100 American Shipbuilding Yard, Buffalo, N.Y. Resumption of dispute with Isbrandtsen. (2) 200 70,000 105 70,000 70,000 375 125 40 do. MEBA.. May 16 (3) 120 (Continuation of Dec. 24 strike; ended on Jan. 25, 1963; see above.) North Carolina State docks, Wilmington, N.C. North Carolina State docks, Morehead City, N.C. SS Dearborn, Brooklyn, N.Y.; MMP picketed due to AMO (MEBA) manning of NS Savannah, Galveston; engineers refuse to sail; implement resignations of Nov. 90 SS P. & T. Forester, P. & T. Navigator at New Orleans; ships transferred by sale At Marcus Hook, Pa.; SS. Sinclair Texas delivered by shipbuilders; unions delayed Alabama Drydock & Shipbuilding, Mobile; wildcat strike. Welders returned to Port of New York; UMD Local 333 (NMU) pickets set out against ships of Sea-land Port of New York; machinists strike against 16 New York ship repair firms; 1 MSTS Port of New York; Norwegian-American Line pier; wildcat strike of 4 gangs; issues 52-323-65-7 See footnotes at end of table. Summary of strikes and work stoppages, maritime industry, from 1945-64-Continued SS Point Vincente (tanker) picketed by MMP (Pac) due to mates supplied by TOA, SS Christopher at Baltimore picketed by MMP due to deck officers supplied by AMO, SS President Wilson at San Francisco, MEBA refuses to sign-on until pension demands SS Columbia, picketed by MMP due to mates supplied by AMO (MEBA affiliate), New York Shipbuilding Corp., boilermakers in wildcat walkout due to employer's NMU charge 4 Colonial Tankers sold to Western Tankers, Inc. (Isbrandt. Sub.) New York office workers picket French Line; no ships in port. Strike action extended Pier 97, NR, New York, 2 gangs stage wildcate walkout due to pier superintendent's SS Inger (Reynolds Aluminum) at Galveston, picketed by MEBA claiming 75 MEBA SS Walter Rice (Reynolds Aluminum) at Longview, Wash., picketed by MEBA limited to elevator, foreign-flag ship SS Jupiter sails November 12 without loading; Galveston, grain samplers ILA local 1849, contract expiration; longshoremen honor Galveston, pickets protest wage scale in city contracts for pier renovation work; all 1,500 Philadelphia, longshoremen protest location of new hiring center, 14 ships affected. SS Mormacargo at Pascagoula; engineers dispute mechanized ship duties, refuse to SS Margaret Brown (Bloomfield) at Beaumont, engineers cause 33-hour work stoppage 1 Includes related idleness, seamen strikers only, approximately 70,000. MEBA picketing caused some dislocations in American Export operations of former Isbrandtsen ships and also some AEL ships. No loss in shipboard employment; approximately 300 longshoremen affected along several Brooklyn piers for sporadic periods. 3 Indefinite. Varied. & MEBA. • To date. 7 MMP/ARA, Source: Maritime Administration. The longshore strike commenced January 11, 1965, affecting all Atlantic and Gulf ports. The settlement of local agreements caused longshore activity to be resumed on various dates during February and March. Source: Maritime Administration, Office of Statistics, Division of Labor Data. Senator LAUSCHE. I understand that. But you are interested in keeping our flagships sailing; aren't you? Admiral HARLLEE. We are, absolutely. Senator LAUSCHE. Do you have an opinion as to whether or not those repeated shutdowns place our merchant marine at a disadvantage with the foreign-flag carriers? Admiral HARLLEE. That is a question to which there can only be one answer, Senator. However, there are other sides to a question like that. The answer is that naturally it hurts the American merchant marine, but the question is, on the other hand, whether or not the strikes from the labor union's point of view are justified and warranted, and that question has gotten attention repeatedly from the President himself. The President appointed Senator Morse, on one occasion, in the matter of a longshoreman's strike, and two other mediators to settle a strike-it has been a matter that has affected the national interest. Of course, it hurts to shut the merchant marine down, but the question is whether the labor unions are justified and whether the demands are justified. Senator LAUSCHE. One of your primary functions is to promote the growth of our merchant marine; is that correct? Admiral HARLLEE. No; that is not correct, Senator. Our primary function is to prevent discrimination in any, unjust and unfair discrimination in any way, shape or form in our trade and commerce. In other words, American trade and commerce is our primary function. The promotion of the American merchant marine was deliberately, definitely, and positively cut off into the Maritime Administration of the Department of Commerce. And the regulatory functions, which have to do with trade and commerce, were separated and assigned to the Federal Maritime Commission in Reorganization Plan 7 of 1961. There was a definite separation, because when those two functions were together, the exporter, the importer, the consumer, often suffered. So there was a separation. But we are interested in the promotion of the American merchant marine, insofar as it helps American trade and commerce. Insofar as representation in the steamship conferences, insofar as services to Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, are concerned for example. That is the part we are interested in. Therefore, we are interested in the promotion of it, but Senator LAUSCHE. We can stop right there. You are interested in the promotion of the merchant marine, carrying the American flag? Admrial HARLLEE. Insofar as it helps the trade and commerce of the United States. Senator LAUSCHE. And being interested in the promotion of the growth of the merchant marine, you are incidentally interested in the promotion of commerce, aren't you? Admiral HARLLEE. Yes, Senator, we are, but not just incidentally. Senator LAUSCHE. Now this question: Has our competitive position grown better or worse under the present program and operation of the U.S. merchant marine? Admiral HARLLEE. Over which period of years do you have in mind? Senator LAUSCHE. Over the last 10 years. Admrial HARLLEE. Over the last 10 years the competitive position, overall, of course, has definitely gotten worse. Senator LAUSCHE. To what do you attribute that? Admiral HARLLEE. Well, it is attributed naturally to foreign competition. Senator LAUSCHE. And that means that our ability to compete with the foreign carriers has grown worse in the last 10 years? Admiral HARLLEE. It has; yes. Senator LAUSCHE. And that is in spite of the fact that we subsidize the building of the ships, and subsidize the operation of them? Admiral HARLLEE. Senator, it is not possible to accurately categorize the situation in such a manner. There are several parts of the American merchant marine. There is the part which is subsidized, the liners which handle the general package cargo, and that part of the American merchant marine over the past 10 years has fairly well held its own. That is the primary part we regulate. The domestic carriers over the past 10 years haven't done so badly either. They are undergoing somewhat of a resurgence in the last couple of years. |