Computer Games IILong before the advent of the electronic computer, man was fascinated by the idea of automating the thought processes employed in playing games of skill. The very first chess "Automaton" captured the imagination oflate eighteenth century Vienna, and by the early 1900s there was a genuine machine that could play the chess endgame of king and rook against a lone king. Soon after the invention of the computer, scientists began to make a serious study of the problems involved in programming a machine to play chess. Within a decade this interest started to spread, first to draughts (checkers) and later to many other strategy games. By the time the home computer was born, there had already been three decades of research into computer games. Many of the results of this research were published, though usually in publications that are extremely difficult (or even impossible for most people) to find. Hence the present volumes. Interest in computers and programming has now reached into almost every home in the civilized world. Millions of people have regular access to computers, and most of them enjoy playing games. In fact, approximately 80 percent of all software sold for use on personal computers is games software. |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 86
Página 87
( See Bibliography - D . N . L . L . ] The basic rules are simple , although there are
some rare situations where there is some difficulty in deciding who has won .
Owing to the possibility of such situations , there are some minor variations in the
...
( See Bibliography - D . N . L . L . ] The basic rules are simple , although there are
some rare situations where there is some difficulty in deciding who has won .
Owing to the possibility of such situations , there are some minor variations in the
...
Página 161
The incompleteness and ambiguity in the rules of Go , as practiced , are more
subtle and complex than we have so far indicated . A detailed discussion of the
difficulties is given by Olmstead and Robinson ( 1964 ) . For a game - theoretic
and ...
The incompleteness and ambiguity in the rules of Go , as practiced , are more
subtle and complex than we have so far indicated . A detailed discussion of the
difficulties is given by Olmstead and Robinson ( 1964 ) . For a game - theoretic
and ...
Página 167
To eliminate this disparity , we are led to modify Rule 6 ( a ) for ending the game
to read : Rule 6 ( b ) ( End ) . The game ... As our final set of rules for the use of
the computer , we now adopt Rules 1 - 4 , 5 ( a ) , 6 ( b ) , 7 , and 8 ( b ) . It
appears ...
To eliminate this disparity , we are led to modify Rule 6 ( a ) for ending the game
to read : Rule 6 ( b ) ( End ) . The game ... As our final set of rules for the use of
the computer , we now adopt Rules 1 - 4 , 5 ( a ) , 6 ( b ) , 7 , and 8 ( b ) . It
appears ...
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
Crítica de los usuarios - Marcar como inadecuado
jlnknkn jytkjty jytrjytrj jt yjtrj
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
added analysis arrangement attack basic Black block branch called chess complete components configuration connected considered created data structure decision defined described determined developed discs draw edge effect element evaluation example expert fact factors Figure final forcing four function further given gives goal Hand heuristic holds human important initial interesting knowledge lead learning linkage look machine means method move node Note object opening opponent pair particular pass pattern pieces planning play player points position possible present probability problem reasonable recognize represent routine rules score selection sequence shows side simple situation specific square stones strategy string structure subgoals success suit tactical territory tree Trick turn weighting White winning