WARRANT OF CITATION-continued.
Fiscal specified the year; repelled as an objection to form ex- cluded by the 20th section of the Act.
Second, That the 19th section of the Summary Procedure Act, authorising immediate imprisonment as a means of enforc- ing recovery of penalties in certain cases, applies also to re- covery of compensation under the Master and Servant Act. Holland v. The Gauchalland Coal Company, High Court, Dec. 24, 1867, p. 561.
See APPEAL, No. 3, p. 86.
WARRANT TO SEARCH FOR PAPERS.
Where a person is apprehended and examined upon a regular charge of forgery and uttering, a search warrant may be granted, and documents tending to instruct the charge may be forcibly recovered from his repositories and used at the trial. And it is unnecessary for the prosecutor to produce the warrant at the trial, or to prove the manner in which the documents were recovered. John Porteous, High Court, July 2, 1867, p. 456.
See SUSPENSION, No. 3, p. 57.
WICKEDLY AND FELONIOUSLY.
Every crime is wicked and felonious, and as soon as an act is proved to be a crime, there is sufficient evidence of wicked and felonious intent. Elizabeth Edmiston, High Court, Jan. 15, 1866, p. 219.
1. An indictment charged wilful fire-raising; as also the wickedly and feloniously setting fire to articles of furniture and other effects in any house or other premises, with the wicked and felonious intent of defrauding any individual who has affected the same by sequestration or other legal diligence-Objection sustained, that the second charge was irrelevant, in respect it did not set forth an indictable offence, and the charge struck out of the indictment. Robert Lawson, Perth, April 12, 1865, p. 79.
2. The crime of wilful fire-raising is committed by a door being set on fire, but the fact of a door being charred does not neces- sarily imply that it has been on fire. Peter Grieve, High Court, June 18, 1866, p. 263.
See RELEVANCY, No. 1, p. 488.
WILFUL FIRE-RAISING TO DEFRAUD AN INSURANCE
An indictment charging two panels with wilfully setting fire to stock-in-trade, &c., with intent thereby to defraud an insurance company, with whom the same has been insured. Found irrele-
WILFUL FIRE-RAISING TO DEFRAUD AN INSURANCE
vant against one of the panels, in respect the indictment failed to set forth any interest the panel had in the policies of insur- ance libelled on, and did not state for whose behoof the sums insured were to be fraudulently recovered. Hannah M'Atamney or Henry and John M‘Atamney, Dundee, April 6, 1867, p. 363.
1. The fact of a person being confined as a lunatic patient in an asylum, is not in itself sufficient to render him inadmissible as a witness. James Sheriff and John Mitchell, Aberdeen, April 27, 1866, p. 226.
2. Held that it is not competent to make use of a witness by merely showing him to the jury without explanation, and that having been called he must be sworn, in order to give the opposite party the opportunity of cross-examining him. George Milne, Aberdeen, April 28, 1866, p. 229.
3. In a trial for rape, it having appeared that the girl assaulted was of weak intellect and incapable of understanding the nature and obligation of an oath, objection sustained to her being ex- amined as a witness; but held that a statement made by her to her mother, immediately after the alleged assault, was admis- sible as a part of the res gesta. John Murray, Inverness, May 2, 1866, p. 232.
4. A boy aged six and a half years dismissed from the witness- box, the Court being of opinion that he could not be made to understand rightly the duty of telling the truth. Walter M'Beth, High Court, March 4, 1867, p. 353.
See EVIDENCE, No. 7, AND PRECOGNITION, p. 300.
WRITING AND SENDING THREATENING LETTERS. Writing and sending threatening letters is a crime, whatever may have been the motive. Elizabeth Edmiston, High Court, Jan. 15, 1866, p. 219.
« AnteriorContinuar » |