...we have arrived at these general conclusions : First, The shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them, were not granted by the Constitution to...States, but were reserved to the states respectively. Secondly, The new states have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over this subject as the...

...limits. Again, say the court, the shores of the navigable waters and the soil over which the tide ffows, were not granted by the constitution to the United...States, but were reserved to the States respectively ; and the rights, sovereignty and jurisdiction of the new States over this subject, is co-extensive...

...irresistible. First, That the mines of gold and silver and of the baser metals with which either is connected, were not granted by the constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the states within whose territorial limits they are situated respectively: Secondly, The new states have the same...

...irresistable. First, That the mines of gold and silver and of the baser inetals with which either is connected, were not granted by the constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the states within whose territorial limits they are situated respectively : / .. Secondly, The new states have...

...irresistable. First, That the mines of gold and silver and of the baser metals with which either is connected, were not granted by the constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the states within whose territorial limits they are situated respectively : Secondly, The new states have the...

...Alabama which was below usual high-water mark, at the time Alabama was admitted into the Union. That the shores of navigable waters, and the soil under...States, but were reserved to the states respectively ; and that the new states have the same rights, sovereignty and jurisdiction over the subject as the...

...equitable relief ; and his decree is now assigned as error. BOYLES & OVERALL, for appellants. — 1. The shores of navigable waters, and the soil under them, were not granted to the United States by the constitution, but were reserved to the several States respectively ; and...

...land in any State admitted into the Union, which was below high water mark ; that the shores of all navigable waters, and the soil under them, were Not granted by the constitution, but were reserved by the States respectively, and that the new States have the same rights, sovereignty...

...to grant lands, below high-water mark, in any State admitted into the Union ; that the shores of all navigable waters, and the soil under them were not granted by the Constitution, but were reserved by the States respectively, and that the neio States have the same rights, svereignty...

...first place, the Supreme Court has decided, in the case of Pollard v. Hagan, (iii Howard, 212,) that the shores of navigable waters, and the soil under...States, but were reserved to the States respectively ; and the new States have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over this subject as the original...