15. Powell, G. H. 1913. COOPERATION IN AGRICULTURE. 327 pp. New York, Macmillan Company. (Rural Science Series.)

Legal features of cooperative organizations in agriculture, pp. 40-77.

16. Williams, W. M.

1923. LAWS THAT AFFECT COOPERATIVE
American Institute of Agriculture.

MARKETING. 31 pp. Chicago,

Government Publications

17. Bassett, C. E., and Jesness, O. B.

1918. COOPERATIVE ORGANIZATION BY-LAWS. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bul. 541. 23 pp.

18. Hulbert, Lyman S.

19.

20.

1926. COOPERATIVE MARKETING RECOGNIZED IN NUMEROUS LAWS. U. S. Dept. Agr. Yearbook, 1926, pp. 241–244.

1929. LEGAL PHASES OF COOPERATIVE

Dept. Bul. 1106, 126 pp.

and Bain, H. M.

ASSOCIATIONS. U. S. Dept. Agr.

Washington, D. C., U. S.

1922-29. SUMMARY OF CASES AND DECISIONS ON LEGAL PHASES OF COOP-
ERATION. 6 pts., mimeographed.
Dept. of Agr., Bureau of Agr. Econ.

21. Jesness, O. B., and Kerr, W. H.

1917. COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AND MARKETING ORGANIZATIONS AMONG FARMERS IN THE UNITED STATES. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bul. 547.

A discussion and survey of cooperative laws, pp. 61-78.

22. Ostrolenk, Bernhard, and Tereshtenko, V. J.

1940. ABSTRACTS OF THE LAWS PERTAINING TO COOPERATION IN THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, ITS POSSESSIONS AND TERRITORIES.
350 pp.,

mimeographed. New York, Work Projects Administration.

23. Tershtenko, V. J.

1941. BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REVIEW OF LITERATURE ON LEGAL PHASES OF COOPERATION. 242 pp., mimeographed. New York, Work Projects Administration.

24. United States Federal Trade Commission.

25.

1926. REPORT OF FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ON THE AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY. 129 pp. Washington, D. C. (69th Cong., 1st Sess., S. Doc. 34).

Cooperative marketing laws, pp. 26–32.

1928. REPORT OF FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ON COOPERATIVE MARKETING. 721 pp. Washington, D. C. (70th Cong., 1st Sess., S. Doc. 95) The development of cooperative law, pp. 323-335.

26. United States Labor Department.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

1917. LABOR LEGISLATION IN 1917. U. S. Labor Dept. Bul. 244, 430 pp. Cooperative organizations, pp. 49–50.

1922. NEW

LAW AUTHORIZING FORMATION OF COOPERATIVE MARKETING

ASSOCIATIONS. Monthly Labor Review 14:832-833.

1923. LIABILITY OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX. Monthly Labor Review 17:513-516.

1924. COURT DECISIONS AS TO CONTRACTS WITH COOPERATIVE MARKETING Monthly Labor Review 19:166-169.

ASSOCIATIONS.

1925. COOPERATIVE LEGISLATION IN THE UNITED STATES. Monthly Labor

Review 20:426-429.

1925. COURT DECISION AS TO MINNESOTA COOPERATIVE
Monthly Labor Review 21:630–631.

MARKETING ACT.

1925. COURT DECISIONS RELATING TO COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATIONS. Monthly Labor Review 20:911-913.

1926. COURT DECISIONS AS TO CONTRACTS WITH COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS. Monthly Labor Review 22:1045-1049.

34. United States Labor Department-Continued

35.

36.

37.

1927. CONSTITUTIONALITY OF FLORIDA COOPERATIVE
Monthly Labor Review 25:540-541.

MARKETING ACT.

1928. SUPREME COURT DECISION ON COOPERATIVE MARKETING ACT. Monthly Labor Review 27:286–287.

1939. FARMERS' COOPERATIVES UNDER WAGE AND HOUR ACT. Monthly Labor Review 48:1329-1330.

1939. POSITIONS OF COOPERATIVES UNDER WAGE AND HOUR ACT. Monthly Labor Review 48:586.

Periodicals and Other References

1913. IMPORTANT DECISION ΤΟ COOPERATIVE

38. Anonymous.

39.

40.

41.

42.

43.

44.

45.

46.

47.

48.

49.

50.

51.

Farmer 38:798.

KATCHEWAN.

ASSOCIATIONS. Wallace's

1922. CONTRACTS WITH AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATIONS IN SAS(Gnaedinger v. Turtleford Grain Growers Cooperative Ass'n Ltd. 1 W. W. R. 936.) Canadian Law Times 42:381383.

1922. FARMERS' COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATIONS.

470-473.

Columbia Law Review 22:

1923. AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATIONS EXAMINED AND HELD OF GREAT VALUE AND NOT IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE; INJUNCTION TO ENFORCE CONTRACT WITH THE GROWER SUSTAINED. Law and Labor 5:196-198.

