American Maritime Cases, Volumen3American Maritime Cases, Incorporated, 1993 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 56
Página 1622
... bills of lading do not specifically provide that the syndicates ' cargo would be carried on deck . Accordingly , it is subject to COGSA . In an attempt to escape the effect of COGSA's provisions , however , plaintiffs assert that COGSA ...
... bills of lading do not specifically provide that the syndicates ' cargo would be carried on deck . Accordingly , it is subject to COGSA . In an attempt to escape the effect of COGSA's provisions , however , plaintiffs assert that COGSA ...
Página 1624
... bill of lading on NLB's behalf and with NLB's authority . When a bill of lading is signed by the charterer or its agent " for the master , " the shipowner is liable only if the signor had authority to bind the shipowner . See Pacific ...
... bill of lading on NLB's behalf and with NLB's authority . When a bill of lading is signed by the charterer or its agent " for the master , " the shipowner is liable only if the signor had authority to bind the shipowner . See Pacific ...
Página 1853
... Bill of Lading is sufficient notice under the precedents in this Circuit , while the plaintiff contends otherwise . Para- graph 26 of the Bill of Lading , marked “ Limitation of Liability , " closely tracks the language of COGSA . It ...
... Bill of Lading is sufficient notice under the precedents in this Circuit , while the plaintiff contends otherwise . Para- graph 26 of the Bill of Lading , marked “ Limitation of Liability , " closely tracks the language of COGSA . It ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
accident action admiralty agreed agreement alleged allowed amount Appeals apply arbitration argues argument assert authority award barge benefits bill of lading bridge cargo carrier cause charterer Circuit claim claimants clause COGSA Company compensation complaint concluded condition considered container contract Corp costs damage decision defendant denied determined dismiss district court duty economic loss effect employer entitled establish evidence existence F.Supp fact failed federal filed further Government granted held holding injury interest involved issue Jones Act jurisdiction liability lien limitation Lines Marine maritime maritime law matter Miles motion moved negligence noted operations owner party period person plaintiff present proceeding provides pursuant question reasonable received recover recovery relational reports result rule seaman settlement ship statute suit summary judgment tion tort transportation trial United vessel wages waters