Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

MORE BOOKS OF IMPORTANCE

offered Second-hand at Reduced Prices by
THE TIMES BOOK

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

CLUB.

[blocks in formation]

By Vis

[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

LIFE OF LORD KITCHENER. By Sir GEORGE

ARTHUR. 3 Vols.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

Write for Complete Catalogue to

[blocks in formation]

THE TIMES BOOK CLUB, 380, Oxford Street, London, W.1.

LONDON, MAY 14, 1921.

CONTENTS.-No. 161.

NOTES:-Court-Martial on a

placed on half-pay in May, 1828, and died, unmarried, Dec. 15, 1869, at Blackrock, Dublin.

The following account of his trial by Duellist, Newfoundland, court-martial for shooting John Philpot in a duel is taken, somewhat abbreviated, from The Public Ledger and Newfoundland General Advertiser of Friday, April 28, 1826 :

381-Legay of Southampton and London, 385-"Gog 387-Captain Robert Wyard- Martin Chuzzlewit Elijah Pogram, 389-Crucifixion of Dogs-Deaths, 390. QUERIES:-King of England, Lord of Baux-Lives of Venetian Painters-Menzel's German Literature,' 390Napoleon as a Child-Arms of Ellingham- Letters from Galilee '-John Winthrop Inner Temple, 1628-Francis and John Gallini-Wiche-James William Unwin --Foxhounds- Stirbitch Fair'-Rayner of Woodham Walter-" Cicero" Cook the Learned "Scout "-Rice,391Van Der Does-The Exercitia Spiritualia' of St. Ignatius Loyola-Corsican War-Dogs: Island of Fowls-Early Stage-Coaches-The Monument: Ingoldsby Legends Statues of George IV. at Brighton-"Common Garden"-Norfolk Cheeses in the Fourteenth Century, 392-G. A. Cooke and his County Itineraries-Authors Wanted, 393.

and Magog," 386-Aldeburgh Chamberlains' Accounts,

v.

or

REPLIES:-" Cor ad cor loquitur "-Mary Russel Mitford's Lottery Prize, 393-" Amtmann "-Thackeray: 'The Newcomes-Book Borrowers-" Geen" Whisky, 394A Seventeenth-Century Surveyors' Compass-" Britisher" "Briton "-" The Haven under the Hill "-Smallest Pig of a Litter-Political Verses by Charles Lamb ?Capt. Cook's Crew: Coco-nut Cup, 395-Cream-coloured Horses-Pastorini's Prophecies-Carew Family of Beddington, Surrey, Bart.-Double Firsts at Oxford, 396 Publications of Frederick Locker-Lampson-The Tomahawk '-William Congreve-Ghost Stories connected with Old London Bridge, 397-The Mermaid at her Toilet'-Hunger Strike in the Fourteenth CenturyJohn Pym-Wine Names-Paul Lucas : His Journey through Asia Minor'-Collet Family, 398. NOTES ON BOOKS: Molière 'The Gild of St. Mary, Lichfield''The West Riding of of Archaeology and Anthropology-Cornhill. Notices to Correspondents.

Notes.

Yorkshire'-Annals

TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL OF A DUELLIST. NEWFOUNDLAND, 1826. CAPTAIN MARK RUDKIN, the duellist here in question, belonged to a family which has been traced as owning property in Norfolk and Rutland from the thirteenth century onwards, and a branch of which had been settled in Ireland, in Co. Carlow, since the middle of the seventeenth century. He was the second son of William Rudkin of Corris, Co. Carlow, born June 4, 1786. A Captain in the 50th and 100th Regiments, and afterwards in the Royal Newfoundland Veteran Company, he served in the Peninsular War from 1808 to 1813, being engaged in the disastrous Walcheren Expedition in 1809. He was present at nearly all the great battles in the Peninsular War, being several times wounded, and received a medal with five clasps. He was finally

SUPREME COURT.

April 17, 1826.

THE KING v8. MARK RUDKIN, GEORGE FARQUHAR MORICE, and JAMES STRACHAN, for the wilful murder of JOHN PHILPOT, by shooting him with a pistol-ball, in a duel on the 30th March last.

(Mark Rudkin, Capt. Royal Veteran Companies, as principal; and James Strachan, Surgeon of the same, and G. F. Morice, Capt. R.N., as accomplices-principals in the second degree.)

