Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 79
Página 103
( C. V. Spratley , Jr. , U. S. Atty . , on the brief ) for appellee , United States . Before SOBELOFF , Chief Judge , BRYAN , Circuit Judge , and HARRY E. WATKINS , District Judge . HARRY Judge . E. WATKINS , District Defendants ...
( C. V. Spratley , Jr. , U. S. Atty . , on the brief ) for appellee , United States . Before SOBELOFF , Chief Judge , BRYAN , Circuit Judge , and HARRY E. WATKINS , District Judge . HARRY Judge . E. WATKINS , District Defendants ...
Página 582
Mr. David Rein , Washington , D. C. , with whom Mr. Joseph Forer , Washing- ton , D. C. , was on the brief , for appellant . Mr. Frank Q. Nebeker , Asst . U. S. At- ty . , for appellees . Mr. David C. Acheson , U. S. Atty . , and Messrs ...
Mr. David Rein , Washington , D. C. , with whom Mr. Joseph Forer , Washing- ton , D. C. , was on the brief , for appellant . Mr. Frank Q. Nebeker , Asst . U. S. At- ty . , for appellees . Mr. David C. Acheson , U. S. Atty . , and Messrs ...
Página 596
Marvin Garbis , Washington , D. C. , and Ronald L. Lenkin , West Hyatts- ville , Md . , were also on the brief for appellant . Mr. William H. Willcox , Asst . U. S. Atty . , with whom Messrs . David C. Acheson , U. S. Atty . , and Frank ...
Marvin Garbis , Washington , D. C. , and Ronald L. Lenkin , West Hyatts- ville , Md . , were also on the brief for appellant . Mr. William H. Willcox , Asst . U. S. Atty . , with whom Messrs . David C. Acheson , U. S. Atty . , and Frank ...
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
action Affirmed agree agreement alleged amended amount appellant appellee application Attorney Atty authority Bank basis Board brief cause charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 317 City claim Company conduct considered contract conviction corporation counsel counts Court of Appeals Criminal Decided decision defendant denied determination direct dismissed District Court effect employees entered error evidence fact Federal filed Government hearing held hold indictment interest issue judgment jury L.Ed Labor Relations liability March matter meaning ment motion negligence NUMBER officer operation opinion parties patent payment person petition plaintiff present prior proceedings question reason received record respect result rule S.Ct schools statement statute suit supra testimony tion tort trial Union United violation Washington witness York