American Maritime Cases, Volumen3American Maritime Cases, Incorporated, 1993 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 75
Página 1962
... ship which was solely to blame , because they ( the underwriters ) had no independent right of action but only such right as they might have derived from the owner of the lost ship in whose place they stood . He had no right of action ...
... ship which was solely to blame , because they ( the underwriters ) had no independent right of action but only such right as they might have derived from the owner of the lost ship in whose place they stood . He had no right of action ...
Página 2109
... ship repairman because he did not personally build or repair ships . It is not necessary that a worker , however , actually build or repair ships to be included within these classifications . He must only be directly involved in the ...
... ship repairman because he did not personally build or repair ships . It is not necessary that a worker , however , actually build or repair ships to be included within these classifications . He must only be directly involved in the ...
Página 2112
... ship repairman , Easley is prohibited from bring- ing an action for negligence against the vessel or his employer as ship- owner under LHWCA §5 ( b ) . So , because he is a shipbuilder or ship repairman , Easley's recovery under the ...
... ship repairman , Easley is prohibited from bring- ing an action for negligence against the vessel or his employer as ship- owner under LHWCA §5 ( b ) . So , because he is a shipbuilder or ship repairman , Easley's recovery under the ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
accident action admiralty agreed agreement alleged allowed amount Appeals apply arbitration argues argument assert authority award barge benefits bill of lading bridge cargo carrier cause charterer Circuit claim claimants clause COGSA Company compensation complaint concluded condition considered container contract Corp costs damage decision defendant denied determined dismiss district court duty economic loss effect employer entitled establish evidence existence F.Supp fact failed federal filed further Government granted held holding injury interest involved issue Jones Act jurisdiction liability lien limitation Lines Marine maritime maritime law matter Miles motion moved negligence noted operations owner party period person plaintiff present proceeding provides pursuant question reasonable received recover recovery relational reports result rule seaman settlement ship statute suit summary judgment tion tort transportation trial United vessel wages waters