(2) That nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent differentials which make only due allowance for differences in the cost of manufacture, sale, or delivery resulting from the differing methods or quantities in which such commodities are to such purchasers sold or delivered;

NOTE 1: Cost justification under subparagraph (2) of this paragraph depends upon net savings in cost based on all facts relevant to the transactions under the terms of such subparagraph. For example, if a seller regularly grants a discount based upon the purchase of a specified quantity by a single order for a single delivery, and this discount is justified by cost differences, it does not follow that the same discount can be cost justified if granted to a purchaser of the same quantity by multiple orders or for multiple deliveries.

NOTE 2: In determining whether a price differential based on cost savings under subparagraph (2) of this paragraph is warranted there shall be taken into account any portion of the goods involved which are returned by the customer-purchaser to the seller for credit or refund. See also Note 2 under paragraph (e) of this section.

(3) That nothing contained in this section shall prevent persons engaged in selling goods, wares, or merchandise in commerce from selecting their own customers in bona fide transactions and not in restrain of trade;

(4) That nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent price changes from time to time where made in response to changing conditions affecting the market for or the marketability of the goods concerned, such as but not limited to obsolescence of seasonal goods, distress sales under court process, or sales in good faith in discontinuance of business in the goods concerned;

(5) That nothing contained in this section shall prevent the meeting in good faith of an equally low price of a competitor.

NOTE: Subsection (b) of section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended, reads as follows: "Upon proof being made, at any hearing on a complaint under this section, that there has been discrimination in price or services or facilities furnished, the burden of rebutting the prima facie case thus made by showing justification shall be upon the person charged with a violation of this section, and unless justification shall be affirmatively shown, the Commission is authorized to issue an order terminating the discrimination: Provided, however, That nothing herein contained shall prevent a seller rebutting the prima facie case thus made by showing that his lower

price or the furnishing of services or facilities to any purchaser or purchasers was made in good faith to meet an equally low price of a competitor, or the services or facilities furnished by a competitor."

(b) Examples of prohibited price differential practices. The following are examples of price differential practices to be considered as subject to the prohibitions of paragraph (a) of this section when involving goods of like grade and quality which are sold for use, consumption, or resale within any place under the jurisdiction of the United States, and which are not purchased by schools, colleges, universities, public libraries, churches, hospitals, or charitable institutions not operated for profit, as supplies for their own use, and when:

(1) The commerce requirements specified in paragraph (a) of this section are present; and

(2) The price differential has a reasonable probability of substantially lessening competition or tending to create a monopoly in any line of commerce, or of injuring, destroying, or preventing competition with the industry member or with the customer receiving the benefit of the price differential, or with customers of either of them; and

(3) The price differential is not justified by cost savings (see paragraph (a) (2) of this section); and

(4) The price differential is not made in response to changing conditions affecting the market for or the marketability of the goods concerned (see paragraph (a) (4) of this section); and

(5) The lower price was not made to meet in good faith an equally low price of a competitor (see paragraph (a) (5) of this section).

EXAMPLE 1. At the end of a given period an industry member grants a discount to a customer equivalent to a fixed percentage of the total of the customer's purchases during such period and fails to grant a discount of the same percentage to other customers on their purchases during such period.

EXAMPLE 2. An industry member sells goods to one or more of his customers at a higher price than he charges other customers for like merchandise. It is immaterial whether or not such discrimination is accomplished by misrepresentation as to the grade and quality of the products sold.

(c) Prohibited brokerage and commissions. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to pay or grant, or to receive

or accept, anything of value as a commission, brokerage, or other compensation, or any allowance or discount in lieu thereof, except for services rendered in connection with the sale or purchase of goods, wares or merchandise, either to the other party to such transaction or to an agent, representative, or other intermediary therein where such intermediary is acting in fact for or in behalf, or is subject to the direct or indirect control, of any party to such transaction other than the person by whom such compensation is so granted or paid.

