Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[graphic]

TABLE 17.-Injunctive proceedings brought by the Commission which were pending during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1963-Continued

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[graphic]

July 3, 1962

Sec. 15(c)(3) and Rule 15c3-| Complaint and request for appointment of a receiver entered July 3, 1962.
1, 1934 Act.
Final judgment entered as to both defendants by consent, July 3, 1962.
Pending as to receiver.

Dec. 8, 1961 Secs. 15(c) (1), 15(c)(3) and
17(a), and Rules 15c1-2,
15c3-1 and 17a-3, 1934 Act.

Mar. 5, 1963 Secs. 17(a), 1933 Act, and 7,
17(a) and 4 and Rules
17a-3 and 17a-5, 1934 Act.
Sec. 17(a), 1933 Act..

Secs. 17(a) (2) and 17(a) (3),
1933 Act.

Secs. 5(a) and 5(c) 1933 Act..

Secs. 15(a) and 17(a), Rule
17a-3, 1934 Act.

Final judgment by consent as to both defendants, and order appointing re-
ceiver entered Dec. 11, 1961. Order entered discharging 1 defendant,
individually, from the final judgment and receivership. Order entered
discharging equity receiver. Closed.

Complaint and request for appointment of a receiver filed Mar. 5, 1963.
Order entered Mar. 6, 1963, appointing receiver. Preliminary injunction
entered as to 3 defendants Apr. 10, 1963. Pending.

Complaint filed Apr. 12, 1963. Preliminary injunction entered May 3,
1963, as to 1 defendant. Pending.

Summons and complaint filed July 24, 1961. Order entered dismissing the
action as to both defendants, Jan. 7, 1963. Closed.
Complaint filed June 22, 1962. Final judgment by consent as to 4 defend-
ants entered Aug. 3, 1962. Order entered dismissing the action as to 3
defendants Aug. 3, 1962. Closed.

Summons and complaint filed June 7, 1962. Final judgment by consent
entered as to 2 defendants Feb. 20, 1963. Final judgment by default as
to 1 defendant entered May 31, 1963. Pending.

Secs. 5(a) and 5(c) and Sec. Complaint filed Apr. 12, 1962. Final judgments by consent as to 5 defend-
17(a), 1933 Act.
ants entered Apr. 27, 1962, and action dismissed as to 1 defendant. Final
judgments by consent as to 2 defendants entered June 18, 1962, and as to
1 defendant July 18, 1962. Final judgment by consent as to 2 defendants
entered May 21, 1963. Closed.
Sec. 15(c)(3) and Rule 15c3-1, Note of issue filed Aug. 6, 1958. Stipulation dismissing action as to both
1934 Act.
defendants entered Mar. 5, 1963. Closed.

[blocks in formation]

Apr. 12, 1963
July 24, 1961

[blocks in formation]

June 22, 1962

[blocks in formation]

717-94364

Zwang & Co., Inc.,
Benjamin.

2

Southern District Sept. 27, 1956 of New York.

TABLE 18.-Proceedings by the Commission to enforce subpoenas pending during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1963

Status of case

Order Aug. 17, 1962, directing respondent to show cause why order should
not issue requiring compliance with subpoena. Motion by respondents
to transfer action to the U.S. District Court in Colorado, filed Aug. 24,
1962. Order entered Sept. 5, 1962, granting said motion. Closed by
consolidation with related action entitled S.E.C. v. Forrest Parrott.
Order Nov. 7, 1962, directing respondent to show cause why order should
not issue requiring compliance with subpoena. Order dismissing action
Nov. 28, 1962. Closed.

Application June 14, 1963, for an order directing respondent to show cause
why an order should not issue requiring compliance with subpoena
duces tecum. Pending.

Order Feb. 11, 1963, directing respondent to show cause why order should
not issue requiring compliance with subpoena. Order to show cause
returnable Feb. 27, 1963. Respondent complied with the subpoena
duces tecum. Action dismissed Mar. 29, 1963. Closed.

Order July 18, 1962, directing respondent to show cause why order should
not issue requiring compliance with subpoena. Motion to dismiss and
order dismissing action Oct. 25, 1962. Closed.

