| United States. Supreme Court - 1940 - 894 páginas
...previous order or (2) upon motion permit the act to be done after the expiration of the specified period where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect; but it may not enlarge the period for taking any action under Rule 59, except as stated in subdivision... | |
| United States - 1927 - 500 páginas
...before the expiration of the period originally prescribed or as extended by a previous order, or (2) upon motion made after the expiration of the specified...failure to act was the result of excusable neglect, but it shall not extend the time for serving and filing the notice of contest under section 382 of this... | |
| United States. U.S. Congress. House. Committee on the judiciary - 1938 - 174 páginas
...previous order or (2) upon motion permit the act to be done after the expiration of the specified period where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect; but it may not enlarge the period for taking any action under rule 59, except as stated in subdivision... | |
| United States. Supreme Court, Palmer Daniel Edmunds - 1938 - 782 páginas
...previous order or (2) upon motion permit the act to be done after the expiration of the specified period where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect; but it may not enlarge the period for taking any action under Rule 59, except as stated in subdivision... | |
| United States - 1971 - 1384 páginas
...before the expiration of the period originally prescribed or as extended by a previous order or (S) upon motion made after the expiration of the specified...failure to act was the result of excusable neglect; but it may not extend the time for taking any action under Rules 50(b), 52(b). 59 (b), (d) and <e), and... | |
| United States - 1988 - 1350 páginas
...before the expiration of the period originally prescribed or as extended by a previous order or (2) on motion made after the expiration of the specified...failure to act was the result of excusable neglect. (2) Enlargement Not Permitted. The court may not enlarge the time for taking action under Rule ' 1007(d),... | |
| United States. District Courts, United States. Supreme Court - 1944 - 100 páginas
...order or (2) upon motion permit the act to be done after the expiration of the specified period if the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect ; but the court may not enlarge the period for taking any action under Rules 33, 34 and 35, except as otherwise... | |
| United States. District Courts - 1947 - 56 páginas
...before the •expiration of the period originally prescribed or .as extended by a previous order or (2) upon motion made after the expiration of the specified...failure to act was the result of excusable neglect; but it may not extend the time for taking any action under rules 25, 50 (b), 52 (b), 59 (b), (d) and (e),... | |
| |