(d) Prohibited advertising or promotional allowances, etc. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce to pay or contract for the payment of advertising or promotional allowances or any other thing of value to or for the benefit of a customer of such member in the course of such commerce as compensation or in consideration for any services or facilities furnished by or through such customer in connection with the processing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of any products or commodities manufactured, sold, or offered for sale by such member, unless such payment or consideration is made known to and is available on proportionally equal terms to all other customers competing in the distribution of such products or commodities.

NOTE 1: Industry members giving advertising allowances to competing customers must exercise precaution and diligence in seeing that all of such allowances are used in accordance with the terms of their offers. NOTE 2: When an industry member gives allowances to competing customers for advertising in a newspaper or periodical, the fact that a lower advertising rate for equivalent space is available to one or more, but not all, such customers, is not to be regarded by the industry member as warranting the retention by such customer or customers of any portion of the allowance for his or their personal use or benefit.

(e) Prohibited discriminatory services or facilities. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce to discriminate in favor of one purchaser against another purchaser or purchasers of a commodity bought for resale, with or without processing, by contracting to furnish or furnishing, or by contributing to the furnishing of, any services or facilities con

nected with the processing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of such commodity so purchased upon terms not accorded to all competing purchasers on proportionally equal terms.

NOTE 1: Subsection (b) of section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended, which is set forth in the note concluding paragraph (a) of this section is applicable to this paragraph.

NOTE 2: Among the practices prohibited by this paragraph is that of an industry member according to one or more customers the privilege of returning for credit or refund any or all of the goods purchased by them and failing to accord the same privilege to another or other competing customers on proportionally equal terms. In this connection see also Note 2 under cost justification proviso (paragraph (a)(2) of this section).

(f) Inducing or receiving an illegal discrimination in price, advertising or promotional allowances, or services or facilities. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, knowingly to induce or receive a discrimination in price, advertising or promotional allowances, or services or facilities, prohibited by the foregoing provisions of this section. [Rule 19]

§ 61.20 Exclusive dealing.

It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to lease, contract to sell or sell any industry product, or fix a price charged therefor, or discount from, or rebate upon, such price, on the condition, agreement, or understanding that the lessee or purchaser thereof shall not use or deal in the products of a competitor or competitors of such industry member, where the effect of such sale or contract for sale, or of such condition, agreement, or understanding, may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce. [Rule 20] § 61.21

Tie-in sales-coercing purchase of one product as a prerequisite to the purchase of other products. The practice of coercing the purchase of one or more products as a prerequisite to the purchase of one or more other products, where the effect may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly or unreasonably to restrain trade, is an unfair trade practice. [Rule 21]

motive parts" and "automotive assemblies" as herein used mean any part or assembly designed for an automobile, truck, motorcycle, tractor or similar self-propelled vehicle. Industry products include, but are not limited to, armatures, generators, starters, carburetors, clutches, distributors, connecting rods, crankshafts, cylinder blocks, engine assemblies, fuel pumps, brakes, master and wheel brake cylinders, power brakes, shock absorbers, starter drives, solenoids, automatic transmissions, regulators, spark plugs, springs, windshield wiper motors and water pumps. Automobile tires are not products of the industry.

§ 62.1 Deception as to previous use of products.

(a) It is an unfair trade practice to represent, directly or by implication, that any industry product is new or unused, or that any part of an industry product is new or unused when such is not the fact, or to misrepresent the extent of previous use thereof.

(b) It is an unfair trade practice for an industry member to offer for sale or

sell any industry product unless a clear and conspicuous disclosure that such product has been used or contains used parts is made in all the industry member's advertising, sales promotional literature and invoices concerning the product, on the container in which the product is packed and, if the product has been rebuilt, remanufactured, reconditioned or has the appearance of being new, on the product with sufficient permanency to remain thereon after installation for a reasonable period of time under ordinary conditions of use, and in such manner that said disclosure cannot be easily removed or obliterated.

