Ir a convict who, by ancient law, ab- jured the realm, did not use due di- ligence to perform this undertak- ing, he was amenable to his origi- nal sentence, Aickle's case......393
is committed, Easterby and Mac- farlane's case........ ........950
3 But now by 43 Geo. III. c. 113. which repeals the above statutes, accessaries before the fact, shall suffer death, and the offence be tried by the Admiralty, or at common law, as the fact shall be committed on land or at sea ......................952
4 Accessaries before the fact in bur- glary, are ousted of clergy by 3 W. & M. c. 9............ ......919
A receiver of stolen goods may be tried for the misdemeanor, though the principal might have been taken, Rer v. Wilkes .............103 An accessary indicted, after the conviction of the principal, for the felony of receiving stolen goods, may controvert the guilt of the prin- cipal, notwithstanding the record of his conviction; and if it appear that the goods were taken under circumstances which do not amount to larceny, the accessary shall be acquitted, Smith's case ..........288
So if a person be indicted for having suborned another to take a false oath; the conviction of the false swearer may be controverted by the suborn- er, and the prosecutor put to prove that the conviction of the principal was legal, Reilly's case ......... 455
A prisoner may be convicted on
the single, uncorroborated testi-
mony of an accomplice, Atwood's
........464
For as an accomplice is a compe- tent witness, the consequence is in- evitable that if the Jury believe him, his testimony needs no confirma- tion, Jones's case ..........466, notis.
8 This is not new law; for Lord Hale
gives several instances of convic-
tions on the evidence of accom-
plices
........466
And the practice of not calling upon
a prisoner to defend himself against
the single uncorroborated testimony
of an accomplice, is rather matter
of discretion with the Court, than
a general rule of law, Durham's case,
478
10 And therefore judges will advise a
jury not to believe an accomplice,
unless his testimony be confirmed,
466, notis.
11 An accomplice, as a second in a duel, may refuse to give evidence on the trial of the principal, but his testimony may be received as a witness for the Crown, and if once sworn he must disclose the whole truth, although he may thereby involve himself in the guilt of the transaction, England's case.....767
12 An accomplice present, aiding and
assisting in murder may be con-
victed, and the principal in the
first degree acquitted, if the Jury
find that he did the fact, and the
indictment charge that both of them
did the murder, Shaw's case ...
360
See Evidence.
By 28 Hen. VIII. c. 15. all trea-
sons, felonies, robberies, murders
and confederacies, committed in
or upon THE SEA, or in any ha-
ven, river, creek or place, where
the admiral has, or pretends to have
power, authority, or jurisdiction,
shall be inquired, tried, heard, de-
termined, and judged in such shires
and places in the realm, as shall be
limited by the King's commission,
&c. Bruce's case
2 If a loaded pistol be fired from the
land, at a distance of 100 yards
from the sea, and a man is malici-
ously shot in the sea 100 yards from
the shore, the offender shall be tried
in the Admiralty Court, and not at
common law, Coombe's case....388
3 On an indictment for burglary the prisoner may be acquitted of the breaking, and found guilty of steal- 4 ing in the dwelling-house, to the amount of 40 shillings, although there is no special and independent count in the indictment, on 12 Ann. c. 7. Overand's case......88
But by 43 Geo. III. c. 113. the sta-
tutes 4 Geo. I. c. 12. and 11 Geo. I,
c. 21. are repealed, and it is en-
acted, that if any person shall wil-
fully cast away or destroy any ves-
sel, or counsel any person, or direct
the same to be done, &c. with intent
to prejudice the owner or under-
writer, he shall suffer death without
clergy; the principal and accessary
before the fact to be tried as the
offence may be respectively com-
mitted, on shore or on the sea..952
5 Before this statute accessaries before the fact on shore, to a wilful wreck on the High Seas, were not triable by the Admiralty, Easterby's case,
3 So "witness received" on the back 6 By 39 Geo. III. c. 37. after reciting
28 Hen. VIII. c. 15. and declaring
that it is expedient that other of-
fences committed at sea should be
tried under that statute, enacts,
that all and every offence which
after the passing of the act, shall be
committed at sea, shall be offences
of the same nature, and liable to
the same punishment, as if they had
been committed on shore, and shall
be tried under 28 Hen. VIII. c. 15.
Bruce's case
........1093
7 The Admiralty, and the common
law courts, have a concurrent juris-
diction in murders, &c. committed
in any of the havens, rivers or
creeks of this realm, Bruce's case.
1093
8 Therefore a murder committed in
Milford Haven, is triable in the
Admiralty Court, ibid..........1093
1 An agent, as for instance a stock-
broker who receives from his prin-
cipal a draft on a banker which he
receives the amount of in bank-notes,
for the express purpose of being laid
out in the purchase of exchequer
bills or other securities, but instead
of so doing he only applies part of
the property according to the direc-
tions of the principal, and fraudu-
lently runs away with the residue,
is not thereby guilty of larceny at
common law, Walsh's case ....1054
2 But now by the 52 Geo. III. c. 63.
s. 1. if any of the cited securities
shall be deposited for safe custody
with any banker, merchant, broker, 5
attorney or other AGENT of any de-
scription whatsoever, and such agent
shall violate the trust by converting
them, without authority, to his own
use, he shall be guilty of a misde-
..1082, notis.
3 By 52 Geo. III. c. 63. s. 2. if any
such AGENT into whose hands the
enumerated instruments shall be
AIDERS AND ABETTORS.
1 The words, abetting and com-
munding an escape," do not import
there was an actual escape; but the
words" aiding and assisting an
escape" do, Tilley's case .......670
2 Aiders and abettors in an illegal act
are not answerable for a homicide,
unless it be committed in prose-
cution of such illegal act, Rex v.
Hodgson.....
........6
3 Aiders and abettors are not con-
structively within the meaning of a
statute, which takes away the be-
nefit of clergy from such as shall be found guilty of the offence, Bayne's case
4 Aiders and abettors in feloniously
obtaining money by the practice of
ring-dropping, are principal offend-
ers, Moor's case..........
............314
If two persons be indicted for mur-
der, the one as principal in the first
degree, the other as present aiding
and abetting the fact, the Jury may
find the person charged in the
second degree GUILTY of the fact,
and acquit the other, Taylor and
Shaw's case ........................360
placed, with an order in writing to 1 If the addition to a prisoner's name
« AnteriorContinuar » |