c. 19. s. 13. Lovelock d. Norris v. Dancuster, Mich. 31 Geo. 3. 122 7. When a rule to set aside proceedings for irregularity, and to stay proceed- ings in the mean time, is obtained, the proceedings are suspended for all purposes till the rule is disposed of. Swayne v. Crammond, Hil. 31 Geo. 3. 176 8. And therefore the time for putting in bail remains the same after the rule is discharged, as it was when it was grant- ed. ib. 9. On a rule to plead, reply, &c. in four days, if the party on whom the rule is made delay complying with it till the morning of the fifth day, the adverse party may refuse to receive it, and sign juigment. Thomson v. Ryall, Hil. 31 Geo. 3.
11. After demurrer to a declaration of two counts against two defendants, be- cause one of them was not named in the last count, the plaintiff cannot enter a nol. pros. on that count, and proceed on the other. Drummond v. Dorant, Trin. 31 Geo. 3. 360 12. Plaintiff cannot sign judgment for the defendant's refusing to pay 4d. for the warrant of an attorney when the copy of the declaration is delivered to him. Oneale v. Price, Trin. 31 Geo. 3. 370 13. If defendant, after craving oyer of a deed, do not set forth the whole deed, the plaintiff may sign judgment as for want of a plea; or the Court will quash the plea. Wallace v. The Duchess of Cumberland, Trin. 31 Geo. S.
370 14. Where the defendant, in an action
of debt on bond, after craving_oyer, and setting it out truly, pleaded pay- ment, on which the plaintiff took issue, and served defendant's attorney with a rule to abide, &c. and gave
notice of trial; and afterwards de- fendant returned the paper-book, set- ting out a false oyer of the bond, and pleading as before, on which plaintiff enrolled the true condition, and de- murred; the Court ordered all the pleadings to be struck out, and that plaintiff should have judgment, and that the defendant's attorney should pay all the costs. Ferguson v. Mackreth, Hil. 24 Geo. 3. B. R. cited. 370, 1 15. Where the action is by original, the defen lant has till four days after the quarto die post to put in bail. Frampton v Barber, Trin. 31 Geo. 3. 16. Where any sheriff before his going out of office shall arrest any defendant,. and a cepi corpus be returned, he may within the legal time allowed be called upon to bring in the body, though he may be out of office before such rule be granted. Reg. Gen. Trin. 31 Geo.
17. Trying a feigned issue without the consent of the Court, is a contempt of the Court; and after such a trial they will stay the proceedings. Hoskins v. Lord Berkeley, Mich. 32 Geo. 3. 402 18. The Court will not set aside a de- fendant's execution for the costs of a nonsuit sued out after allowance of a writ of error, because the writ of error can only be for delay. Kempland v. Macauley, Mich. 32 Geo. 3.
19. If a record be ever so erroneous, the plaintiff, who has made default, by suffering a nonsuit, can never have a judgment afterwards in his favour.
ib. 20. Where defendant's attorney in effect told the plaintiff that the writ of error was brought for delay, the Court re- fused to stay proceedings pending it. Law v. Smith, Mich. 30 Geo. 3. B. R. 436, n.
21. The same on a similar declaration by one of the bail. Evans v. Gilbert, Trin. 31 Geo. 3. B. R. ib. 22. When a defendant, who has suf- fered judgment by default in a cri- minal prosecution, is brought up for judgment, each party should come prepared with affidavits disclosing his own case [if he mean to produce any affidavit at all]; but if in the course
INDEX TO THE PRINCIPAL MATTERS.
of the inquiry the Court wish to have any point further explained, they will give the defendant an opportunity of answering it on a future day. R. v. Wilson, Mich. 32 Geo. 3. 487 23. The defendant having suffered judg- ment by default in an action of as- sumpsit on a foreign judgment, the Court would not refer it to the Mas- ter to see what was due, and give the plaintiff leave to enter up final judgment for such sum, without exe- cuting a writ of inquiry. Messin v. Lord Massareene et Üx. Mich. 32 Geo.
