or persons to engage in any such planned common course of action, or to become a party to any such understanding, agreement, combination, or conspiracy. § 32.12

Prohibited sales below cost.

(a) The practice of selling products of the industry at a price less than the cost thereof to the seller, with the purpose or intent, and where the effect is, or where there is a reasonable probability that the effect will be, to substantially injure, suppress, or stifle competition or tend to create a monopoly, is an unfair trade practice.

(b) This section is not to be construed as prohibiting all sales below cost, but only such selling below the seller's cost as is resorted to and pursued with the wrongful intent or purpose referred to and where the effect is, or where there is a reasonable probability that the effect will be, to substantially injure, suppress, or stifle competition or to create a monopoly. Among the situations in which the requisite purpose or intent would ordinarily be lacking are cases in which such sales were: (1) of seasonal goods near the conclusion of the season; (2) of obsolescent goods; (3) made under judicial process; or (4) made in bona fide discontinuance of business in the goods concerned.

(c) As used in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the term "cost" means the respective seller's cost and not an average cost in the industry whether such average cost be determined by an industry cost survey or some other method. It consists of the total outlay or expenditure by the seller in the acquisition, production, and distribution of the products involved, and comprises all elements of cost such as labor, material, depreciation, taxes (except taxes on net income and such other taxes as are not properly applicable to cost), and general overhead expenses, incurred by the seller in the acquisition, manufacture, processing, preparation for marketing, sale, and delivery of the products. Not to be included are dividends or interest on borrowed or invested capital, or nonoperating losses, such as fire losses and losses from the sale or exchange of capital assets. Operating cost should not be reduced by items of nonoperating income, such as income from investments, and gain on the sale of capital assets.

(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed as relieving an industry mem

ber from compliance with any of the requirements of the Robinson-Patman Act. § 32.13 Prohibited discrimination.”

(a) Prohibited discriminatory prices, rebates, refunds, discounts, credits, etc., which effect unlawful price discrimination. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to grant or allow, secretly or openly, directly or indirectly, any rebate, refund, discount, credit, or other form of price differential, where such rebate, refund, discount, credit, or other form of price differential, effects a discrimination in price between different purchasers of goods of like grade and quality, where either or any of the purchases involved therein are in commerce, and where the effect therof may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce, or to injure, destroy, or prevent competition with any person who either grants or knowingly receives the benefit of such discrimination, or with customers of either of them: Provided, however:

(1) That the goods involved in any such transaction are sold for use, consumption, or resale within any place under the jurisdiction of the United States, and are not purchased by schools, colleges, universities, public libraries, churches, hospitals, or charitable institutions not operated for profit, as supplies for their own use;

(2) That nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent differentials which make only due allowance for differences in the cost of manufacture, sale, or delivery resulting from the differing methods or quantities in which said commodities are to such purchasers sold or delivered;

NOTE: Cost justification under the above proviso depends upon net savings in cost based on all facts relevant to the transac

As used in this section, the word "commerce" means "trade or commerce among the several States and with foreign nations, or between the District of Columbia or any Territory of the United States and any State, Territory, or foreign nation, or between any insular possessions of other places under the jurisdiction of the United States, or between any such possession or place and any State or Territory of the United States or the District of Columbia or any foreign nation, or within the District of Columbia or any Territory or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States."

tions under the terms of subparagraph (2) of this paragraph. For example, if a seller regularly grants a discount based upon the purchase of a specified quantity by a single order for a single delivery, and this discount is justified by cost differences, it does not follow that the same discount can be cost justified if granted to a purchaser of the same quantity by multiple orders or for multiple deliveries.

(3) That nothing contained in this section shall prevent persons engaged in selling goods, wares, or merchandise in commerce from selecting their own customers in bona fide transactions and not in restraint of trade;

(4) That nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent price changes from time to time where made in response to changing conditions affecting the market for or the marketability of the goods concerned, such as but not limited to obsolescence of seasonal goods, distress sales under court process, or sales in good faith in discontinuance of business in the goods concerned;

(5) That nothing contained in this section shall prevent the meeting in good faith of an equally low price of a competitor, or the services or facilities furnished by a competitor (see paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section).

NOTE: In complaint proceedings, justification of price differentials under subparagraphs (2), (4) and (5) of this paragraph is a matter of affirmative defense to be established by the person or concern charged with price discrimination.