Application May 7, 1963, for an order directing respondent to show cause
why an order should not issue requiring compliance with subpoena.
Closed.

[graphic]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Application Apr. 5, 1963, for an order directing respondents to show cause
why order should not issue requiring compliance with subpoena. Order
entered Apr. 23, 1963, compelling respondents to comply with Commission
subpoena. Closed.

Application Sept. 20, 1962, for an order directing respondents to show cause
why order should not issue requiring compliance with subpoena. Order
entered consolidating related subpoena action entitled S.E.C. v. Alfred 0.
Brehmer with S. E. C. v. Forrest Parrott. Notice of appeal filed from
order, dated Apr. 24, 1963, conditioning enforcement of subpoena. Briefs
filed. Pending.

Order Sept. 28, 1962, directing respondent to show cause why an order should
not issue requiring compliance with subpoena. Order entered Dec. 5,
1962, compelling respondent to comply with order of Sept. 28, 1962. No-
tice of appeal filed from order entered Dec. 5, 1962. Pending.

Order Sept. 21, 1961, directing respondent to show cause why an orders hould
not issue requiring compliance with subpoena. Commission's motion to
dismiss granted. Closed.

Order June 13, 1962, directing respondent to show cause why order should
not issue requiring compliance with subpoena. Order to show cause
returnable July 5, 1962. Pending.
Order Aug. 17, 1962, directing respondent to show cause why order should
not issue requiring compliance with subpoena. Order to show cause
returnable Aug. 31, 1962. Pending.

Application for an order compelling respondents to comply with subpoena issued. Order Nov. 27, 1962, directing respondents to comply with Commission subpoena. Closed.

[graphic]

TABLE 19.-Actions pending during fiscal year ended June 30, 1963, to enforce voluntary plans under Section 11(e) to comply with Section 11(b) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935

U.S. District Court

Initiating papers filed
July 19, 1960.

Name of case

[blocks in formation]

Status of case

Application filed by Commission for an order enforcing the carrying out of a plan pursuant
to Sec. 11(d) and 18(f) of the 1935 Act as per Commission order of July 14, 1960.
Sept. 2, 1960, approving and enforcing plan with the court taking jurisdiction and posses-
sion of Arkansas Fuel Oil Corp. and its assets. Plan consummated Dec. 2, 1960. Fees
and expenses hearings held. Record thereon closed Dec. 5, 1961. Certain fees approved
and paid. Certain other fee claims pending. Pending.

Reopened June 25, 1956... Petition filed June 25, 1956, by Cities Service Company for an order requiring Elias Auer-
back to show cause why he should not be adjudged in comtempt of order entered Jan. 29,
1953. Petition filed by Louis E. Marron July 23, 1956, seeking intervention. Order
Oct. 26, 1956, denying petition for intervention but directing the petitioner be permitted
to appear amicus curiae. This action was mooted by the claims settlement approved and
enforced as a part of the Sec. 11(d) plan and consummated Dec. 2, 1960. Closed.
Application filed by Commission for an order enforcing the carrying out of an amended plan
pursuant to Sec. 11(e) of the 1935 Act as per Commission order of Nov. 5, 1962, and to
enjoin interference with the plan. Order Dec. 13, 1962, approving and enforcing the
amended plan. Pending.

[graphic]

Nov. 14, 1962.

Eastern District of Reopened Oct. 14, 1960. New York.

Eastern District of
Louisiana.

Reopened Aug. 12, 1960.

Application by Long Island Lighting Co. for an order extending time for the exchange of its
old stock for the new stock provided in the plan of consolidation from Oct. 24, 1960 to
Oct. 24, 1962. Order Oct. 19, 1960, granting application with Commission's consent
attached. Closed.

Supplemental application filed by Commission for an order enforcing the carrying out of
amendments to a plan pursuant to Sec. 11(e) and 18(f) of the 1935 Act approved by Com-
mission order of Aug. 11, 1960, and to enjoin interference with amended plan.
Sept. 14, 1960, approving and enforcing amendments to the plan. Pending, fu

« AnteriorContinuar »