American Maritime Cases, Volumen3American Maritime Cases, Incorporated, 1993 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 78
Página 1699
... statute of limitations did not bar claim made within admiralty jurisdiction ) . Plaintiffs argue that , because only Congress may enact periods of limitation for admiralty suits , the contractual limitation period contained in the ...
... statute of limitations did not bar claim made within admiralty jurisdiction ) . Plaintiffs argue that , because only Congress may enact periods of limitation for admiralty suits , the contractual limitation period contained in the ...
Página 2146
... statute was tolled until the administrative proceeding was dismissed , plaintiffs note that their claim under the SAA would not prescribe until November of 1992 , thereby allowing refiling . Plaintiffs argue that the statute of ...
... statute was tolled until the administrative proceeding was dismissed , plaintiffs note that their claim under the SAA would not prescribe until November of 1992 , thereby allowing refiling . Plaintiffs argue that the statute of ...
Página 2329
... statute is to be construed in accordance with " the expanded general venue statute , 28 U.S.C. §1391 ( c ) ( 1964 ed . ) . " In so concluding , Justice Harlan wrote : “ Although there is no elucidation from statutory history as to the ...
... statute is to be construed in accordance with " the expanded general venue statute , 28 U.S.C. §1391 ( c ) ( 1964 ed . ) . " In so concluding , Justice Harlan wrote : “ Although there is no elucidation from statutory history as to the ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
accident action admiralty agreed agreement alleged allowed amount Appeals apply arbitration argues argument assert authority award barge benefits bill of lading bridge cargo carrier cause charterer Circuit claim claimants clause COGSA Company compensation complaint concluded condition considered container contract Corp costs damage decision defendant denied determined dismiss district court duty economic loss effect employer entitled establish evidence existence F.Supp fact failed federal filed further Government granted held holding injury interest involved issue Jones Act jurisdiction liability lien limitation Lines Marine maritime maritime law matter Miles motion moved negligence noted operations owner party period person plaintiff present proceeding provides pursuant question reasonable received recover recovery relational reports result rule seaman settlement ship statute suit summary judgment tion tort transportation trial United vessel wages waters