The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1952 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 79
Página 263
... determine propriety of deficiencies assessed by com- missioner for excess profit tax liability on ground of excessive and unreasonable sala- ries , tax court is not bound to accept opin- ion testimony as to reasonableness even though it ...
... determine propriety of deficiencies assessed by com- missioner for excess profit tax liability on ground of excessive and unreasonable sala- ries , tax court is not bound to accept opin- ion testimony as to reasonableness even though it ...
Página 420
... determine the incidental question there pre- sented , namely , his asserted sole heirship . He says that when the court undertook to determine that incidental issue , it necessar- ily considered and determined the question of its own ...
... determine the incidental question there pre- sented , namely , his asserted sole heirship . He says that when the court undertook to determine that incidental issue , it necessar- ily considered and determined the question of its own ...
Página 1049
... determine weight to be given their testimony , to draw inferences from facts established , and to re- solve conflicts in evidence . - Brown v . American Nat . Bank , 197 F.2d 911 . 406.3 ( 3 ) . Conflicting or undisputed evi- dence ...
... determine weight to be given their testimony , to draw inferences from facts established , and to re- solve conflicts in evidence . - Brown v . American Nat . Bank , 197 F.2d 911 . 406.3 ( 3 ) . Conflicting or undisputed evi- dence ...
Contenido
TABLE OF CONTENTS | 1 |
Judges VII | 21 |
Supreme Court Rules XLVII | 22 |
Otras 2 secciones no mostradas
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
action affirmed Air Freight alleged amended amount appellant appellant's appellee application Aruba Asst automobile Board cause certiorari charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 197 City Civil claim Commission Commissioner Company complaint contract Corp corporation counsel Court of Appeals damages decision defendant defendant's denied dismissed District Court Elekta employees evidence F.Supp fact Federal filed finding granted held income insured interest Internal Revenue issue judgment June June 25 jurisdiction jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed Lanham Act lease liability ment motion negligence operation opinion parties patent payment pen points petition petitioner plaintiff prior prior art proceeding purchase question reasonable record rule S.Ct Section Stat statute suit supra taxpayer testimony tion trade-mark trial court U. S. Atty Union United States Attorney United States Court United States District verdict violation Washington York York City