1923. AS TO THE MINNESOTA COOPERATIVE MARKETING LAW. Cooperative Manager and Farmer 12:24-25.

1923. COOPERATIVE ACT UPHELD BY STATE SUPREME COURT. American Cooperative Journal 18:31.

1923. COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATION MAY ENFORCE ITS CONTRACTS WITH ITS MEMBERS BY INJUNCTION. Law and Labor 5:198-199. 1923. COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF AGREEMENT WITH GROWER DENIED: Texas Farm Bureau Cotton Association v. Stovall, 113 Tex. 273, 253 S. W. 1101, reversing (Tex. Civ. App.) 248 S. W. 1109; Hollingsworth v. Texas Hay Association, 246 S. W. 1068. (Tex. Civ. App.). Harvard Law Review 37: 145-148.

1923. OPPOSITION TO COOPERATIVE MARKETING. Yale Law Journal 32:819824.

1923. PURPOSE OF SHERMAN ACT, COMBINATION BETWEEN PRODUCERS, ILLEGALITY OF TRADE ASSOCIATIONS. St. Louis Law Review 9:67-68. 1923. SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, DEFENSES, MUTUALITY, COOPERATIVE MARKETING AGREEMENTS. Harvard Law Review 37:162.

1923. SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF COOPERATIVE MARKETING AGREEMENTS. Harvard Law Review 37: 145-148.

1924. AGRICULTURE, COOPERATIVE MARKETING, ASSOCIATION, CONTRACTS, IN

JUNCTION, SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, MONOPOLIES, VALIDITY OF AND
REMEDIES FOR BREACH OF MARKETING CONTRACT. Minnesota Law
Review 8: 158.

1924. CONTRACTS SPECIFICALLY ENFORCEABLE, CONTRACTS FOR THE COOPER

ATIVE SYSTEM OF DISTRIBUTION OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS UNDER SECTION 653 PP CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE. California Law Review 12:146-151.

52. Anonymous-Continued

1924. COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS AS COMBINATIONS IN REHarvard Law Review 38: 87-92.

STRAINT OF TRADE.

56.

57.

58.

59.

60.

Laws on cooperation, pp. 70–82.

1925. COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS, EQUITABle relief to SECURE PERFORMANCE OF EXCLUSIVE SALE AGREEMENT. Minnesota Law Review 9: 677-678.

1925. THE LAW AND COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS. Congressional Digest 4:259–260.

1925. SOUND PRINCIPLES IN COOPERATIVE LEGISLATION. Annals of the Amer. Aca. of Pol. and Soc. Sci. 117:227-230.

1925. SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA HOLDS THAT PART OF THE "SAPIRO

PLAN" MARKETING LAW IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL; INDEPENDENT

DEALER CAN BUY FROM MEMBER OF COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION.

Cooperative Manager and Farmer 14:52-53.

1926. CONSTITUTIONALITY OF COOPERATIVE MARKETING ACTS: (Minnesota Wheat Growers' Coop. Marketing Association v. Radke and v. Commander Elev. Co., 163 Minn., 403, 204 N. W. 314). Iowa Law Review 11:375–398.

1926. COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS, LEGALITY AT COMMON LAW: (Atkinson v. Colorado Wheat Growers' Association, 77 Colo. 559, 38 Pac. 1117). Illinois Law Review 20: 619; Texas Law Review 4:266.

61.

1926. COOPERATIVE MARKETING BODIES.

62.

63.

Canadian Bar Review 4:344-346.

1926. FARMERS' COOPERATIVES AND The federal TRADE COMMISSION. New Republic 45:346–347.

1926. GROWERS' CONTRACTS WITH COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATION. Nebraska Law Bulletin 4:361-364.

64.

1926. SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF COOPERATIVE MARKETING AGREEMENT. Washington Law Review 1:288.

65.

66.

1928. CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATUTE ALLOWING COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS. Virginia Law Review 14:226–227.

1928. CONTRACTS, EFFECT OF ILLEGALITY, SUBSEQUENT VALIDATING STATUTE. Michigan Law Review 26:443-444.

71.

1928. COOPERATIVE MARKETING, BREACH OF CONTRACT, PENALTY OR LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. Yale Law Journal 38: 259–261.

1928. COOPERATIVE MARKETING CONTRACTS.

453-454.

California Law Review 16:

1928. EXEMPTION OF COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATION FROM STATE ANTI-TRUST LAWS. Columbia Law Review 28: 815.

1928. KENTUCKY COOPERATIVE MARKETING ACT DECLARED CONSTITUTIONAL. Congressional Digest 7: 138-139.

72. Anonymous-Continued

73.

74.

75.

1928. VALIDITY OF STATUTES PENALIZING THE INDUCING OF MEMBERS OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES TO BREAK CONTRACTS. Dakota Law Review 2: 395–399.

1929. COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS, EXEMPTIONS, EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS. Columbia Law Review, 29: 833-834.

