . Petition filed September 2 , 1913 , in the ...
... agreed to meet the demands of the Government , and a decree sustain- ing the petition was entered on March 26 , 1914 . United States v . Reading Company et al ( anthracite coal combination ) . Petition filed September 2 , 1913 , in the ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
alleged American association cement charging a combination charging defendants charging the defendants Chicago Circuit Court coal combination and conspiracy combination in restraint combining and conspiring commission Company conspiracy in restraint conspiring to restrain Court of Appeals December 16 decision decree granting decree was entered defendants with combining defendants with entering Demurrer Demurrer overruled dismissed District Court District of Illinois Eastern District enjoining February 11 final decree fines aggregating Government was handed imposed Indictment returned Indictment returned June individual defendants jobbers June 29 lumber monopolize interstate trade Nolle prosequi entered nolo contendere Northern November October October 17 Peti Petition filed Petition filed December Petition filed February Petition filed July Railroad remaining defendants restrain and monopolize restrain interstate trade restraint of interstate restraint of trade selling Sherman Antitrust Act Southern District stockyard Supreme Court Terra Cotta tion filed trade and commerce United United States District unlawful violation York
Pasajes populares
Página 1 - An act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies...
Página 29 - It shall be the duty of the various district attorneys, under the direction of the Attorney General of the United States, to prosecute for the recovery of forfeitures.
Página 3 - That any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found or has an agent, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee.
Página 39 - The costs and expenses of such prosecution shall be paid out of the appropriation for the expenses of the courts of the United States.
Página 2 - That it shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to lease or make a sale or contract for sale of goods, wares, merchandise, machinery, supplies, or other commodities, whether patented or unpatented...
Página 22 - ... in that respect and containing a notice of a hearing upon a day and at a place therein fixed at least thirty days after the service of said complaint. The person, partnership, or corporation so complained of shall have the right to appear at the place and time so fixed and show cause...
Página 28 - ... or who shall willfully destroy, mutilate, alter, or by any other means or device falsify the record of any such account, record, or memoranda, or who shall willfully neglect or fail to make full, true, and correct entries...
Página 2 - ... unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly, to discriminate in price between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality...
Página 26 - ... any documentary evidence of any corporation being investigated or proceeded against; and the commission shall have power to require by subprena the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of all such documentary evidence relating to any matter under investigation.
Página 27 - No person shall be excused from attending and testifying or from producing documentary evidence before the commission or in obedience to the subpoena of the commission on the ground or for the reason that the testimony or evidence, documentary or otherwise, required of him may tend to incriminate him or subject him to a penalty or forfeiture.