Richey's Federal Employers' Liability, Safety Appliance, and Hours of Service ActsMichie Company, 1916 - 795 páginas |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 97
Página 20
... and unusual , the court held on the evidence , that " The fact that only one brakeman is usually necessary for the operation of a pas- a case where the employee , and the employer , § 13 20 FEDERAL EMPLOYERS ' LIABILITY ACT .
... and unusual , the court held on the evidence , that " The fact that only one brakeman is usually necessary for the operation of a pas- a case where the employee , and the employer , § 13 20 FEDERAL EMPLOYERS ' LIABILITY ACT .
Página 21
... brakeman for this particular train , is not a controlling fact . If the plain- tiff was ordered by the directing offi- cers of the corporation to the opera- tion of this train as a member of Em- ory's crew , and if he boarded the train ...
... brakeman for this particular train , is not a controlling fact . If the plain- tiff was ordered by the directing offi- cers of the corporation to the opera- tion of this train as a member of Em- ory's crew , and if he boarded the train ...
Página 23
... brakeman was held an employee although there was nothing in the contract indicating that as such he was to render any service whatever for defendant , but the testimony conclusively showed that he was expected to perform , and did ...
... brakeman was held an employee although there was nothing in the contract indicating that as such he was to render any service whatever for defendant , but the testimony conclusively showed that he was expected to perform , and did ...
Página 24
... brakeman from obeying such an order , the con- ductor had authority to order the plaintiff to act as fireman , and in obeying such order the plaintiff was acting within the scope of his employment . * But a fireman whose duty it was to ...
... brakeman from obeying such an order , the con- ductor had authority to order the plaintiff to act as fireman , and in obeying such order the plaintiff was acting within the scope of his employment . * But a fireman whose duty it was to ...
Página 39
... brakemen was not in conflict with nor superseded by any act of congress , which case was af- firmed on writ of error to the Supreme Court of the United States in Chicago , etc. , R. Co. v . Arkansas , 219 U. S. 453 , 55 L. Ed . 290 , 31 ...
... brakemen was not in conflict with nor superseded by any act of congress , which case was af- firmed on writ of error to the Supreme Court of the United States in Chicago , etc. , R. Co. v . Arkansas , 219 U. S. 453 , 55 L. Ed . 290 , 31 ...
Contenido
323 | |
336 | |
343 | |
352 | |
360 | |
370 | |
384 | |
394 | |
117 | |
131 | |
138 | |
144 | |
150 | |
156 | |
167 | |
173 | |
176 | |
177 | |
186 | |
190 | |
194 | |
195 | |
199 | |
201 | |
205 | |
208 | |
209 | |
211 | |
213 | |
217 | |
218 | |
219 | |
220 | |
222 | |
224 | |
225 | |
226 | |
228 | |
229 | |
230 | |
244 | |
261 | |
265 | |
298 | |
303 | |
307 | |
403 | |
411 | |
421 | |
437 | |
444 | |
452 | |
458 | |
464 | |
470 | |
476 | |
507 | |
511 | |
526 | |
534 | |
540 | |
546 | |
562 | |
578 | |
590 | |
597 | |
603 | |
609 | |
618 | |
624 | |
631 | |
636 | |
644 | |
651 | |
657 | |
663 | |
703 | |
721 | |
727 | |
733 | |
735 | |
768 | |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Richey's Federal Employers' Liability, Safety Appliance, and Hours of ... Homer Richey,Daunis McBride Sin vista previa disponible - 2015 |
Términos y frases comunes
act of congress affirmed in 36 alleged amendment apply assumed the risk assumption of risk Atchison automatic couplers beneficiaries brakeman brakes cause of action charge Chesapeake Chicago CLEARANCE common carrier common law contributory negligence coupling damages death deceased defective defendant defendant's drawbars duty employee engaged in interstate engine equipped evidence fact failure federal act federal courts federal statute freight HANDHOLDS hauled held house cars Illinois Cent inches injury instruction interstate commerce Interstate Commerce Commission intrastate judgment jurisdiction jury Kansas Liability Act locomotive Louis Louisville merce Minn Minneapolis Missouri Norfolk Northern Pac operation pecuniary petition plaintiff pleadings ployee question rail railroad railroad company reason recover recovery repair reversed rule safety appliance act Southern specified for Box statute sufficient Supreme Court switch tion track train trial uncoupling United verdict violation writ of error yard York
Pasajes populares
Página 721 - ... for a continuous carriage or shipment, from one State or Territory of the United States, or the District of Columbia, to any other State or Territory of the United States, or the District of Columbia, or from any place in the United States to an adjacent foreign country, or from any place in the United States through a foreign country to any other place in the United States. The term "railroad...
Página 654 - ... the fact that the employee may have been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar a recovery, but the damages shall be diminished by the jury in proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to such employee: Proridfd.
Página 654 - Columbia or any of the states or territories and any foreign nation or nations, shall be liable in damages to any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative, for the benefit of the surviving widow or husband and children of such employee; and, if none, then of such employee's parents; and, if none, then of the next of kin dependent upon such employee...
Página 494 - January, eighteen hundred and ninety-eight, it shall be unlawful for any such common carrier to haul or permit to be hauled or used on its line any car used in moving interstate traffic not equipped with couplers coupling automatically by impact, and which can be uncoupled without the necessity of men going between the ends of the cars.
Página 184 - ... resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier, or by reason of any defect or insufficiency, due to its negligence, in its cars, engines, appliances, machinery, track, roadbed, works, boats, wharves, or other equipment.
Página 150 - ... in any case where the violation by such common carrier of any statute enacted for the safety of employees contributed to the injury or death of such employee.
Página 391 - Act to recover damages for personal injuries to an employee, or where such injuries have resulted in his death, the fact that the employee may have been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar a recovery, but the damages shall be diminished by the jury in proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to such employee...
Página 654 - States shall be liable in damages to any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in any of said jurisdictions, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative...
Página 237 - The jurisdiction of the courts of the United States under this act shall be concurrent with that of the courts of the several states, and no case arising under this act and brought in any state court of competent jurisdiction shall be removed to any court of the United States.
Página 732 - An act to promote the safety of employees and travelers upon railroads by compelling common carriers engaged in Interstate commerce to equip their cars with automatic couplers and continuous brakes and their locomotives with driving-wheel brakes, and for other purposes," approved March 2d, 1893, and amended April 1st, 1896.