Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 81
Página 81
Clyde W. Woody , Houston , Tex . , Lloyd M. Lunsford , South Houston , Tex . , for appellants . Frank Briscoe , Dist . Atty . , Samuel H. Robertson , Jr. , Asst . Dist . Atty . , Hous- ton , Tex . , for appellees .
Clyde W. Woody , Houston , Tex . , Lloyd M. Lunsford , South Houston , Tex . , for appellants . Frank Briscoe , Dist . Atty . , Samuel H. Robertson , Jr. , Asst . Dist . Atty . , Hous- ton , Tex . , for appellees .
Página 86
These appellants were represented by Jack Knight , a very able criminal trial lawyer of Texas . The record in the case discloses that the District Attorney of Harris County , Texas , following his us- ual policy on the occasion of the ...
These appellants were represented by Jack Knight , a very able criminal trial lawyer of Texas . The record in the case discloses that the District Attorney of Harris County , Texas , following his us- ual policy on the occasion of the ...
Página 309
Appellant is serving a prison sentence under a judgment entered in the County Court of Queens County , New York ... Appellant's decision to alter his plea was made during the course of a conference in the cham- bers of the trial judge ...
Appellant is serving a prison sentence under a judgment entered in the County Court of Queens County , New York ... Appellant's decision to alter his plea was made during the course of a conference in the cham- bers of the trial judge ...
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
action affirmed agree agreement alleged amount appellant's appellee application Attorney authority Board cause charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 319 City claims Company completed condition considered constitute construction contention contract corporation counsel Court of Appeals decision defendant denied determination direct District Court effect employees engine entered evidence examiner fact federal filed funds further Government guilty held indicated interest invention involved issue judgment June jurisdiction jury L.Ed Labor Relations limited matter means ment motion negligence NUMBER Office operation opinion parties patent person plaintiff position present prior proceeding question reason received record reference rejection Relations result rule S.Ct sentence specific statement statute strike SYSTEM tion trial union United violation Washington witness York