PRELIMINARY NOTES ON REQUISITES
OF PLEADINGS (XIII.)

I. CAUSES OF ACTION AT LAW.

(1) Express Contracts. (Goods sold.)

Allen . Patterson, 7 N. Y., 476,

(1);-Notes of Recent Cases on

Complaint in Action for the Price

of Goods Sold (605);--The same for

the Value, (606);-Secor v. Sturgis,

16 N. Y. 548, (5) ;—Notes of Recent

Cases on Splitting Cause of Action,

(607);-Sharp v. Hutchinson, 100

N. Y.,533, (12);—(Breach of Contract

of Sale.) Albany & Rensselaer

Co. v. Lundberg, 121 U. S.,

451, (16);-Considerant v. Bris-

bane, 22 N. Y., 389, (21 note);—

Nelson v. Eaton, 7 Abb. Pr., 305,

(21 note);-Pope v. Terre Haute

Car & M'fg Co., 107 N. Y., 61

(22);-Golden Gate Co. v. Jack-

son, 13 Abb. N. C., 476, (26);—

Note on the Seller's Actions on

the Contract of Sale, (27);-(Ser-

cices.) Farley v. Browning, 15

Abb. N. C., 301, (29);-Schencke

v. Rowell, 3 Abb. N. C., 342, (32);

-Notes of Recent Cases on Com-

plaints in Actions upon Building

Contracts,(608);-Hosley v. Black,

28 N. Y., 438, (37);-Parry v.

American Opera Co., 19 Abb. N.

C., 269, (40);-Note on Actions

for Breach of Contract for

Services (42) ;—The same on

Actions for the Value of Services

Rendered, the Agreed Compen-

sation, or Damages for a Wrong-

ful Discharge, (609); — (Money

Lent.) Bank of British North

Am. v. Delafield, 126 N. Y., 410,
(44);-Esdaile v. Wuytack, 25

Abb. N. C., 474, (47 note);—

(Incidental Allegations of Fraud.)

Hoboken Beef Co. v. Loeffel, 23

Abb. N. C., 93, (48);-Note on In-

cidental Allegations of Fraud,

(48);-Blank v. Hartshorn,37 Hun,

101, (50);—(Bills, Notes and Checks.)

Spear v. Downing, 12 Abb. Pr.,

437, (53);-Carnwright v. Gray,

127 N. Y., 92, (58);-Keteltas v.

Myers, 19 N. Y., 231, (64);—

Palmer v. Smedley, 6 Abb. Pr. R.,

205, (67);-Cohu v. Husson, 113

N. Y., 662, (68);-Conkling v.

Gandall, 1 Abb. Ct. of App. Dec.,

423, (72);-Chemical National

Bank v. Carpentier, 9 Abb. N. C.,

301, (77);-Cook v. Warren, 88

N. Y., 37, (78);-Pahquioque

Bank v. Martin, 11 Abb. Pr., 291,

(83);-Mechanics' Bank v. Straiton,

3 Abb., Ct. of App. Dec., 269,

(84);-Gfroehner v. McCarty, 2

Abb. N. C., 76, (86);-Draper v.

The Chase Manufacturing Co., 2

Abb. N. C., 79, (88);-Note on

Actions on Paper Payable on De-

mand, (90) ;-Notes of Recent

Cases or Complaints in Actions

on Bills, Notes and Checks (612);

-(Account Stated.) Graham v.

Camman, 5 Duer, 697, (91);—

(Insurance Policy.) Fowler v. N.

Y. Indemnity Ins. Co., 26 N. Y.,

422, (94);-Notes of Recent Cases

on Complaints in Actions on

Insurance Policies, (618);—(Bond.)

Brown v. Champlin, 66 N. Y.,

214, (100);-Bostwick v. Van

Voorhis, 91 N. Y., 353, (103);—

Hopper v. Town of Covington,

118 U. S., 148, (106);-(Contract

for Telegraph Service.) Milliken v.

Western Union Tel. Co., 110 N.

