American Maritime Cases, Volumen2American Maritime Cases, Incorporated, 1927 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 100
Página 1153
... negligence of a tug which had been guilty of " errors of navigation . " There had been , however , an attempt to give the tug the benefits of the Act by contract . The sole question , there- fore , became whether a tug could contract ...
... negligence of a tug which had been guilty of " errors of navigation . " There had been , however , an attempt to give the tug the benefits of the Act by contract . The sole question , there- fore , became whether a tug could contract ...
Página 1162
... negligent in attempt- ing to place the barge on the gridiron when the water was too low to keep it afloat , and that this negligence was the sole cause of the accident . The testimony on the part of the appellant was indefinite and ...
... negligent in attempt- ing to place the barge on the gridiron when the water was too low to keep it afloat , and that this negligence was the sole cause of the accident . The testimony on the part of the appellant was indefinite and ...
Página 1164
... negligence was the proxi- mate cause of the injury . The margin of safety would indeed be narrow if two small bars ... negligent in taking the draft of the barge and the depth of the water , if indeed he took them at all . Further- more ...
... negligence was the proxi- mate cause of the injury . The margin of safety would indeed be narrow if two small bars ... negligent in taking the draft of the barge and the depth of the water , if indeed he took them at all . Further- more ...
Página 1189
... negligence , and il was incumbent upon libellant to show with reasonable certainty that he was injured through the negligence or breach of duty of one or both of respondents . Patton vs. Texas & Pacific Railroad , 179 U. S. 658 . In ...
... negligence , and il was incumbent upon libellant to show with reasonable certainty that he was injured through the negligence or breach of duty of one or both of respondents . Patton vs. Texas & Pacific Railroad , 179 U. S. 658 . In ...
Página 1191
... negligence would be that of a fellow servant or a third person . On the whole case it is evident that libellant has failed to prove negligence or breach of duty by either respondent . Where there are two defendants , either or both of ...
... negligence would be that of a fellow servant or a third person . On the whole case it is evident that libellant has failed to prove negligence or breach of duty by either respondent . Where there are two defendants , either or both of ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
2CCA 5CCA 9CCA admiralty Advocate affreightment agent agreement alleged anchor barge bill of lading boat bond cargo carrier channel charter party claim claimant clause coal collision Company Compensation Act condition contract corporation course crew damage decree defendant delay demurrage discharge District Court duty EDLa EDNY employees entitled evidence fact fault feet filed fire forfeiture freight Harbor Workers held impleaded Index-Digest injury Jones Act jurisdiction liability libellant's limitation loading Longshoremen's Act Longshoremen's and Harbor loss Luckenbach S. S. Co maritime employment maritime lien Maru master navigable waters negligence Omoa owner pier plaintiff port proceeding Proctors for Libellant Proctors for Respondent reason recover repairs River rule salvage schooner scow SDNY seaman seaworthy ship's shipper Shipping Board signal speed starboard statute steamer steamship stevedore suit testimony tion U. S. Attorney United States District unseaworthy vessel voyage wages WDNY WDWash wharf York