 the rule for jurisdiction is that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court but that which specially appears to be so, and, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court...  Select Cases on Code Pleading: With Notes - Página 351por Austin Abbott - 1895 - 714 páginasVista completa - Acerca de este libro
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, William Pyle Taunton - 1815 - 722 páginas
...nothing shall MI;.--;KI,LV. be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but that which specially appears to be so; and, on the contrary,...inferior court, but that which is so expressly alleged. MANSFIELD, CJ cited Trevor v. Wall, 1 TR 151., and said that he supposed the general rule would not... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate - 654 páginas
...rule, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jundiction of a supreme court but that which specially appears to be so : and on the contrary,...nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction o fin interior court but that which is so expressly alleged. (See 1st Saunders Reports, 74.) The powers... | |
 | Thomas Potts - 1815 - 836 páginas
...action j but then it must appear, tliat the court first possessed of the cause, had jurisdiction; and nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court, but what u averred so to be. Qibb. 31 1. FOHNICAT1ON, the act of incontinrncy in single persons; for if... | |
 | Charles Petersdorff - 1825 - 848 páginas
...this case, the Bame not being laid to be infra jurisdictionem curia, the judgment is erroneous ; for nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court but what is specially alleged, and laid so to be ; hence, this contract not being laid to be made infra... | |
 | Thomas Coventry, Samuel Hughes - 1832 - 672 páginas
...to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court but that which specially appears to be so ; but, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within...inferior court but that which is so expressly alleged. Peacock v. Bей, 1 Sauud. 74. Wbitehcad v. Brown, T. Raym. 75. 5. In the admiralty court, it shall... | |
 | Sir Thomas Edlyne Tomlins - 1835 - 854 páginas
...inferior courts are to show it at large, because they have particular jurisdictions. 1 LU. Abr. 371. Also nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court, hut what is expressly so alleged : and if part of the cause arises within the inferior jurisdiction,... | |
 | John Frederick Archbold - 1838 - 682 páginas
...rule, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but that which specially appears to be so ; and, on the contrary,...inferior court, but that which is so expressly alleged. 1 Saund. 74. Bac. Abr. Pleas, E. 1. In transitory actions, the courts of Westminster have jurisdiction,... | |
 | 1852 - 632 páginas
...Courts is, "that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a Superior but that which specially appears to be so : and, on the contrary,...jurisdiction of an Inferior Court but that which is so expresslv alleged." (Peacock v. Bell, 1 Saund. 744.) This is well illustrated in Christie v. Unu-in,... | |
 | 1848 - 562 páginas
...jurisdiction of the Superior Courts but that which specially appears to be so ; nothing islntended to be within the jurisdiction of an Inferior Court but that which is expressly alleged ," and therefore the majority of the Court held that the Courts of Counties Palatine,... | |
| |