The ATTORNEY-GENERAL opened the proceedings, and gave an outline of the case intended to be proved. In whatever point of view it was regarded, he said-whether as it respected the individual whose death was the cause of the present inquiry, who had been suddenly cut off, in the vigour of health from all the endearments of social life-whether considered in reference ing the personal safety of the prisoners, it was to the violated laws of the country-or as affectone of the most serious with which he had ever had to do; but he exhorted the jury to dismiss from their minds whatever they might have heard out of doors; or, if they could not entirely divest themselves of those recollections, it were better to set upon them the seal of falsehood and cast them from them. They were bound upon their oaths to be governed in their decision by the evidence which would now be brought before them. The principles of law upon which the prosecution was founded were then laid down; first, in order to enable the jury with more facility to embrace the principles of the case; and, secondly, he felt it due to the defendants to facilitate their defence in the perilous situation in which they were placed. The following citations were then made :

"The fact of killing being first proved, all the circumstances of accident, necessity, or infirmity are to be satisfactorily proved by the prisoners, unless they should arise out of the evidence profact to have been founded in malice until the duced against them; for the law presumeth the contrary shall have been made apparent . . ." et seqq. (Foster, p. 255).

The same learned writer (Mr. Justice Foster), whose high authority he (the Attorney-General) had just cited, speaking of duelling, says that:"If death ensueth from deliberate duelling, such death is, in the eye of the law, murder. And though a person should be drawn into a duel, not upon a motive so criminal, but merely on the punctilio of what swordsmen falsely call honour, that will not excuse; for he that deliberately taketh the blood of another, upon a private quarrel, acteth in defiance of all laws human and divine " et seqq. (ibid., F. 297).

As to the malice which the law implies in such cases, the same learned Judge says that:-

"Most if not all the cases which are ranged under the head of implied malice will, if carefully adverted to, be found to turn upon this single point, that the fact hath been attended with such circumstances as carry in them the plain indications of a heart regardless of social duty, and fatally bent upon mischief (ibid., p. 257)

On the subject of accomplices the same learned Judge says that :

"In order to render a person an accomplice and a principal in felony, he must be aiding and abetting at the fact, or ready to afford assistance if necessary" (ibid., p. 350).

A distinction was then drawn between the second of the deceased duellist and the second of the survivor. The Attorney-General observed that the law which he had cited was to be traced in the earliest authorities, and was recognized in our own days in Rice's case (3 East, 581); and among the cases therein referred to, the distinction between the seconds was again recognized. He then proceeded to call the evidence.

LIEUT.-COLONEL THOMAS ROWLAND BURKE, of the Veteran Companies, sworn and examined :Knows the prisoners at the bar. Captain Rudkin is under his orders; Dr. Strachan is AssistantSurgeon in the military establishment; Captain Morice commands the Governor's yacht in the harbour. John Philpot was lately Ensign in his corps he is recently dead. On the 30th March last, between three and four o'clock in the afternoon, Captain Rudkin rushed into witness's room, seemingly out of his mind, and told him that Mr. Philpot was dead. Witness asked for an explanation ; thinking from his manner that he was distracted. Captain Rudkin said that Mr. Philpot had kicked him last evening, that they had just fought, and that he had shot him dead. Mr. Philpot had been with witness several times that morning; he was then in good

health.

By the Court:-Witness inquired who the seconds were, when Captain Rudkin said, 66 Mr. Strachan "; and, after some hesitation, added "Captain Morice." Thinks Captain R. told him that Mr. Strachan was his (Capt. R.'s) second, but he is not very certain. Witness had seen Mr. Philpot several times that morning upon points of duty; there was nothing peculiar in his manner.

CAVENDISH WILLOCK :-Knows all the prisoners. Knew Ensign John Philpot. Knows of his death. Knows how and when he came by his death. He was killed in a duel by Captain Rudkin. On the last Thursday in March witness was in an enclosure at the back of West's farm, within a mile from the town, and saw there Captain Rudkin, Mr. Philpot, Dr. Strachan, and Capt Morice. The ground was measured out by Captain Morice and Dr. Strachan. The distance was 15 paces. At that time Captain R. was standing upwards of 100 yards from the others. Philpot was standing close to the seconds, and was the first who took his station, having previously taken off his coat. Captain Rudkin then took his station upon being beckoned to by the others,