32 Geo. 3. 27. All writs must be returned by the sheriff on the day on which the rule for returning the same expires; and in default thereof the plaintiff is at li- berty to move for an attachment on the next day. Reg. Gen. Mich. 32 Geo. 3. 496 28. The defendant in ejectment is enti- tled to the general reply, where the plaintiff claiming by descent proves his pedigree and stops, and the defendant sets up a new case in his defence, which is answered by evidence on the part of the plaintiff. Goodtitled. Re- vett v. Braham, Trial at bar, Hil. 32 Geo. 3. 497 29. If one of several defendants reside within 40 miles of London, it is not necessary to give the ten days' notice of trial required by 14 Geo. 2. c. 17. s. 3. Per Ashhurst, J. in Perry v. Jackson, Hil. 32 Geo. 3. 520 30. When a declaration is delivered be- fore the essoign-day of a term, with a rule to plead in the four first days of that term, the defendant cannot plead within that time in abatement
without a special imparlance. Doughty v. Lascelles, Hil. 32 Geo. 3. 520 31. The venue was in London, and ver- dict for plaintiff without defence, which was set aside, because only eight days' notice of trial was given, the defendant residing in India. Douglas v. Ray, Hil. 32 Geo. 3. 552
S2. If a plea be demanded on a Saturday, the defendant has twenty-four hours to plead after the demand, exclusive of Sunday. Solomons v. Freeman, Hil. 32 Geo. 3.
557 33. If issue in a London cause be joined early enough in a term to enable the plaintiff to give notice of trial for the sittings after that term, the defendant is not entitled to judgment as in case of a nonsuit for not proceeding to trial, unless the plaintiff has in fact given notice of trial. Mont v. Tremamondo, Hil. 32 Geo. 3.
34. Where several persons have sepa- rately incurred penalties for printing illegal schemes of the lottery, a se parate affidavit must be made and filed against each of them; and if they be all joined in one affidavit, the irregularity is not waved by their put- ting in bail: but the Court, on motion, will stay the proceedings against all of them. Goodwin, q. t. v. Parry, Hil. 32 Geo. 3.
577 35. If a plea be filed before the bail are perfected, it is a nullity, and does not become a good plea by perfecting the bail afterwards. Venn v. Calvert, Hil. 32 Geo. 3.
578 36. On every appointment by the Master, the party served shall attend such appointment without waiting for a second; otherwise the Master shall proceed ex parte on the first ap- pointment. Reg. Gen. Hil. 32 Geo. 3.
580 37. A scire facias must lie in the sheriff's office the last four days before the re- turn. Forty v. Hermer, E. 32 Geo. 3.
583 38. A bill of Middlesex may be returnable the same day that it is sued out. Ox- lade v. Davidson, E. 32 Geo. 3. 610 39. The defendant in an information on 24 Geo. 3. c. 26. s. 64. must make his application for a mandanus for the examination of witnesses within
No. 8; Costs, No. 1, 2, 7; Insolvent, No. 2, 3; Notice.
the four first full days, if at all, after plea pleaded. R. v. Holland, E. 32 Geo. 3.
40. When there is only one scire facias against bail, and the proceedings are
by bill, there need be only four days See Extent; Rates, No. 3.
exclusive between the teste and return
of it. Bell v. Jackson, E. 32 Geo. 3.
PRESUMPTION.
See Marriage, No. 1, 3.
41. When a prisoner pleads, he must give See Custom; Pleading, No. 4, 5, 16, 17, the plaintiff notice of his plea. Thomas v. Pritchard, E. 32 Geo. 3. 664 42. If a plaintiff do not proceed to trial or judgment, within three terms against the defendant (a prisoner), the latter is not entitled to be discharged until the expiration of the third term. ib. 43. If an action be brought on a judg- ment, which is irregular, the whole proceedings may be set aside in one rule. Barlowe v. Kaye, E. 32 Geo. 3. 688 44. Judgment as in case of a nonsuit may be given in a traverse of a return to a mandamus. R. v. The Mayor, &c. of Stafford, E. 32 Geo. 3. 689
In the case of a plain trust, where the trustees are directed to convey to a devisee on his attaining 21, the jury may be directed to presume a con- veyance at any time afterwards, though considerably less than 20 years. Eng- land d. Syburn v. Slade, Ě. 32 Geo. 3. 682
See Devise, No. 14, 15; Marriage, No. 1, 3; Outlawry, No. 9.
47. The Court will not stay the proceed- ings till the plaintiff, a foreigner, give security for the costs, unless the de- fendant have put in bail. De la Preuve See Arrest. v. The Duc de Biron, E. 32 Geo. 3. 697
48. The Court will permít a defendant to carry a record of an issue, directed by Chancery, down to trial, on a sug- gestion, that the plaintiff intends to de- lay it. Humpage v. Rowley, Trin. 32 Geo. 3.
