Add Almy v. Winslow, 126 Mass. 342, contra. Add See also Sibres v. Tripp, 15 M. & W. 23. Add In re Wrentham, 2 Low. 119; Garland v. Scott, 15 La. An. 148; Daggett v. Daggett, 124 Mass. 149 (semble) ; Gilbert v. Collins, 124 Mass. 174, 176 (sembie).
Add But see Haddock v. Woods, 46 Iowa, 433; American Co. v. Clark, 47 Iowa, 671; Klauber v. Biggerstaff, 47 Wis. 551.
Add See Taylor v. Neblett, 4 Heisk. 491.
Add Daggett v. Daggett, 124 Mass. 149.
Add Protection Co. v. Bill, 81 Conn. 534; Stillwell v. Craig, 58 Mo. 24, in which cases the instruments contained words of negotiability.
Add Cisne v. Chidester, 85 Ill. 523.
Add Frank v. Wessels, 64 N. Y. 155, and omit the case from Connecticut.
The words "Dorking, Surrey, 24th Aug. John Cogan Francis Thomas Newham, Manager - London — 88 Gracechurch Street, London," should be in italics.
For "8 C. L. R. 933" read "11 Ex. 166," and add Wil. lans v. Ayers, 8 App. Cas. 133.
Add Wakefield v. Greenhood, 29 Cal. 597.
Add Nelson v. First Bank, 48 Ill. 86.
Add Read v. Marsh, 5 B. Mon. 8.
Add Central Trust Co. v. First Bank, 101 U. S. 68. Add in a note to Bishop v. Hayward: Howe Co. v. Hadden
(U. 8. C. Ct.), 6 C. L. J. 446 ; Carstens v. Little, 5 Ill 410; Grimes v. Newell, 7 Blackf. 819; Palmer v. Whit ney, 21 Ind. 58; Oberle v. Schmidt, 86 Pa. 221, accord. .ED.
Add Phoenix Co. v. Fuller, 8 All. 441 (semble), accord
Add Ex parte Yates, De G. & J. Bank. 137, contra.
"270, T numbered 2. Add See also Good v. Martin, 95 U. S. 90.
Add But see Williams v. Obst, 12 Bush, 266.
Add Arnot v. Symonds, 85 Pa. 99.
Add Agee v. Medlock, 25 Ala. 281; Ticonic Bank v. Bagley, 68 Me. 249; Whitten v. Hayden, 9 All. 408; Spofford v. Norton, 126 Mass. 533.
Add Hays v. Hathorne, 74 N. Y. 486.
Add Smoot v. Morehouse, 8 Ala. 370; Hersey v. Elliot, 67 Me. 526; Hughes v. Nelson, 29 N. J. Eq. 547 (semble).
" 894. " 1, ¶ 3. "895, line 16. "447, note 1, ¶ 2. “1, ¶ 1.
For Foster v. Simmons read Murrell v. Jones, and for “585;" read "565, 583."
Add McCarty v. Hall, 13 Mo. 480.
Add Mudge v. Bullock, 83 Ill. 22; Slawson v. Loring, 5 AIL 340 (explained in Roby v. Phelon, 118 Mass. 541); George v. Cutting, 46 N. H. 130.
Add but see Brown v. Donnell, 49 Me. 421, 425. For "Martin 1" read "Martin 2," and change note 7 to note 2. For "passes no title " read "gives no rights." Add Beals v. Neddo, 10 C. L. J. 187; Hogan v. Moore, 48 Ga. 156; Briggs v. Ewart, 51 Mo. 249 (semble). Add Gordon v. Wansey, 21 Cal. 77 (semble); Bradley v. Ward, 6 Blackf. 190; Wilbour v. Turner, 5 Pick. 526 (semble); Grant v. Kidwell, 30 Mo. 455; Bryant v. Rit- terbush, 2 N. H. 212; Newell v. Gregg, 51 Barb. 263; Vatterlien v. Howell, 5 Sneed, 441 (semble).
Add Himmelman v. Hotaling, 40 Cal. 111, accord. Add Van Patton v. Beals, 46 Iowa, 62.
Add Michigan Bank v. Eldred, 9 Wall. 544; Angle v. N.W. Co., 92 U. S. 330; Androscoggin Bank v. Kimball, 10 Cush. 373; Mechanics' Bank v. Schuyler, 7 Cow. 337, n.; McArthur v. McLeod, 6 Jones (N. Ca.), 475.
" 2, last line, after v. add: Watson, 71 Ill. 456; Holmes v. Hale, 71 Ill 552; Nebeker v. Cutsinger, 48 Ind. 436; Glenn v. Porter, 49 Ind. 500; Kimble v. Christie, 55 Ind. 140; McDonald v. Muscatine Bank, 27 Iowa, 319; Douglas v. Matting, 29 Iowa, 498; Abbott v. Rose, 62 Me. 194; Shirts v. Over- john, 60 Mo. 305 (overruling Corby v. Weddle, 57 Mo. 452); Frederick v. Clemens, 60 Mo. 813; Citizens' Bank v. Smith, 55 N. H. 593; Chapman v. Rose, 56 N. Y. 137; Ross v. Doland, 29 Oh. St. 473; Winchell v. Crider, 29 Oh. St. 480; Phelan v. Moss, 67 Pa. 59 (semble), in which cases the defendants, by reason of their negligence, were held liable to innocent holders for value. - ED.
