...individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the representative for the Government. § 22.34 Evidence. (a) The ALJ shall determine the admissibility...prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of § 22.32 Office of the Secretary of Labor undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence....

...individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the representative for the Government. §521.34 Evidence. (a) The ALJ shall determine the admissibility...of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by consideration of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. (e) Although relevant,...

...individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the representative for the Government. § 521.34 Evidence. (a) The ALJ shall determine the admissibility...of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by consideration of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. (e) Although relevant,...

...individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the representative for the Government. §35.34 Evidence. (a) The ALJ shall determine the admissibility...by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the §35.32 §35.38 issues, or by considerations of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative...

...representative for the Government. §79.34 Evidence. (a) The ALJ shall determine the admlsslblllty of evidence. (b) Except as provided In this part,...by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the 45 CFR Subtitle A (10-1-98 Edition} issues, or by considerations of undue delay or needless presentation...

...bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, the ALJ may apply the Federal Rules of Evidence if appropriate, eg, to exclude unreliable evidence. (c)...be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighted by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue...

...shall not be bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, the ALJ may apply the Federal Bules oí Evidence where appropriate, eg, to exclude unreliable...relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value ie substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations...

...bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, the ALJ may apply the Federal Rules of Evidence if appropriate, eg, to exclude unreliable evidence. (c)...be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighted by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue...

...Federal Rules of Evidence. However, not all relevant evidence is admissible. For example, even though relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by consideration of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of...

...issues or misleading the jury. Consequently, in a single sentence in Rule 403, it is provided that "although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its...danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues or misleads the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of...