LONDON, SATURDAY, APRIL 24, 1915. CONTENTS.-No. 278. NOTES:-Was Webster a Contributor to 'Overbury's Armour of William the Co queror, 322. de Baena-Portraits of Thoreau - Pack-horses, 329 66 wrong. Scarcely had my assertion that Webster's A Monumental Column' of 1613 owed not a single line " to the 1615 'Characters' appeared in print, when I discovered the two passages common to these works to which BARON BOURGEOIS has drawn attention. I then realized that the occurrence of these passages, coupled with the parallel between The White Devil' and the Character of A Sexton' already noted, must be accounted for in one or other of the following ways: (1) that Webster had seen the New Characters' before they found their way into print; (2) that the author of the New Characters,' and the author of The White Devil,'' The Duchess of Malfy,' and A Monumental Column,' were one and the same person; or (3) that the passages in question were borrowed independently by Webster and the Character-writer from the The third of these hypotheses 6 same source. REPLIES:- General Bibliography relating to Gretna Green, 322-Col. the Hon. Cosmo Gordon-Queues in the Army Abolished, 324-Daniel Eccleston-Marybone Lane and Swallow Street-Elizabeth Cobbold-"Statesman Sir Charles Ashburnham, 325-Dreains and Literature I dismiss, because the independent borrowing The Military Medal and Sir John French-John Trusler by two writers of so many identical passages Beards- Biographical Information Wanted, 326Professors at Debitzen-" An inchalffe hesper"-Pictures is in the highest degree improbable. Which and Puritans-English Cousuls in Aleppo, 327-D'Oyley's of the two others is correct? BARON Warehouse-Reversed Engravings-Black Wool as a Cure for Deafness-Joshua Webster, M.D., 328-Alfonso BOURGEOIS unhesitatingly adopts the second as a complete solution of the problem; he would attribute to Webster the whole of the additional Characters of 1615. This conclusion cannot, I think, be supported. It seems to me that the only suppositions that will square with the facts are these: either that the parallels in question are due entirely to borrowing on Webster's part from the Overbury' material in a manuscript form, or that some of them are due to borrowing and others to identity of authorship. Tρía κάTTа Káκιora - Retrospective Heraldry-Courtesy Notes. 6 The difficulty with regard to these 1615 Characters is that, with the exception WAS WEBSTER A CONTRIBUTOR TO of three of them, there is no external 'OVERBURY'S CHARACTERS'? evidence of their authorship. These three (A Tinker,' An Apparatour,' and 'An THE appearance of BARON BOURGEOIS'S Almanac-Maker') were, as BARON BOURarticle dealing with the connexion between GEOIS states, claimed, and no doubt written, Webster's plays and the essays included by J. Cocke. Of what else of the material in the 1615 edition of 'Overbury's Cha-contained in 'New and Choise Characters of racters (11 S. x. 3, 23), so soon after, and severall Authors,' &c., can it be positively entirely independent of, my own contribution on the same subject (11 S. viii. 221, 244, 263, 282, 304), was naturally of great interest to me. It may be remembered that my examination of the parallels between these 'New and Choise Characters of severall Authors' and 'The Duchess of Malfy' led me to the conclusion that in writing his play, or revising it for the press, Webster borrowed from the Characters, and further, that he must have borrowed from the printed text of the sixth impression of 1615. In this latter conclusion I was almost certainly affirmed that Webster was not the author? First, Sir Thomas Overbury's poem 'The Wife,' and, secondly, nine of the essays entitled 'Newes from any Whence,' to which the names or initials of the writers are appended. Both these had previously appeared in 1614. The first edition of "The Wife contains Overbury's poem alone; to the second edition, published almost immediately afterwards (the Preface is dated May, 1614), were added twenty-one Characters, and the Newes,'" written by himselfe, and other learned gentlemen his friends.” 6 Where is our solicitor Room for the bag and baggage! I have noted also two phrases, one in Parallels, therefore, between Webster's and solicitors too carried bags. Contilupo, plays and The Wife,' the signed pieces of counsel for the plaintiff, is accordingly Newes,' or any of Cocke's three Characters, made to inquire, if such exist, cannot be accounted for by identity of authorship. And such parallels do exist. 