Y., 403, (110);-Notes of Recent

Cases on Complaints in Actions

against Telegraph Companies

for Dereliction of Duty in the

Transmission of Messages, (624);

-(Common Carrier.) Catlin v.

Adirondack Company, 11 Abb.

N. C., 377, (119);-Notes of Recent

Cases on Complaints in Actions

against Common Carriers for

Loss or Injury to Goods Entrusted

to them for Transportation, (626);

-(Royalties.) Dalzell v. The Fahys

Watch Case Co., 138 N. Y., 285,

(122);—(Rent.) Thomas v. Nelson,

69 N. Y., 118, (126);-Hurliman

v. Seckendorf, 9 Misc., 264, (129);

-(Use and Occupation.) Coit v.
Planer, 51 N. Y., 647, (133);—
Note on the Landlord's Remedies
for Rent, (136);—Notes of Recent
Cases on Actions for Use and
Occupation, (627);-(Guaranty.)
Hernandez v. Stilwell, 7 Daly,
360, (138);-Notes of Recent Cases
on Complaints in Actions upon
a Guaranty, (628); - Cordier v.
Thompson, 8 Daly, 172, (144).

-(2) Constructive Contracts. (Prop-

erly Received under Void Contract.)

Reed v. McConnell, 133 N. Y.,

425, (149); (Money Received.)

Southwick v. First National Bank,

84 N. Y., 420, (154 note);-(Money

Paid.) Freer v. Denton, 61 N. Y.,

492, (155); · (Wager Contract.)

Eggers v. Klussmann, 16 Abb. N.

C., 226, (159);—(Foreign judgment.)

Krower. Reynolds, 99 N. Y.,

245, (161);-Notes of Recent Cases

on Complaints in Actions upon

Judgment, (628);—(Money Paid.)

Everitt v. Conklin, 90 N. Y., 645,

-

(168);-(Money Received.) Roberts

v. Ely, 113 N. Y., 128, (175) ;—

Chapman v. Forbes, 123, N. Y.,

532, (179);-Rosenberg v. Salo-

mon, 144 N. Y., 92, (185 note);—

Notes of Recent Cases on Com-

plaints for Money Had and Re-

ceived, (630).

(3) Torts. (Negligence.) Agnew v.

Brooklyn City Railroad Co., 20

Abb. N. C., 235, (186);—Donner

v. Ogilvie, 49 Hun, 229, (187);—

City of Buffalo v. Holloway, 7 N.

Y., 493, (193);-Davis v. N. Y.,

Lake Erie & Western R. R. Co.,

20 Abb. N. C., 230, (196);—

Ehrgott v. Mayor, etc., of New

York, 96 N. Y., 265, (202);—

Gumb v. Twenty-third St. R. R.

Co., 114 N. Y., 411, (203);—Fisher

v. Rankin, 25 Abb. N. C., 191,

(204);-Lamming v. Galusha, 135

N. Y., 239, (207) ;—Notes of Recent

Cases on Complaints in Actions
for Nuisance, (631);-Note on the
distinction in Pleading, between
Negligence, Nuisance and Willful
Act, (213);-Reining v. City of
Buffalo, 102 N. Y., 308, (217) ;—
Mayor, etc., of New York v. Dim-
mick, 20 Abb. N. C., 15, (223) ;—
Hawxhurst v. Mayor, etc., of New
York, 15 Abb. N. C., 181, (225);
Notes of Recent Cases on Com-

plaints in Actions for Negligence,

(633).

-(Conversion.) Berney v. Drexel, 33

Hun, 34, (229);-Notes of Recent

Cases on Complaints in Actions

for Conversion or Replevin,

(643).

-(Deceit.) Whitner V. Perhacs,

25 Abb. N. C., 130, (239) ;—Note

on Distinction between Motion to

Make More Definite and Certain,

and for a Bill of Particulars,(239);

-Notes of Recent Cases on Com-

plaints in Actions for Deceit,

(649).

-(False Imprisonment.) Sheldon v.

Lake, 9 Abb. Pr. (N. S), 306, (241).

