The Governance of Close Corporations and Partnerships: US and European PerspectivesThis volume focuses upon the processes by which new business organization forms have developed in the US, UK, and continental Europe. Part I addresses the theoretical developments in partnership and close corporation law. In Part II, the contributors offer insights into the forces shaping theevolution of partnership-type business forms in the US, UK, and several European jurisdictions, and Part III provides detailed analyses of the Limited Liability Company (LLC), Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), the European Private Company, and the Dutch partnership form.The debate on the design of business organization forms adapted to meet the current needs of a range of closely held firms has gained momentum amid the continuing pressures to supply the most competitive business form for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Which economic and political forcesare responsible for the emergence of new limited liability forms for SMEs? Over the last decade this question has often been addressed, as corporate law scholars, practitioners, and policymakers have increasingly directed their attention towards introducing partnership-type business forms. In theUS, states have incentives to take a proactive attitude towards legislative innovations in the field of business organization law, so as to capture and retain closely held firms. In recent years, a rapid succession of statutory innovations of partnership forms (such as the introduction of the LLCand rapid adoption of the LLP) have transformed business organization law.Similar processes can also be identified in the UK and continental Europe. While the EC has pursued the harmonization of the law of public corporations, there has been no real attempt to adopt a series of similar measures for the benefit of closely held firms. A group of European business leadersand experts, however, have drafted recently a business organization statute appropriate for SMEs engaged in cross-border business. |
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Contenido
The Essential Role of Organizational Law | 23 |
UPA S 382cII 284 285 | 27 |
Michalski 142 A 2d 645 N J Super Ct App Div 1958 | 42 |
UPA S 40h | 43 |
Republic Natl Bank v Fitzgerald In re E A Fretz Co 565 F 2d 366 | 48 |
Announcement 834 10 Jan 1983 249 | 57 |
Corporations Law | 73 |
In re Merchant Traders Ship Land and Insurance Association 1852 | 83 |
Fed Reg 1489 7 Jan 1977 | 244 |
Rev Proc 8315 1983 163 | 249 |
IRC S 1365a | 251 |
LEGISLATIVE REFORM INITIATIVES IN | 273 |
Partnership Act 1890 S 5 UK 85 | 277 |
UPA S 312 | 280 |
Partnership Act 1890 SS 325 UK | 287 |
Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corp No | 313 |
Insolvency Act 1986 S 107 UK | 84 |
U S C S 548 1994 | 86 |
MatchSpecific Assets and Minority | 93 |
Ala Code S 108A103 Supp 1999 354 | 101 |
Warren 784 S W 2d 247 Mo App 1989 174 | 102 |
Springside Nursing Home Inc 353 N E 2d 657 | 122 |
RMBCA S 16 01 | 128 |
Standards of Performance Level the Playing | 133 |
EVOLUTION OF PARTNERSHIPS AND CLOSELY | 151 |
CES 3632002 of 2132002 383 | 153 |
RULPA S 1011 352 | 171 |
Prop Reg 301 77012a24 248 | 175 |
ULLCA S 401 221 | 177 |
Del Code Ann tit 8 281a4 101 | 181 |
Agip Africa Ltd v Jackson 1991 Ch 547 343 | 186 |
The Evolution of Closely Held Business Forms in Europe | 191 |
Case C21297 Centros Ltd v Erhvervs og Selskabsstyrelsen 1999 E C | 194 |
Miah 1998 1 W L R 477 2000 1 W L R 2123 338 | 214 |
Federalism Regulatory Competition and the Limited Liability | 241 |
Limited Liability Partnerships and Partnership Law Reform in | 317 |
Bass Brewers Ltd v Appleby 1997 2 B C L C 700 344 | 320 |
Elphick 1910 1 K B 846 Eng C A 1910 84 280 | 322 |
Caparo plc v Dickman 1990 2 A C 605 | 327 |
Official Receiver v Vass 1999 B C C 516 | 329 |
Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley 2002 2 All E R 377 | 337 |
Dubai Aluminium Company Ltd v Salaam 2001 QB 113 C A | 343 |
The Failed US Experiment | 347 |
Revised Model Business Corporation Act RMBCA 1977 See RMBCA | 351 |
Delaware General Corporation Law 12217 162 | 352 |
RUPA S 306 168 220 263 264 367 | 367 |
THE EUROPEAN PRIVATE COMPANY | 373 |
Salomon 1897 A C 22 | 376 |
The Reform Agenda for Partnerships and Closely Held Companies | 399 |
Taxation of PartnershipsHybrid Entities | 415 |
OECD Art 23B in combination with Art 10 OECD Model Treaty | 422 |
457 | |
Términos y frases comunes
adopted agreement analysis apply approach argue asset partitioning association benefits business forms capital changes chapter choice claim close corporation closely held Commission Company Law competition concerning considered continue contract corporate law costs courts create creditors decision default discussed dissolution duties Economics effect efficient entity European example existing fact fiduciary duties firm's firms give governance important incorporation increase individual interest internal investments issue Journal jurisdictions Law Review legislation limited liability limited partnership majority minority minority shareholders needs offer organization organizational owners participants particular parties partners partnership law permitting possible principle problem protection question rata reason reform regulation relations relationship respect result Ribstein risk rules RUPA Second separate shareholders shares standard statutes structure theory tion tort transaction Uniform United University