(1) Form of disclosure. The disclosure that an industry product has been used or contains used parts as required by this section may be made by use of a word such as, but not limited to, "Used," "Secondhand," "Repaired," "Remanufactured," "Reconditioned," "Rebuilt," or "Relined," whichever is applicable to the product involved. On invoices to the trade only the disclosure required by this section may be made by use of any number, mark, or other symbol which is clearly understood by all purchasers receiving such invoices as meaning that the products, or parts thereof, identified on the invoices have been used.

(2) Conspicuousness of disclosure. The disclosure required by this section shall be of such size or color contrast and so placed as to be readily noticeable to purchasers or prospective purchasers reading advertising, sales promotional literature, or invoices containing same, or reading any representation as to content on the container in which an industry product is packed, or inspecting an industry product before installation, or with a minimum of disassembly after installation.

(c) It is an unfair trade practice to place any means or instrumentality in the hands of others whereby they may mislead purchasers or prospective purchasers as to the previous use of industry products or parts thereof. [Rule 1] § 62.2 Deception as to identity of rebuilder, remanufacturer, reconditioner or reliner.

(a) It is an unfair trade practice to misrepresent the identity of the rebuilder, remanufacturer, reconditioner or reliner of an industry product.

(b) In connection with the sale or offering for sale of an industry product

if the identity of the original manufacturer of the product, or the identity of the manufacturer for which the product was originally made, is revealed and the product was rebuilt, remanufactured, reconditioned or relined by other than the manufacturer so identified, it is an unfair trade practice to fail to disclose such fact wherever either of said manufacturers is identified in advertising and sales promotional literature concerning the product, on the container in which the product is packed, and on the product, in close conjunction with, and of the same permanency and conspicuousness as, the disclosure of previous use of the product required by this section. Examples of disclosures considered to be in compliance with the requirements of this section are as follows:

(1) Disclosure of the identity of the rebuilder as, for example:

(b) It is an unfair trade practice to use the words "Rebuilt," "Remanufactured," or words of similar import, as descriptive of an industry product which, since it was last subjected to any use, has not been dismantled and reconstructed as necessary, all of its internal and external parts cleaned and made free from rust and corrosion, all impaired, defective or substantially worn parts restored to a sound condition or replaced with new, rebuilt1 or unimpaired used parts, all missing parts replaced with new, rebuilt1 or unimpaired used parts, and such rewinding or machining and other operations performed as are necessary to put the industry product in sound working condition.

(c) It is an unfair trade practice to represent an industry product as "Factory Rebuilt" unless the product was rebuilt as described in paragraph (b) of this section at a factory generally engaged in the rebuilding of such products. (See also § 62.2) [Rule 3]

Rebuilt for XYZ Motors

[Rule 21

64.103

64.104

(a) It is an unfair trade practice to use, or cause or promote the use of, any statement or representation in advertising, on containers, on industry products, or elsewhere, which has the capacity and tendency or effect of misleading or deceiving purchasers or prospective purchasers as to the condition of an industry product, or the extent that an industry product has been repaired or reconstructed.

Fictitious bids.

Bid "shopping" condemned.

Standards of calls for bids.

Identical information to all bidders. Publication of price lists and terms. of sale.

Definition.

Cost accounting.

Arbitration.

1 In accord with the provisions of this para-graph (b).

64.106

64.107

64.108

64.109

64.110

64.111

64.112

64.113

66-033-67-22

The inducing or attempting to induce an architect, owner, or builder to reveal to any bidder on a competitive job information relative to bids already received, which information would give the favored bidder an advantage in the preparation of his own bid, is condemned by the industry.

§ 64.103 Solicitation of information with a view to price cutting.

To induce or attempt to induce an architect, owner, or builder to reveal to a bidder the amounts and conditions of any bid received on a competitive job, with a view of giving the favored concern an opportunity to meet or cut below the lowest bid, whether the favored concern was one of the original bidders or not, is condemned by the industry. § 64.104 Deception in bidding.

To mislead or deceive any bidder as to the amounts and conditions of other bids or with any other false information for the purpose of inducing him to cut his own is condemned by the industry.