American Maritime Cases, Volumen3American Maritime Cases, Incorporated, 1993 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 84
Página 2195
... duty owed when the vessel owner actively participates in the repair operation ; and ( 3 ) the duty owed by a vessel owner once the repair operation begins . There is no dispute that the instant case does not involve a condition that ...
... duty owed when the vessel owner actively participates in the repair operation ; and ( 3 ) the duty owed by a vessel owner once the repair operation begins . There is no dispute that the instant case does not involve a condition that ...
Página 2389
... duty to supervise the work , espe- cially where it took place on another ship . The court also held that Pintail did not breach its duty under Scindia to intervene because " [ t ] he scope of this duty is limited to the confines of a ...
... duty to supervise the work , espe- cially where it took place on another ship . The court also held that Pintail did not breach its duty under Scindia to intervene because " [ t ] he scope of this duty is limited to the confines of a ...
Página 2390
... duty of a shipowner to protection against hazards on another ship . The very notion under the dual capacity doctrine ... duty to protect against hazards under control of the ship ( which we consider a narrow exception and discuss below ) ...
... duty of a shipowner to protection against hazards on another ship . The very notion under the dual capacity doctrine ... duty to protect against hazards under control of the ship ( which we consider a narrow exception and discuss below ) ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
accident action admiralty agreed agreement alleged allowed amount Appeals apply arbitration argues argument assert authority award barge benefits bill of lading bridge cargo carrier cause charterer Circuit claim claimants clause COGSA Company compensation complaint concluded condition considered container contract Corp costs damage decision defendant denied determined dismiss district court duty economic loss effect employer entitled establish evidence existence F.Supp fact failed federal filed further Government granted held holding injury interest involved issue Jones Act jurisdiction liability lien limitation Lines Marine maritime maritime law matter Miles motion moved negligence noted operations owner party period person plaintiff present proceeding provides pursuant question reasonable received recover recovery relational reports result rule seaman settlement ship statute suit summary judgment tion tort transportation trial United vessel wages waters