...is mortal. The mortality of John, Thomas, and Company, is, after all, the whole evidence we have for the mortality of the Duke of Wellington. Not one iota is added to the proof hy interpolating a general propositinn. Since the individual cases are all the evidence we can possess...

...is mortal. The mortality of John, Thomas, and Company, is, after all, the whole evidence we have for the mortality of the Duke of Wellington. Not one iota...the proof by interpolating a general proposition. Since the individual cases are all the evidence we can possess ; evidence which no logical form into...

...ayons de la (1) The mortality of John, Thomas and company is, after all, the whole evidence we have for the mortality of the duke of Wellington. Not one iota...the proof by interpolating a general proposition. Since the individual cases are all the evidence we can possess, evidence which no logical form into...

...après tout 1. The mortality of John, Thomas and company is, after ail, the whole evidence we have for the mortality of the duke of Wellington. Not one iota...the proof by interpolating a general proposition. Since the individual cases are ail the evidence we can possess, evidence which no logical form into...

...la (I) The mortality of John, Thomas and company is, after ail, the whole evidence we have for Ihe mortality of the duke of Wellington. Not one iota...the proof by interpolating a general proposition. Since Ihe imlividual cases are ail Ihe evidence vve can possess, evidence which no logical forni into...

...ayons de la (1) The mortality of John, Thomas and company is, after ail, the whole evidence we have for the mortality of the duke of Wellington. Not one iota is added to the proof by interpotating a general proposition. Since the individual cases are ail Ihe evidence we can possess,...

...Wellington is mortal. The mortality of John, Thomas, and company, is, after all, the whole evidence we Lave of the mortality of the Duke of Wellington. Not one...will burn." The only use of a general proposition, Mill contends, is simply to furnish collateral security forthe cor rectncss of our inference. Remarks...

...Wellington is mortal. The mortality of *ohn, Thomas, and company, is, after all, the whole evidence we have of the mortality of the Duke of "Wellington....this sort. The child burning his fingers, reasons thna: "That tire burnt me, therefore this will." He does not generalize, "All fire burns; this is fire...

...another. " The mortality of John Thomas and Company is, after all, the -whole evidence wo have for the mortality of the Duke of Wellington. Not one iota is added to the proof by the interpolation of a general proposition. Since the individual cases ara all tho evidence we can...

...Wellington is mortal. The mortality of •> olin, Thomas, and company, is, after all, the whole evidence we have of the mortality of the Duke of Wellington. Not...will burn." The only use of a general proposition, Mill contends, is simply to furnish collateral security for the cor rectness of our inference. Remarks...