(b) The following are examples of price differential practices to be considered as subject to the prohibitions of paragraph (a) of this section when involving goods of like grade and quality which are sold for use, consumption, or resale within any place under the jurisdiction of the United States, and which are not purchased by schools, colleges, universities, public libraries, churches, hospitals, or charitable institutions not operated for profit, as supplies for their own use, and when:

(1) The commerce requirements specified in paragraph (a) of this section are present; and

(2) The price differential has а reasonable probability of substantially lessening competition or tending to create a monopoly in any line of commerce, or of injuring, destroying, or preventing completion with the industry member or with the customer receiving the benefit of the price differential, or with customers of either of them; and

(3) The price differential is not justified by cost savings (see paragraph (a) (2) of this section); and

(4) The price differential is not made in response to changing conditions affecting the market for or the marketability of the goods concerned (see paragraph (a) (4) of this section) :_and

(5) The lower price was not made to meet in good faith an equally low price of a competitor (see paragraph (a) (5) of this section).

Example No. 1. At the end of a given period an industry member grants a discount to a customer equivalent to a fixed percentage of the total of the customer's purchases during such period and fails to grant such discount to other customers under like conditions.

Example No. 2. An industry member sells goods to one or more of his customers at a higher price than he charges other customers for like merchandise. It is immaterial whether or not such discrimination is accomplished by misrepresentation as to the grade and quality of the products sold.

(c) Prohibited brokerage and commissions. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to pay or grant, or to receive or accept, anything of value as a commission, brokerage, or other compensation, or any allowance or discount in lieu thereof, except for services rendered in connection with the sale or purchase of goods, wares, or merchandise, either to the other party to such transaction or to an agent, representative, or other intermediary therein where such intermediary is acting in fact for or in behalf, or is subject to the direct or indirect control, of any party to such transaction other than the person by whom such compensation is so granted or paid.

(d) Prohibited advertising or promotional allowances, etc. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce to pay or contract for the payment of advertising or promotional allowances or any other thing of value to or for the benefit of a customer of such member in the course of such commerce as compensation or in consideration for any services or facilities furnished by or through such customer in connection with the processing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of any products or commodities manufactured, sold, or offered for sale by such member, unless such payment or consideration is available on proportionally

equal terms to all other customers competing in the distribution of such products or commodities.

NOTE 1: Industry members giving advertising allowances to competing customers must exercise precaution and diligence in seeing that all of such allowances are used in accordance with the terms of their offers.

NOTE 2: When an industry member gives allowances to competing customers for advertising in a newspaper or periodical, the fact that a lower advertising rate for equivalent space is available to one or more, but not all, such customers, is not to be regarded by the industry member as warranting the retention by such customer or customers of any portion of the allowance for his or their personal use or benefit.

(e) Prohibited discriminatory services or facilities. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce to discriminate in favor of one purchaser against another purchaser or purchasers of a commodity bought for resale, with or without processing, by contracting to furnish or furnishing, or by contributing to the furnishing of, any services or facilities connected with the processing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of such commodity so purchased upon terms not accorded to all competing purchasers on proportionally equal terms.

(f) Clarification. The following is presented for the purpose of clarifying the requirements of paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section with respect to the supplying of marketing services, facilities or allowances by industry members to their customers, but it is not intended to imply by such presentation that other methods which assure of proportional equality of treatment of competing customers may not also be used.

An industry member may simultaneously offer to each of his customers competing in the resale of his products the same kind of promotional service, facility or allowance of a cost value equal to a uniform percentage of the sales (or purchases) of the industry member's products by each customer during a specified and identical period of time: Provided, however, That when the service, facility or allowance offered is of a type which under reasonable terms and conditions is not usable or suitable to the facilities and business of all customers, and is offered to any one customer, the member offer each of those customers to whom the service, facility or allowance is not usable or suitable an alter

nate type of promotional service, facility or allowance which is of equivalent measurable cost, is usable by the customer, and is suitable to his facilities and business, and promptly inform all competing customers of the kind and amount of services, facilities or allowances which he has offered to each and the respective terms and conditions under which such services, facilities or allowances are to be furnished by the industry member: And provided, further, That when the offer of any service, facility or allowance to any customer is conditioned on such customer supplying some reciprocal service, facility or payment, a reciprocal service, facility or payment be required in the offers to all other customers and there be an equality of ratio among all customers as to the measurable cost of that which is supplied by the industry member and the reciprocal service, facility or payment required of any customer. The industry member must take every reasonable precaution to see that services, facilities or allowances which he furnishes to customers are used in accord with the terms of his offer; and upon failure of the customer to perform any obligation on his part, the industry member must cease supplying the customer any further service, facility or allowance.

(g) Inducing or receiving an illegal discrimination in price. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, knowingly to induce or receive a discrimination in price which is prohibited by the foregoing provisions of this section.