Add Cooke v. U. S., 91 U. S. 389.
Add Bradley v. Mann, 37 Mich. 1.
Add Oates v. First Bank, 100 U. S. 239.
Add Nat. Bank v. Brooklyn Co., 14 Blatch. 242; affirmed in U. S. S. Ct., 22 Alb. L. J. 189; Huddell v. Seitzinger, 1 Am. L. Rev. N. s. 503.
Add See Austin v. Curtis, 31 Vt. 64.
Omit Fulton Bank v. Phoenix Bank and the four cases fol. lowing.
Add Cromwell v. Co. of Sac, 96 U. S. 51; Murphy v. Lucas, 58 Ind. 360; Scott v. Seelye, 27 La. An. 95; Vinton v. Peck, 14 Mich. 287; Daniels v. Wilson, 21 Minn. 98; Grand Rapids Co. v. Sanders, 17 Hun, 552; Bailey v. Smith, 14 Ohio St. 396 (semble); Bange v. Flint, 25 Wis. 544.
Add Doll v. Rizotti, 20 La. An. 268; Farrell v. Lovett, 28 Me. 326; Witte 7. Williams, 8 S. Ca. N. s. 290; Kelly v. Whitney, 45 Wis. 110.
Add Shultz v. Payne, 7 La. An. 222; Waldron v. Young, 9 Heisk. 777.
Add Emmons v. Meeker, 55 Ind. 321.
Add West St. Louis Bank v. Shawnee Bank, 95 U. S. 557; In re Irving, 17 N. B. R. 22; Palmer v. Whitney, 21 Ind. 58; Heffron v. Hannaford, 40 Mich. 305; Pooley v, Whitner, 10 Heisk. 629; Tompkins v. Maden, 5 W. Va. 216, accord. See also Nat. Bank v. Law, 127 Mass. 72; Nat. Bank v. McDonald, 127 Mass. 82; and add Ex parte Estabrook, 2 Low. 547; Freeman's Bank v. Savery, 127 Mass. 75, contra.
Add Michigan Bank v. Eldred, 9 Wall. 544; Blodgett v. Weed, 119 Mass. 215; Tevis v. Tevis, 24 Mo. 535. Add Down v. Halling, 4 B. & C. 330; Greenwell v. Haydon (Ky. 1880), 9 Reporter, 681.
Add Cromwell v. Co. of Sac, 96 U. S. 51 ; Gilbough ▼. Nor- folk R. R., 1 Hughes C. C. 410; Kelly v. Whitney, 45 Wis. 110.
Add in a note to De Silva v. Fuller, Godin v. Bank of Com- monwealth, 6 Duer, 76, accord. ED.
Add English v. Board, 6 Ind. 437; Whitaker v. Hartford Co., 8 R. I. 47.
Add Aurora v. West, 7 Wall. 105; Langston v. S. Ca. R. R., 2.S. Ca. N. 8. 248.
Add In re East of England Co., 4 Ch. Ap. 14, accord. Add Brown v. McElroy, 52 Ind. 404; Howell v. Adams, 68 N. Y. 314; Finkbone's Appeal, 86 Pa. 368. Add Holland v. Clark, 32 Ark. 697; and at end of para- graph, the word accord.
Add Doolittle v. Ferry, 20 Kas. 230; First Bank v. Nat. Bank, 20 Minn. 63.
Add Kimmell v. Bittner, 62 Pa. 203; Byers v. Harris, 9 Heisk. 652.
For "In," in the last sentence, read "See," and omit all after "(semble)."
Add But see Hussey v. Sibley, 66 Me. 192, 196.
Add Dickinson v. Edwards, 77 N. Y. 573.
Add Cox v. Nat. Bank, 100 U. S. 704; Ricketts v. Pendleton, 14 Md. 320; Selden v. Washington, 17 Md. 379, contra. Add Stanley v. Farmers' Bank, 17 Kas. 592; De la Hunt ▼. Higgins, 9 Abb. Pr. 422; Walmsley v. Acton, 44 Barb. 312; Ashland Co. v. Wolf (Pa. 1879), Reporter, 247; and conf. Stephenson v. Dickson, 24 Pa. 148. Add Cromer v. Platt, 37 Mich. 132. Add Bank v. McGuire, 33 Ohio St. 295. Add Swett v. Southworth, 125 Mass. 417; Darnell v. More- house, 45 N. Y. 64; Mauney v. Coit, 80 N. Ca. 300. Same note, T2, line 2, add Small v. Franklin Co., 99 Mass 277; Cook v. Beech, 10 Humph. 412.
Add See Dawson v. Kearton, 3 Sm. & G. 186, 191, per Sir John Stuart, V. C.
« AnteriorContinuar » |