1929. VALIDITY OF STATUTES PENALIZING THE INDUCING OF MEMBERS OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES TO BREAK CONTRACTS. Tennessee Law Review 7: 123-127; Texas Law Review 7: 306–307.

1930. THE AFFECTING OF FARMERS' COOPERATIVES WITH THE PUBLIC INTEREST. Yale Law Journal 40: 288-291.

1931. AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BILL. Law Times 171: 135.

76.

77.

1931. MARKETING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE.

78.

79.

80.

Solicitors Journal 75: 622.

1932. COMPETITION AND MONOPOLY UNDER THE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING ACT. Yale Law Journal 41: 888-894.

1932. WHO MAY BECOME BANKRUPT, CORPORATIONS, COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS? Harvard Law Review 46: 326-327.

1933. INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACTS EMPLOYED BY COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS. Yale Law Journal 43: 119–127.

83.

1933. MILK MARKETING BOARD PENALTIES.

84.

85.

86.

Law Times 176: 375-376.

1933. OFFENSES AND PENALTIES UNDER THE MILK MARKETING SCHEME. Solicitors Journal 77:808.

1933. WHO MAY BECOME BANKRUPT, CORPORATIONS, COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS? Michigan Law Review 31:982.

1934. COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS, ENJOINING PARTICIPATION IN BREACH OF CONTRACT. New York University Law Quarterly Review 12:147-148; Columbia Law Review 34:1360–1361.

1935. EFFECT OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SCHEMES ON CONTRACTS. Solicitors Journal 79:868.

1935. LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES. Law Times 179:41. 1935. SCHEMES UNDER THE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING ACT. Solicitors Journal 79:616–617.

1936. AGRICULTURAL ADJUSTMENT AND MARKETING CONTROL. Yale Law Journal 46: 130-142.

1937. EFFECT OF AGREEMENT TO FINANCE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING ON BANK'S LIABILITY TO PAYEE ON CHECK. Yale Law Journal 46: 483-492.

1937. MARKETING STRUCTURE AND JUDICIAL PROTECTION OF THE CONSUMER. Columbia Law Review 37:77-86.

95. Anonymous-Continued

96.

97.

98.

99.

1937. MARKETING UNDER THE ROBINSON-PATMAN ACT. Illinois Law Review 31:907-942.

1937. MODERN TRENDS IN MARKETING AND THE ROBINSON-PATMAN ACT. Trade Regulations Review 2:1-5.

1939. ANTI-TRUST PROSECUTIONS AND THE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING ACT. Illinois Law Review 34:345-348.

1939. DUE PROCESS, EQUALIZATION POOL IN MILK MARKETING HELD CONSTITUTIONAL. Harvard Law Review 53: 136-137.

1939. FEDERAL MILK CONTROL AND THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 87:870-872.

100. American Institute of Cooperation.

1925. CONFERENCE ON LEGAL PROBLEMS.

101. Arndt, S. M.

American Cooperation, 1925, 1:

379-393. Washington, D. C., American Institute of Cooperation

1920. LAW OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS. California Law Review 8:281-299, 384-403; 9:44–55.

102. Arnold, C. F.

1930. CAN THE COURTS AID COOPERATIVE MARKETING? Minnesota Law Review 15:40–74.

103. Ballantine, W.

1923. COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS. Minnesota Law Review 8: 1-27.

104. Brown, E., Jr.

1923. COOPERATIVE MARKETING OF TOBACCO. North Carolina Law Review 1:216-222.

105. Brown, M.

1936. AN EXPERIMENT IN COMPULSORY COOPERATION.
UCTS MARKETING ACT, 1934 (LEGISLATION).
14:71-82.

106. Bruce, A. A.

107.

108.

109.

THE NATIONAL PROD

Canadian Bar Review

1926. ANTI-TRUST ACT, EXCEPTION IN FAVOR OF "AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 74:743-744; Illinois Law Review 21:379.

1926. STATE GRAIN INSPECTION AND PRICE REGULATION AND THE COOPERATIVE MOVEMENT. Illinois Law Review 21:50-54.

1928. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, PRICE DISCRIMINATION, FARMERS' COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES. Illinois Law Review 22:533–537.

1928. VALIDITY OF STATUTES PENALIZING THE INDUCING OF MEMBERS OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES TO BREAK CONTRACTS. Illinois Law Review 23:282.

110. Burlingame, L. J.

1924. INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT, LEGALITY OF COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS. Wisconsin Law Review 2:478-485.

111. Bunn, Charles.

1941. CONSUMERS' COOPERATIVES AND PRICE FIXING LAWS.

Review 40:165–173.

112. Cerini, Floyd B.

Michigan Law

1938. UTAH PIONEERS IN ADOPTING THE UNIFORM COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION STATUTE. Cooperative Journal 12:41-49.

113. Chafee, Z., Jr.

1930. INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF ASSOCIATIONS NOT FOR PROFIT. Harvard Law Review 43:993-1029.