'The Duchess of Malfy' borrows and Ariosto to exclaim,— from 'The Wife,' and The Devil's Law Case' not only from four of the nine signed pieces of Newes,' but also from one of Cocke's three Characters. I have already drawn attention to two parallels between The Wife' and 'The Duchess of Malfy': one of these is from the text of the play, and the other (repeated also in The Devil's Law Case') from the author's Preface to the first quarto of 1623. I have also shown that there are several striking parallels between "The Devil's Law Case' and the Newes.' Amongst the pieces of Newes' laid under contribution in this play are four of those identified by the names or initials of their authors, viz. : - 'Newes from Court,' Sir T. Overbury. 'Newes from the veric Countric,' I. D. (John Donne ?). Newes from my Lodging,' B. R. (Benjamin Rudyerd?). Newes of my Morning Worke,' Mist. B. And an apophthegm from a fifth, viz., 'Countrey Newes,' Sir T. R. (Thomas Roe?), reappears in A Cure for a Cuckold.' All but one of these parallels furnished by the signed pieces of Newes' will be found recorded in my former article (see 11 S. viii. 264, 284). The Newes from Court' parallel, which I had overlooked, is as follows:- ....wit and a woman are two fraile things, and both the frailer by concurring. Newes from Court.' Romelio [to Winifred]. and a woman Are two very frail things. 'D.L.C.,' I. ii. So much for the Newes.' I come now to the Character of A Tinker,' one of the three 1615 Characters claimed by Cocke, in which there occurs the following passage : The Duchess of Malfy and the other in The Devil's Law Case,' which seem to earliest edition of the Characters.' The argue Webster's acquaintance with the resemblanc s here, though eomparatively BOURGEOIS does not claim any of the preslight, are not altogether trivial. BARON 1615 Characters as Webster's, and as these were first published with the 'Newes' in the second edition of 1614, they must gory. obviously be treated as in the same cateIn order that these phrases may be distinguished from the more conspicuous parallels with the additional Characters of 1615, I repeat them here : ...a man's Walking'A Very Woman.' She [A Very Woman'] is.. consumption. Cardinal (indicating Julia). Yond's my lingring consumption. 'D.M.,' V. ii. Knaves rent him like Tenter-hookes. 'A Golden Asse.' They'll rent thee like tenter-hooks. What cannot a neat knave with a smooth tale A Good Woman.' Make a woman believe? D.M.,' I. ii. Some then, at least, of the passages to Webster's plays, and the writings published under Sir Thomas ...thou knowest, wit Overbury's name, indicate borrowing on Webster's part from the work of other writers. If this is the explanation of some of the parallel passages, it seems natural to assume that it is the explanation of all. But Webster's White Devil,' printed in 1612, and his A Monumental Column,' printed in 1613, present one or two striking parallels with the New and Choise Characters,' first published in 1615. Plagiarism by Webster can, only be assumed on the supposition that therefore, he was familiar with these Characters several years before they found their way into print. This is by no means unlikely. Several of Donne's poems, for instance, were referred to by his contemporaries nearly twenty years before they were issued from the press, and the circulation. of works in manuscript was evidently at So "The companion of his travels is some foule sunne-burnt Queane, that since the terrible statute recanted gypsisme, and is turned pedleresse. marches he all over England with his bag and baggage." That Webster was a man who joked with difficulty is only too plainly apparent to any one familiar with his plays. He preferred, when possible, to borrow his jokes. Here was a chance too good to be missed. Though he had no tinker in The Devil's Law Case,' he had a solicitor, Mr. Chambers, It is precisely these forty-two new Cha-- this time not unusual. was 66 Enfield. (To be continued.) printed several times at London BIBLIOGRAPHY OF HISTORIES OF while the author lived," i.e., previous to 15 Sept., 1613. The wording of the title-page of the 1615 edition also clearly indicates that neither Webster nor any one person was the author of the whole of the additional Characters then printed. The five previous editions (or "impressions") all purport to be primarily editions of Sir Thomas Overbury's poem, to which precedence is given on the titlepage of each. The first edition is without Characters; the second contains twentyone, the third twenty-two, and the fourth and fifth thirty-one. IRISH COUNTIES AND TOWNS. Varieties of Irish History, from Ancient and DELVIN. The Midland Septs and the Pale. By Rev. F. R. See Londonderry. DERRY. DERRYKEIGHAN. These Characters were admittedly not all Overbury's; they were "written by himselfe and other learned Gentlemen