-Notes of Recent Cases on Com-

plaints in Actions for False Im-

prisonment, (653); — (Malicious

Prosecution,etc.)Rothschild v. Whit-

man, 132 N. Y., 472, (244);—Notes

of Recent Cases on Complaints

for Malicious Prosecution, (654).

-(Libel.)

Fleischmann v. Bennett,

87 N. Y., 231, (251);—Caldwell v.

Raymond, 2 Abb. Pr., 193, (258);

-Notes of Recent Cases on Com-

plaints in Actions for Libel or

Slander, (656).

-(Trespass.) Sprague v. Parsons,

14 Abb. N. C., 320, (263);-Lang-

don v. Guy, 91 N. Y., 661, (264);

Whatling v. Nash, 41 Hun, 579,

(267) ;-Gilbert v. Pritchard, 41

Hun, 46, (268);—Gunn v. Fellows,

41 Hun, 257, (269 note);-Notes of

Recent Cases on Complaints in
Actions for Trespass on Real
Property, (663).

-(Seduction, etc.) Buckel v. Suss,

28 Abb. N. C., 27, (272) ;—Note on

the distinction between an action

for enticing away and harboring
a wife or husband and one for
criminal conversation, (275);—
Notes of Recent Cases in Actions
for Criminal Conversation, (666);
-Notes of Recent Cases on Com-
plaints in Actions for Enticing
away Spouse, (666).

-(Replevin.) Schofield v. White-

legge, 12 Abb. Pr., (N. S.), 320,

(277).

-(Ejectment.) Halsey v. Gerdes, 17
Abb. N. C., 395, (280) ;—Clason v.
Baldwin, 129 N. Y., 183, (281); —
Notes of Recent Cases on Com-
plaints in Actions of Ejectment,
(667).

II. CAUSES OF ACTION IN EQUITY.
(1) (Accounting.) Ensign v. Nelson,
21 Abb. N. C., 321, (287);—Notes
of Recent Cases on Complaints

in Actions for an Accounting,

(671).

—(2) (Partnership.) Williams v. Lind-

blom, 68 Hun, 173, (292);-Dalton

v. Vanderveer, 31 Abb. N. C.,

430, (294);-Notes of Recent Cases

on Complaints in Actions to

Settle up Partnership Accounts,

(672).

―(3) (Foreclosure.) Coulter v. Bower,

11 Daly, 203, (301);—Note on

Pleading and Parties in Fore-

closure, (303);-Notes of Recent

Cases on Complaints in Actions

of Foreclosure, (673).

-(4) (Partition.) Townsend v. Bo-

gert, 126 N. Y., 370, (311);—Note

on Who May Bring Partition, and

who may be made Parties De-

fendant, (318);-Notes of Recent

Cases on Complaints in Actions

of Partition, (675).

-(5) (Judg't Creditors' Suit.) Kain

-

v. Larkin, 141 N. Y., 144, (322) ;—
Reed . Stryker, 4 Abb., Ct. of

App. Dec., 26, (328);-Notes of

Recent Cases on Complaints in

Creditors Actions, (676).

(6) (Divorce.) Blanc v. Blanc, 67
Hun, 384, (333);-Notes of Recent
Cases on Complaints in Actions
for Absolute or Limited Divorce,
(682).

— (7) (Mechanic's Lien.) Ross v. Si-
mon, 9 N. Y. Supp., 536, (339) ;—
Notes of Recent Cases on Com-

plaints in Actions to Foreclose

Mechanic's Lien, (685).

III. TECHNICAL RULES. (1) (Juris-

diction.) Gilbert v. York, 111 N.
Y., 544, (347);—Wheelock v. Lee,
74 N. Y., 495, (352);—Robinson v.
Oceanic Steam Nav. Co., 112 N.
Y., 315, (356);-Dodge v. Colby,
108 N. Y., 445, (362);-Cragin v.
Lovell, 88 N. Y., 258, (367);-Note
on the question, What is to be
Deemed the Place Where the
Cause of Action Arose, (371).