Price A Monthly Magazine for Thinking Men and Women. interest by prominent Australian public men. The Individualist principles of this Magazine are expressed in the following passag from the article on "Policy" in the opening number: "We shall regard it as a settle principle of government that the State exists primarily for the protection of the live and liberties of all its citizens, as also of their fegally-acquired savings and possessions and that all forms of legislation which have the effect of appropriating the property all for the benefit of a class, the property of a class for the benefit of all, or the pr perty of one class for the benefit of another class, are opposed to the true purpos and best spirit of sound government." Six Shillings per annum post paid to all parts of Great Britain and Ireland. Address-MANAGER "UNITED AUSTRALIA," Premier Buildings, Collins Stree Melbourne, Victoria. Dictionnaire du Commerce DE L'INDUSTRIE, ET DE LA BANQUE. Edited by YVES GUYOT and A. RAFFALOVICH. In Two Volumes. Price 50 frand in paper cover, 58 francs in cloth. Paris: GUILLAUMIN ET CIE, 14, Rue Richelieu. Rivista Italiana di Sociologia (Fascicoli bimestrali di circa 140 pagine.) Scienze Sociali, Politiche e Morali, Biologia, Psicologia, Antropologia, Pedagogia, Igiene, Storia della Cultura. CONSIGLIO DIRETTIVO-A. Bosco, G. Cavaglieri, S. Cognetti de Martiis, G. Sergi Abbonamento Annuo-Per l'Italia Lire 10. Per gli Stati dell'Unione DIREZIONE E AMMINISTRAZIONE della "RIVISTA ITALIANA DI Sociologia," THE Englishwoman's Review OF SOCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND EDUCATIONAL Started in 1859 as Englishwoman's Journal. Edited by HELEN BLACKBURN and ANTOINETTE M. MACKENZIE. The Review endeavours to collect quarter by quarter all that is of most value for reference and record in regard to the work of women, in all parts of the world. Published quarterly-15th January, April, July, and October. Subscriptions for the year and orders for single copies may be sent to Miss EDITH HARE, Secretary, Office of the Englishwoman's Review, 22, Berners Street, London, W., or to the Publishers, Messrs. Williams and Norgate, 14, Henrietta Street, Covent Garden, London, W.C. THE LIBERTY REVIEW LEGISLATIVE JULY, 1902. NEW, TRUE-OR NEITHER. WHAT is called public business in Parliament consists in THE the main of forcing upon the country measures the country has never asked for, would never ask for, and does not want. And the daily journals would have us believe that the country is getting impatient, if not disgusted, at the manner in which this public business is being muddled by His Majesty's Ministers. As a matter of fact, the country does not care a brass farthing for all this Parliamentary tomfoolery, and everybody except the politicians would be perfectly satisfied if Parliament did not pass a single measure during the next fifty years other than those absolutely necessary for carrying on the purely Governmental affairs of the realm and its dependencies. If, as the lobby correspondent of the Times declares, the new rules of procedure in the House of Commons have not been the success which was hoped, that these rules do not tend to facilitate the business of unnecessary law-making, all the better for the country, since most of this lawmaking is inimical to individual freedom, disastrous in its effects upon commerce and industry, and generally demoralising in its results upon the people at large. What England is in most need of to-day is the personal activity of the people in the management of their personal affairs. The prosperity of the nation depends upon the enterprise of the people as a whole. Every act of the legislature which checks that activity or fetters that enterprise is an evil. Therefore, the legislative muddle is a good thing; and we trust it may continue until legislators themselves realise that it is only by a strict observance of the true functions of government that Parliament can carry on its proper business and be of benefit to the nation. Then, and not till then, will the House of Commons be able to conduct its business in a manner which will not make that assembly a byword and a reproach among practical men. THE GOVERNMENT LICENSING BILL. The Daily Chronicle pretends that it is impossible to understand why certain members of the House of Commons who have no connection with the liquor trade and hold no brief for it should have systematically opposed the Government Licensing Bill, "which has been distinguished throughout by a spirit of compromise, and which has been 13108.7. |