[ocr errors]

without taking off his coat. The pistols were then given to them by the seconds, who tossed up, and the words Ready-fire were given by Dr. Strachan. They instantly fired, but without effect. Mr. Philpot immediately extended his pistol, as if to return it to Captain Morice, who took it. Rudkin kept his by his side until Strachan went up and took it from him. The seconds then talked together; but witness could not hear what they said. After conversing a short time, each went to his principal and talked to him with a view, as witness concluded, to an wards heard Captain Morice say that it was a accommodation of the dispute, because he afterpity Mr. Philpot would not apologize after the first shot. The seconds then returned to each other, and after a short time re-delivered the pistols to Captain Rudkin and Mr. Philpot. Strachan and Morice again tossed up, and the same word was given by Captain Morice as that which had before been given by Dr. Strachan. Instantly on the word they fired together; both shots appeared like one and Mr. Philpot fell. Witness immediately ran up to him and caught him by the hand; Captain Rudkin, at the same time, caught him by the other hand, and appeared very much agitated. He said he hoped he was not much hurt, and that he believed it was only in the arm. Dr. Strachan and witness both asked Mr. Philpot where he was hit; but he never spoke nor uttered even a groan except when he fell. Witness, Strachan, and Morice then turned him on his side, and having torn his shirt discovered that the ball had entered his right side, opposite the heart. Dr. Strachan immediately said the wound was mortal and that he was dying. Captain Rudkin then said he would go and tell the Colonel what had happened, and send persons to take care of the body. Witness, on perceiving that Mr. Philpot was quite dead, covered the body over with his coat and then left it.

By the Court :-The occurrence happened between 1 and 2 o'clock. Witness was, he believes, not more than fourteen yards from the parties. He went into the enclosure with Philpot and Morice. From the means which he had of knowing the parties, could have no doubt that Capt. Morice, Capt. Rudkin, and Dr. Strachan were the persons who were on the ground.

EDWARD KIELLEY:Is a surgeon. Knew Ensign John Philpot, was sent for by the Coroner, during the inquest, to inspect the body. Found a wound between the 5th and 6th ribs, on the right side, through the membrane and lining of the chest. It was a pistol-ball wound. It had penetrated the third lobe of the right lung. Found the pistol-ball in the body and extracted it. Has no doubt that that wound was the cause of the death of the deceased. (This witness was about to give an anatomical description of the appearance of the body upon opening it, but the Court thought this unnecessary, and therefore dispensed with it.)

Cross-examined:The ball entered between the 5th and 6th ribs; and from the situation in which it entered, the arm of the deceased must have been extended, as if in the act of firing when he received the wound.

This was the case for the prosecution.

MR. DAWE, for the defence, addressed the Court, and read the following appeals from the respective prisoners.

66

CAPTAIN RUDKIN'S ADDRESS.

My Lords, and Gentlemen of the Jury, "Labouring under feelings of the deepest regret, for the melancholy circumstance which has placed me and my fellow-prisoners in the unhappy situation in which we now stand before you, and charged as we are by the indictment, as principal and accessories in a crime at the bare mention of which human nature shudders, I have thought it prudent to commit to paper the few observations I have to address to you, lest, in the agitation I must naturally feel on so awful an occasion, I should omit anything which might be material to our defence.

"I will not, gentlemen, detain you by stating all the minute facts attending the lamentable

occurrence.

"The fatal quarrel, gentlemen, arose at a card-party at the quarters of a brother-officer, and the deceased addressed me in language which I will not repeat. he was in a state of great mental irritation, and I saw, however, that therefore left the room to prevent his further himself; committing followed me out of the door and kicked me. gentlemen, he Yes, gentlemen, I blush to acknowledge that I suffered the vile indignity; aye, and in the presence of a gentleman, and that gentleman I will call to prove the fact.

when,

"Of all the personal insults one man can give another, a kick is, gentlemen, the most galling A blow is certainly a very gross and degrading. "You have as yet only heard the mere naked provocation, but the man who strikes you, treats facts immediately attending the fatal rencounter in the scale of the creation; but, gentlemen, in you as if you were upon a level with himself in which I have unhappily, though unintentionally, deprived a fellow-being of existence; sinks you in your estimation, as it were, below a kick, contempt is coupled with violence; it but trust, gentlemen, that when the circum- humanity; it is an act which a man of correct stances which led to it have been given in evidence, and humane feeling would scarcely commit you will be satisfied that, as a British Officer, towards a dog he regarded; it leaves a stain upon I was bound to seek that satisfaction which, the character of the injured party, especially according to the laws of honour and the established rules and customs amongst military men, could alone atone for the gross insults and provocation I received-or, that I must otherwise for ever have forfeited all claim to that character which I had acquired by years spent in the arduous service of that country in whose cause I have so often fought and bled.

