American Maritime Cases, Volumen2American Maritime Cases, Incorporated, 1927 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 99
Página 1142
... statute . LOCKHART , HUGHES & LOCKHART , and BIGHAM , ENGLAR & JONES , Proctors for Libellant . ARMSTRONG & CRANFORD and HUNT , HILL & BETTS , Proctors for Respondent . HUTCHESON , D. J .: In this suit the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company ...
... statute . LOCKHART , HUGHES & LOCKHART , and BIGHAM , ENGLAR & JONES , Proctors for Libellant . ARMSTRONG & CRANFORD and HUNT , HILL & BETTS , Proctors for Respondent . HUTCHESON , D. J .: In this suit the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company ...
Página 1143
... statute ) which in terms protects an owner from loss by fire happening on board a vessel , unless the fire was caused by design or neglect of the owner . The owner also filed a cross libel for damages sustained as the result of the fire ...
... statute ) which in terms protects an owner from loss by fire happening on board a vessel , unless the fire was caused by design or neglect of the owner . The owner also filed a cross libel for damages sustained as the result of the fire ...
Página 1144
... statute ) , judgment should go for libellant for its loss . In this case there was not only the implied warranty of seaworthi- ness , but an express warranty as follows : " That the said vessel being tight , staunch and strong , and in ...
... statute ) , judgment should go for libellant for its loss . In this case there was not only the implied warranty of seaworthi- ness , but an express warranty as follows : " That the said vessel being tight , staunch and strong , and in ...
Página 1145
... statute , see Hines vs. Butler , 278 Fed . 877 ; also Providence & N. Y. S. S. Co. vs. Hill Mfg . Co. , 109 U. S. 578 , the ground upon which the owner in the Pendleton and other cases was denied limitation of liability , that having ...
... statute , see Hines vs. Butler , 278 Fed . 877 ; also Providence & N. Y. S. S. Co. vs. Hill Mfg . Co. , 109 U. S. 578 , the ground upon which the owner in the Pendleton and other cases was denied limitation of liability , that having ...
Página 1146
... statute applies to this case , nevertheless libellant should recover , because libellant has established that the fire was caused by the neglect of the owner and that he has done this in two ways : ( 1 ) by showing that the vessel was ...
... statute applies to this case , nevertheless libellant should recover , because libellant has established that the fire was caused by the neglect of the owner and that he has done this in two ways : ( 1 ) by showing that the vessel was ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
2CCA 5CCA 9CCA admiralty Advocate affreightment agent agreement alleged anchor barge bill of lading boat bond cargo carrier channel charter party claim claimant clause coal collision Company Compensation Act condition contract corporation course crew damage decree defendant delay demurrage discharge District Court duty EDLa EDNY employees entitled evidence fact fault feet filed fire forfeiture freight Harbor Workers held impleaded Index-Digest injury Jones Act jurisdiction liability libellant's limitation loading Longshoremen's Act Longshoremen's and Harbor loss Luckenbach S. S. Co maritime employment maritime lien Maru master navigable waters negligence Omoa owner pier plaintiff port proceeding Proctors for Libellant Proctors for Respondent reason recover repairs River rule salvage schooner scow SDNY seaman seaworthy ship's shipper Shipping Board signal speed starboard statute steamer steamship stevedore suit testimony tion U. S. Attorney United States District unseaworthy vessel voyage wages WDNY WDWash wharf York