Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 71
Página 227
per cent of the employees in the affected unit favored Union representation . A representation hearing was scheduled by the Board for September 27 , 1961 . Thereafter , approximately thirteen employees voluntarily advised Kress ...
per cent of the employees in the affected unit favored Union representation . A representation hearing was scheduled by the Board for September 27 , 1961 . Thereafter , approximately thirteen employees voluntarily advised Kress ...
Página 862
Labor Relations 594 One of best ways to determine whether employer has coerced employee in exercise of ... union as exclusive representa- tive of employees is in issue , evidence known to employer that union is employ- ing strong - arm ...
Labor Relations 594 One of best ways to determine whether employer has coerced employee in exercise of ... union as exclusive representa- tive of employees is in issue , evidence known to employer that union is employ- ing strong - arm ...
Página 1008
Number of hours which employee puts in on a job will not of itself be decisive of inclusion or exclusion from a given unit ... has that requisite community of in- terest with other employees in pertinent unit to warrant his inclusion .
Number of hours which employee puts in on a job will not of itself be decisive of inclusion or exclusion from a given unit ... has that requisite community of in- terest with other employees in pertinent unit to warrant his inclusion .
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
action Affirmed agree agreement alleged amended amount appellant appellee application Attorney Atty authority Bank basis Board brief cause charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 317 City claim Company conduct considered contract conviction corporation counsel counts Court of Appeals Criminal Decided decision defendant denied determination direct dismissed District Court effect employees entered error evidence fact Federal filed Government hearing held hold indictment interest issue judgment jury L.Ed Labor Relations liability March matter meaning ment motion negligence NUMBER officer operation opinion parties patent payment person petition plaintiff present prior proceedings question reason received record respect result rule S.Ct schools statement statute suit supra testimony tion tort trial Union United violation Washington witness York