"Gentlemen, we stand indicted for wilful Murder. To constitute this crime, to use the language of a learned Judge, the fact must be attended by such circumstances as are the ordinary symptoms of a wicked, depraved, and malignant spirit; a heart regardless of social duty, and deliberately bent upon mischief.'

"It is not for me, nor for my fellow-prisoners, to speak of our own characters. What they are, gentlemen, you will hear from the witnesses; and I trust that when you have heard them

"By some means, gentlemen, it has acquired publicity that the insults offered me by the deceased, on the night previous to the fatal meeting, were not the first that I received from him it is, indeed, but too true.

:

"For his previous conduct he had apologized; and I most solemnly declare, standing, as I now do, at the bar of this tribunal, through whose decision I might, perhaps, in a few short hours appear before the more high and awful tribunal of my Creator, that I had, with all that candour and sincerity which are the characteristics of my countrymen, with all my heart and soul forgiven him, and that I entertained the same friendly disposition towards him which I had felt from our first acquaintance. And, gentlemen, it has been laid down, by the highest legal authorities, that if there be an old quarrel between A and B, and they are reconciled again, and then upon a new falling out A kills B, this is not murder, for it is not to be presumed that the parties fought upon the old grudge, unless it appears from the whole circumstances of the

in military life, which verbal apologies never can
efface; and, gentlemen, had I not redeeemed
my character by pursuing the course I did
(however much the event of it is to be deplored),
and held in contempt by my men.
I should have been scouted by my brother-officers
Vain would
it have been for me to quit my present regiment;
the disgrace would have stuck to me through
the army, would have driven me from it, and
have followed me even into the retirement of
private life. What would it have availed me
that I had served, with a reputation for courage
unsullied and undoubted, in all those campaigns
which have raised the British Army to the highest
pitch of military glory, had I submitted to this
degrading indignity without resenting it as an
officer and a gentleman. I should, notwith-
standing, for ever have been branded as a poltroon
and a coward.

"Gentlemen, I had no alternative. If I had reported his conduct to the commanding officer, his ruin would have been certain-but that would not have repaired my injured honour. An officer in the army, however high his rank, is bound to resent such an insult as I received in the manner I did; nor can he ever refuse a challenge from an inferior officer. It is not long since the Marquis of Londonderry, Colonel of the 10th Hussars, went out with Mr. Battier, a Cornet in his regiment.

"I requested Dr. Strachan, who was the friend of both parties, to wait upon him. He accepted my challenge. We went, gentlemen, to the fatal field, but with widely different feelings, and for widely different purposes-I, gentlemen, to repair my injured honour, and he, to seek my life. Had that, gentlemen, not been his fixed determination, he might, without even the shadow of an imputation on his courage, or indeed even without submitting to an apology, have averted his untimely fate. He might have fired in the air, and then the matter must have ended.

He

in full confidence that he would have followed that advice, I did, as it will be proved in evidence, fire the first shot in the most careless manner, purposely to avoid injuring him; but when I found that, instead of doing so, he did deliberately fire at me that he afterwards resisted all the earnest entreaties and endeavours of our seconds, who were alike the friends of both, to effect an accommodation-when I saw him change his position, and fix his eye upon me as if to make sure of his intended victim, I was compelled, in defence of my own life, to fire the second time. But, gentlemen, you will be satisfied from the evidence that I fired in the most fair and honourable manner. My pistol was not raised till the word was given, and we fired instantaneously. The distance was unusually great. The pistols I had never seen before; they were not adapted for duelling, but were of the commonest description-such as must convince even the most inexperienced in such matters that the fatal result was the effect of chance and not of superior skill or deliberate aim.

[ocr errors]

Gentlemen, as a further proof that the deceased went out with a fixed determination not to quit the ground till one of us had fallen-a short time previous to leaving his quarters he took off a flannel waistcoat and flannel shirt (which were articles of dress he always wore), that in case my fire took effect nothing might be carried in with the ball likely to irritate or increase the inflammation of the wound. On the ground he threw off his coat, keeping nothing on but trousers and a linen shirt.