767 See Affidavit, No. 3, 5, 6, 7; Attorney, No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6; Bills of Exchange,
1. The Prize Courts and Courts of Lords Commissioners of Appeals, have the sole and exclusive jurisdiction over the question of prize or no prize, and who are the captors, notwithstanding any of the prize acts; and if they pro- nounce a sentence of condemnation, adjudging also who are the captors,
QUO WARRANTO, Information in nature of.
1. An application for a q. w. informa-
tion made on the affidavits of several persons, of whom all but one have consented to the election proposed to be impeached, may be granted on the affidavit of that one, if he avow him- self to be the relator. R. v. Symmons, E. 31 Geo. 3.
Upon a question concerning the vali- dity of an election to a vacant fellow- ship made by the fellows of Trinity- Hall, Cambridge, which was disputed by the Master, the Court held, that an information in nature of quo warranto would not lie; but thought the proper remedy in such case was by mandamus, or by an action brought by the fellow appointed by the Master to try his right. R. v. Gregory, E. 12 Geo. 3. 240, n. 3. Where leave have been granted by the Court to file an information in nature of quo warranto against a party for claim- ing to be common-council-man of York, and the relator by his replication at- tacked also the defendant's title as free- man, which had been stated in the in- troductory part of his plea, the Court refused to strike it out, or direct their officer to enter a xoli prosequi. R. v. Brown, E. 31 Geo. 3.
of an election to the office of church- | 2. wardens, because it is no usurpation on the Crown. R. v. Shepherd, Mich. 32 Geo. 3. 381 7. The defendant relied on an election to the office of portreeve by an homage consisting of twenty-three free tenants; the jury found on a special verdict that twenty-one of these persons were not free tenants; and this Court held the election to be void. R. v. Mein, Mich. 32 Geo. 3. 480 8 The Court will not grant a quo war- ranto information to impeach a deri- vative title, if the person claiming the original title has been in the undis- turbed possession of his office six years. R. v. G. Peacock, E. 32 G. 3.
See Costs, No. 8; Pleading, No. 16, 17.
And if at a subsequent sessions it be dismissed for not having been made in time, and it be removed by certiorari into B. R. the Court will not go into any objection appearing upon the face of it. 12
A barge-way and toll-gate in the ham- let of Hampton-Wick, purchased by the city of London by virtue of the 17 Geo. 3. c. 18. (for completing the navigation of the Thames, and em powering the city to levy tolls and du- ties towards the charges of the navi- gation) are rateable towards the re- lief of the poor for such tolls as be- come due there, notwithstanding the tolls are collected in another parish. R. v. The Mayor, &c. of London, Mich. 31 Geo. 3. 21
Where a parish consisted of two se- parate districts, each of which imme- morially made a separate rate, but the money when raised was blended together in one joint fund, though ap- plied in certain proportions; and the Sessions did not find it as a fact that the parish could not reap the benefit of the 43 Eliz; it was held that the districes were not entitled to maintain their own poor separately, though since 1648 they constantly had in the whole more than four overseers, some of whom were chosen separately by the hamlet, and though the hamlet had im- memorially had a constable of its own, and since 1709 certificates had been granted to and from the hamlet to third parishes, and orders of removal made to and from it. R. v. T. Newell, E. 31 Geo. 3. 45. If a poor-rate be not published in the
1. Houses built on land embanked from the Thames in pursuance of the 7 Geo. 3. c. 37. which vests those lands in the owners free from taxes, are not li- able to be assessed to the general land- tax imposed by 27 Geo. S. though the latter is conceived in general terms, and is subsequent in point of time to the act creating the exemption. Williams v. Pritchard, Mich. 31 Geo. 3.
2. Nor are they liable to be assessed to the rates made under the 11 Geo. 3. c. 29. Eddington v. Borman, Mich. 31 Geo.
3. 3. The owner of stables in Marybone, which were rented by the colonel of a troop of horse, for the use of the troop (by the authority of the king) is lia- ble to be assessed for them to the rates made under stat. 10 Geo. 3. c. 23. for
paving, &c. Marybone parish. Ecker- sall v. Briggs, Mich. 31 Geo. S. See Appeal.
1. Appeal against it must be to the Ses- sions next after the allowance of it. R. v. J. Atkins, Mich. 31 Geo. 3. 12
church on the Sunday next after it is allowed, it is a nullity, and payment under it cannot be enforced, though there be an appeal to the Sessions which was dismissed. R. v. New- combe, Trin. S1 Geo. 3.
« AnteriorContinuar » |