The American Revolution of 1800
Knopf, 1974 - 468 páginas
In this brilliant historical classic, Dan Sisson argues that Thomas Jefferson thought democratic revolutions would be necessary from time to time to break the grip of autocratic factions on the government. That is how Jefferson saw the election of 1800—and the lessons for today couldn’t be more obvious. Most historians celebrate Jefferson’s victory over Adams in 1800 as the beginning of the two-party system, but Jefferson would have been horrified by this interpretation. Drawing on the understanding of faction, revolution, and conspiracy reflected in the writings of the Founders, Sisson makes it clear that they, like Jefferson, envisioned essentially a nonparty state. Jefferson believed his election was a peaceful revolution by the American people overturning an elitist faction that was stamping out cherished constitutional rights and trying to transform our young democracy into an authoritarian state. It was a transfer of power back to the people, not a change of parties. Sisson maintains Jefferson would regard our current two-party system as a repudiation of his theory of revolution and his earnest desire that the people as a whole, not any faction or clique, would triumph in government. The ideals of the American Revolution were in danger until this “Revolution of 1800,” to which we owe the preservation of many of our key rights.
Resultados 1-3 de 87
in more than constitutional terms . Judging the temper of a revolutionary state in 1789 , he described this scene : “ The gay and thoughtless Paris is now become a furnace of Politics . All the world is run politically mad .
The exact nature of the crisis was found in the High Federalists ' attacks upon the constitution . The administration was plainly acting in a manner that violated the principles of freedom and republicanism , or so Jefferson and his ...
It is very uncommon to see the Constitution attacked , openly violated ; it is against silent and slow attacks , that a ... to shew from history , how states have entirely changed their nature and lost their original constitutions .
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
LibraryThing ReviewCrítica de los usuarios - wagner.sarah35 - LibraryThing
A very academic history, in which the author spends a great deal of time defining what "revolution" and "faction" meant to the typical 18th-century person. Once the reader is thoroughly convinced of ... Leer comentario completo
A Note on the Historians
The Idea of a NonParty State
The Idea of Revolution
Derechos de autor
Otras 6 secciones no mostradas