his friends." But with the sixth edition all Ballymoney and Derrykeighan. By Rev. J. Macpretence that Overbury was mainly re Erlean. DINGLE. sponsible is abandoned, and 'The Wife' is History of Dingle. By Thompson. London, 1847. relegated to a secondary position on the title-page. The title of this edition is: New and choise Characters of severall Authors; together with that exquisite and unmatcht Poeme, The Wife, written by Syr Thomas Overburie. With the former Characters and Conceited Newes, all in one Volume." * Possibly the words used in the publisher's Preface to the fifth (1614) edition, " Others [i.e. Characters' now added....first transcrib'd by Gentlemen of the same qualitie," may be taken as indicating that these Characters had been thus circulated in manuscript. Although many passages contained in the Newes' reappear in The Devil's Law Case,' I can find none in The Duchess of Malfy,' perhaps because Webster borrowed from a MS. which did not include the Newes.' Cited on the authority of Dr. E. F. Rimbault (Introduction to Overbury's' Works,' 1890, pp. xiixiii). DONAGHCLONEY. An Ulster Parish, being a History of Donaghcloney (Waringstown). By E. D. Atkinson. Crown 8vo, cloth. Dublin, 1898. DONAGHMORE. An Ancient Irish Parish, Past and Present: DONEGAL. Sketches in Ireland descriptive of Interesting Scenery and Antiquities of North-West Donegal. Inis-owen and Tirconnell, an Account of the The Ancient and Present State of the County of Papers read before the Church Architecture North Dublin, City and Environs. By Dillon DUFFERIN. Ecclesiastical Antiquities of Down, Connor, and cloth. Dublin, 1874-84. History of Down. By Alex. Knox, M.D. 1875. Antrim and Down. By Craik. London, 1887. DROGHEDA. History of Drogheda. By Barnard. Dublin, 1736. History of the General Rebellion in Ireland, 1641, to which is added Tichbourne's History of the Siege of Drogheda (1641) and Tryal of Conor, Lord MacGuire. 8vo, calf. Cork, 1766. History of Drogheda. By Johnston. Drogheda, 1826. History of Drogheda, with its Environs, and an The Boyne Valley. By James B. Cullen. Catholic The Council Book of the Corporation of Drogheda, DUNBRODY. History of Dunbrody Abbey. The History of Dundalk and its Environs, from 'THE GLOUCESTER JOURNAL': THE data in 'N. & Q.' relating to pro- For many years the volumes corresponded very closely with the "newspaper year," that is, from April, though there were variations in the number of issues in each volume, ranging from 45 to 54. The first three volumes contained 160 issues, paged from 1 to 960, there being six pages in each week's paper. No. 157 was numbered vol. iv., but Nos. 158 to 160, vol. iii. Vol. iv. commenced with 3 May, 1725, and ended 8 March, 1725 (i.e., 1725/6), 45 numbers. The first error in the weekly numeration occurs in this volume, the number 200 being printed instead of 197, and this was carried on for a few weeks, being rectified by repeating 217, 218, and 219. The first change in the period covered by the volume was made with vol. xlix., which contained only the issues from 16 April to 31 Dec., 1770 The paper for 7 Jan., 1771, was the first of vol. I., though actually this numbering would not be correct until the following April, and then for 101 years the The earlier errors had evidently been noticed, but though 28 Feb., 1891, was numbered vol. clxix., this was continued throughout the following year. The volumenumber for 1892 should have been clxxi. The numbering from vol. clxix. continues until 1906, when the issues for 6–20 Jan. are vol. clxxxiii., but from 27 Jan. to the end of that year vol. clxxxii., making an error of 3 counting from the commencement of the paper. This continued until 1914, and was increased to four by the omission, in 1915, to alter vol. exc. to exci. This, however, has now been corrected, and though the issue for 20 March, 1915, was altered to vol. cxciii., the following week bears the number cxciv., being right if allowance is made for the calendar year being chosen instead of the "newspaper year" (April to April). These notes will show how little reliancecan be placed on the volume-numbering of papers as a guide to their age. The Gloucester Journal for 27 March, 1915, is numbered 10,043, but I cannot say now how far this is correct. At present I have collated Nos. 1 to 2,076, and find that the last should have been 2,082. ROLAND AUSTIN. Gloucester. THE BANNER OF SIR PHILIP FRANCIS.. (See ante, pp. 240, 245.) The announcement of the death in February of Mr. Philip Francis, grandson of Sir Philip Francis, the reputed Junius," recalls the fact that he, as the direct representative of Sir Philip, claimed the latter's banner on the removal of |