NOTE: This paragraph is a re-statement of section 2 (f) of the Clayton Act as amended. In a complaint proceeding under this section, in order to make out a prima facie violation, the Commission must show that the favored buyer induced or received the lower price knowing, or knowing facts from which he should have known, that such price was violative of section 2 (a) of said act and not justified under subparagraphs (2), (4) or (5) of paragraph (a) of this section. When, in any such proceeding, the issue is limited to the question of whether the price differential involved made only due allowance for differences in cost of manufacture, sale, or delivery resulting from the differing methods or quantities in which the goods were sold and delivered, the Commission may establish a prima facie case in a number of ways, including:

(1) By showing that the buyer paying the lower price knew that the methods by, and quantities in, which the goods were sold and

delivered to him by the seller were the same as in the case of the competing buyer or buyers paying the higher price or prices; or (2) By showing, when there is a difference in the methods or quantities in which the goods were sold and delivered by the seller to the buyer than in the case of the competing buyer or buyers paying the higher price or prices, that the buyer paying the lower price or prices knew the nature and extent of such differences and knew or should have known that they could not have resulted in sufficient cost savings of the kind and character specified as to justify the price differential.

§ 32.14 Lifting of stocks.

It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to purchase the stock of a distributor or dealer which has been supplied by a competitor or competitors when such practice is done as an inducement to the distributor or dealer

to discontinue handling competitive products and to handle such member's products exclusively, and where the effect of such act or practice may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of

commerce.

§ 32.15 Consignment distribution.

(a) It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to employ the practice of shipping industry products on consignment without the express request of the purchaser.

(b) It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to employ the practice of shipping industry products on consignment or pretended consignment for the purpose and with the effect of artificially clogging or closing trade outlets and unduly restricting competitors' use of said trade outlets in getting their products to consumers through regular channels of distribution, thereby injuring, destroying, or preventing competition or tending to create a monopoly or unreasonably to restrain trade.

§ 32.16 Defamation of competitors or false disparagement of their products.

The defamation of competitors by falsely imputing to them dishonorable conduct, inability to perform contracts, questionable credit standing, or by other false representations, or the false disparagement of competitors' products in any respect, or of their business methods, selling prices, values, credit terms, policies, or services, is an unfair trade practice.

§ 32.17 Procurement of competitors" confidential information by unfair means and wrongful use thereof.

It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to obtain information concerning the business of a competitor by bribery of an employee or agent of such competitor, by false or misleading statements or representations, by the impersonation of one in authority, or by any other unfair means, and to use the information so obtained in such manner as to injure said competitor in his business or to suppress competition or unreasonably restrain trade.

§ 32.18 Enticing away employees of competitors.

It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry wilfully to entice away employees or sales representatives of competitors with the intent and effect of thereby unduly hampering or injuring competitors in their business and destroying or substantially lessening competition: Provided, That nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting employees from seeking more favorable employment, or as prohibiting employers from hiring or offering employment to employees of competitors. in good faith and not for the purpose of injuring, destroying, preventing competition.

§ 32.19 Exclusive deals.

or

It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to contract to sell or sell any industry product, or fix a price charged therefor, or discount from, or rebate upon, such price, on the condition, agreement, or understanding that. the purchaser thereof shall not use or deal in the products of a competitor or competitors of such industry member, where the effect of such sale or contract for sale, or of such condition, agreement, or understanding, may be substantially

(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize any understanding or agreement, combination or conspiracy, or planned common course of action, by and between industry members, mutually to conform or restrict their practice of shipping goods on consignment with the intent or effect of lessening competition.

It is an unfair trade practice for a member of the industry, directly or indirectly, to give, or offer to give, or permit or cause to be given, money or anything of value to agents, employees, or representatives of customers or prospective customers, or to agents, employees, or representatives of competitors' customers or prospective customers, without the knowledge of their employers or principals, as an inducement to influence their employers or principals to purchase or contract to purchase products manufactured or sold by such industry member or the maker of such gift or offer, or to influence such employers or principals to refrain from dealing in the products of competitors or from dealing or contracting to deal with competitors.

§ 32.21

Unlawful interference with competitors' purchases or sales.

It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry, by means of any monopolistic practices or through combination, conspiracy, coercion, boycott, threats, or any other unlawful means, directly or indirectly, to interfere with a competitor's right to purchase his raw materials and supplies from whomsoever he chooses, or to sell his product to whomsoever he chooses.

§ 32.22 Aiding or abetting use of unfair trade practices.

It is an unfair trade practice for any person, firm, or corporation to aid, abet, coerce, or induce another, directly or indirectly, to use or promote the use of any unfair trade practice specified in the rules in this part.

Sec.

COMMITTEE ON TRADE PRACTICES

33.201 Industry committee.

AUTHORITY: The provisions of this Part 33 issued under secs. 6(g), 5, 38 Stat. 722, 719; 15 U.S.C. 46(g), 45.

SOURCE: The provisions of this Part 33 contained in trade practice rules, Cut Stone Industry, FTC, Aug. 18, 1931, unless otherwise noted.