"It is not, gentlemen, in the power of language to convey to you my feelings of regret for the fatal result; but even should your verdict consign me to the scaffold, my conscience would, in my last moments, acquit me of any vindictive feeling towards the ill-fated man who fell by my hand. But, gentlemen, the more I reflect on the melancholy event, the more I am convinced that I could not possibly have acted otherwise than I have done. My God! Gentlemen, could I have lived a disgrace to that honourable profession to which my life has been devoted-to my family and to my country?

"I must here, on behalf of the gentlemen who are implicated with me in this unhappy business, beg most solemnly to declare that their conduct throughout was honourable in the extreme: they were alike on friendly terms with us both, and they evinced the greatest anxiety, before going to the field, and when there, before we fired, and after the first shot, to bring the matter to an amicable conclusion. Most gladly, gentlemen, would I have complied with any terms they proposed, confident that the honour of both parties could not be placed in safer hands.

Gentlemen, I have been nearly 22 years a soldier, and have served my country in all the campaigns in the Peninsula, at Walcheren, and in America. I have been frequently wounded, and I have been a prisoner of war. During this long period, you must naturally suppose, I have met with brother-officers of all tempers and dispositions, and under circumstances calculated to prove them both; but, gentlemen, till this unfortunate business, I do most solemnly assure you that I never before was party to a similar affair.

This is, gentlemen, I am informed, the first case of this unhappy description which has oc

curred in this or the neighbouring colonies, with the exception of that of Mr. Uniacke, who, with his second, was tried at Halifax for the murder of Mr. Bowie, as is, most probably, within the recollection of you all.

"In that case the parties were not military men, neither was the provocation of such a nature but that it might have been decided by a legal tribunal, without any imputation upon the courage of either party. Mr. Uniacke, however, was a man possessing high spirit and honourable feeling, and preferred appealing to the laws of honour instead of those of his country. He called Mr. Bowie out; they fought, and at the second fire the latter fell. Mr. Uniacke and his second, Mr. McSwiney, were, as I before stated, indicted for wilful murder, but as it appeared from the whole of the evidence that the unfortunate transaction had been fairly and honourably conducted, the jury (after an impressive charge from the Judge, in which he recapitulated the evidence, laid down the law on the subject, and pointed out the general conduct of jurors on such occasions) returned a verdict of Not guilty.

"In the United Kingdom, where matters of this unhappy description are of more frequent occurrence, they are, I might almost say, sanctioned by custom, and whatever might be the strict letter of the law, in some degree even by the Judges themselves-as in the case of Mr. Alcock and his second, who were in the year 1808 indicted at the Wexford Assizes for the wilful murder of John Colclough, Esq., in a duel, which arose from a quarrel at a contested election. They were honourably acquitted by the jury; and Baron Smith, before whom the cause was tried, in discharging the prisoners, expressed his satisfaction at the verdict.

"I will only detain you, gentlemen, to mention one case more, of which you, no doubt, all have heard that of Col. Montgomery and Capt. Macnamara. A quarrel took place between those gentlemen in Hyde Park, in consequence of their dogs fighting. A duel ensued, and Col. Montgomery fell. Capt. Macnamara stood his trial at the Old Bailey, in 1803, for wilful murder, and was acquitted by the jury; and I cannot close my address to you in words more manly and eloquent than those in which that gentleman concluded his on that occasion. He, gentlemen, was a captain in the navy, as I am in the army; the same high sense of honour, the same tenacious regard for character, are alike common to the officers in both services; but I will give you his own words :—

"Gentlemen (said he), I am a captain of the British Navy-my character you can only hear from others; but to maintain any character in that station I must be respected. When called upon to lead others into honourable dangers, I must not be supposed to be a man who had sought safety by submitting to what custom has taught others to consider as a disgrace. I am not presuming to urge anything against the laws of God, or of this land. I know that, in the eye of religion and reason, obedience to the law, though against the general feelings of the world, is the first duty, and ought to be the rule of action; but, in putting a construction upon my motives so as to ascertain the quality of my actions, you will make allowances for my situation. It is impossible to define in terms the proper feelings of a gentleman; but

[ocr errors]
« AnteriorContinuar »