4 NOAA's Regional General Counsel Offices develop the guidelines for the fisheries in their regions and submit them for review and approval by headquarters. The guidelines are tailored to the characteristics of the particular regional fisheries, with input from NMFS, Coast Guard, and the relevant Fishery Management - Councils. The penalty must be fair, yet provide for sufficient deterrence that is, it must represent more than just a cost of doing business. Ordinarily the guidelines provide the flexibility necessary to reflect all relevant factors, including those which the Magnuson Act requires to be considered. The single most important factor is the respondent's violation history. Both aggravating and mitigating circumstances, are also factored in, as is the value of the catch and whether or not the catch was seized. NOAA's procedural rules address consideration of a respondent's ability to pay the penalty assessed. See 15 CFR 904.108. The respondent is responsible for supplying the financial information necessary to make this determination. То aid in this purpose, NOAA attorneys provide respondents with simplified financial forms. Each region also utilizes "summary settlement schedules." For certain minor, first-time violations, the enforcement agent may issue summary settlements to alleged violators based upon lower fixed penalty amounts for specified violations on the "schedule." A person issued a summary settlement form may, within 20 days, elect either to pay the summary settlement amount or to wait for ATTACHMENT 1 Data Requested by the Committee on the Judiciary Other Enforcement Actions During the year beginning July 1, 1991, the following enforcement actions were taken: 1. Violations documented by enforcement officers: 3,020 cases [3,925 counts] [This includes violations documented by all sources: Coast Guard, NMFS, and deputized State officers.] 2. Written warnings issued: 598 cases [811 counts] [This figure includes written warnings issued by field officers, regional enforcement offices and by NOAA General Counsel enforcement attorneys. It does not include verbal warnings: no records are kept.] 3. Cases referred to NOAA General Counsel for civil penalty prosecution: 1,266 cases Notices of Violation and Assessment (NOVAs): 770 [1,366 counts] Notices of Permit Sanction (NOPS) (other than for Forfeitures: 36 federal district court cases 236 cases of property forfeited by settlement Criminal referrals: 95 cases The data refers to the number of a particular type of enforcement action taken during the period. For instance, while 3020 violations were documented and 598 written warnings issued during this period, the 598 written warnings may include violations documented before July 1, 1991. A "case" may involve more than one violation ("count"). Where appropriate (and data available), the number of both "cases" and "counts" is given. 2 5. Civil penalty cases dismissed or settled without request for hearing: Cases dismissed or downgraded to warnings, prosecutions 957 cases [1,328 counts] declined: [This includes actions taken by either NMFS Enforcement or NOAA GC.] Cases settled by NOAA GC: 453 cases [695 counts] 6. Number of hearing requests: 299 cases (268 letters of request). 7. Number of hearings held: 43 cases [The cases involved 56 separate counts and, since the Judge 8. Number of cases where penalty proposed in the NOVA sustained by the ALJ: 25 cases (33 counts) 9. Number of cases where penalty proposed in the NOVA was reduced by the ALJ: 14 cases (17 counts) 10. Number of cases where penalty proposed in the NOVA was increased by the ALJ: 1 case (1 counts) 11. Number of cases dismissed by the ALJ: 3 cases (5 counts) 12. Number of cases where the ALJ's decision was overturned by the NOAA Administrator: 25 cases were appealed to the NOAA Administrator. The penalty was sustained in 23 of those cases and reduced in 2. The Administrator also ruled against the Agency in 44 (related) cases, upholding the ALJ's dismissal of those cases with prejudice against the Agency. 10324 Federal Register / Vol. 52, No. 61 / Tuesday, March 31, 1987 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric 15 CFR Part 904 50 CFR Parts 219 and 621 [Docket No. 41157-6187) Civil Procedure Regulations AGENCY: National Oceanic and ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: NOAA publishes final EFFECTIVE DATE: March 31, 1987. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. These regulations revise and New Subpart A of Part 904 sets forth the scope of the regulations, defines a number of terms used throughout the Part, and consolidates procedures governing the filing and service of documents that were previously scattered throughout Subparts B through E. "Permit holder" and "vessel owner" are defined and used throughout the regulations; the definitions for "affected permit" and "affected vessel" are deleted since the terms are no longer used. In § 904.3(a) (former 904.100(b)(1)). language was added to state that service of a document is 904.100(b)(1) and 904.220(d)). 904.100(b)(2)) to exclude Saturdays, Subpart C governs the conduct of added that whenever possible. interpreters used at hearings should be certified by the federal courts. Section 904.262 is former § 904.263, and adds paragraph (c) on retention of physical evidence by other than the ALJ. Paragraph (c) was added to § 904.270 (Record of decision) to clarify that posthearing exhibits are not part of the record unless specifically admitted. Section 904.272 (Petition for reconsideration) is the former § 904.261; the time to reply to a petition for reconsideration is increased from 10 to 15 days. Section 904.273 is the former 904.272, with additions. In paragraph (d), a sentence is added specifying that no new evidence may be submitted on review. In paragraph (f), the time to reply was increased from 21 to 30 days. Paragraph (h) was amended to specify that the Administrator, if he grants a petition for review, must allow briefs to be filed before deciding the case. Paragraph (i) was added on service and -the effective date of the Administrator's decision. Subpart D covers procedures for permit sanctions and denials for enforcement-related reasons. Section 904.306 was deleted due to a revised delegation of authority within NOAA that makes permit sanction proceedings parallel with civil penalty proceedings. This means the ALJ will now issue an Initial Decision, which will be subject to discretionary review by the Administrator of NOAA. In § 904.322. the standard for interim action was modified to "protect" marine resources instead of to "prevent substantial harm" to the resources. Subpart E governs the issuance, review, and appeal of written warnings. Section 904.403 (former § 904.420) was amended so that a written warning issued by an enforcement agent may be appealed first to a Regional Attorney, then to the Assistant General Counsel for Enforcement and Litigation (AGC/ EL); however, a written warning issued by a Regional Attorney (or Staff attorney) may be appealed directly to the AGC/EL Subpart F provides procedures for the disposition of seized property. One revision permits a certified check to be used instead of a bond when a person files a claim for seized property (§ 904.504(b)(3)(ii)). New § 904.508 is the former Subpart C of 50 CFR Part 219. and governs the disposal of forfeited or abandoned property. Response to Public Comments Public comments were received when Subparts D and E were first published in |