...determine as matter of law what they include. They are clearly inapplicable to practices never heretofore regarded as opposed to good morals because characterized...because of their dangerous tendency unduly to hinder competiticn or create monopoly. The act was certainly not intended to fetter free and fair competition...

...method of competition," as used in the Act, " are clearly inapplicable to practices never heretofore regarded as opposed to good morals because characterized...oppression, or as against public policy because of their danferous tendency unduly to hinder competition or create monopoly." 'ederal Trade Comm. v. Grata,...

...practice, in order to be an unfair method of competition, must fall within two classes: 1. It must be opposed to good morals, because characterized by deception, bad faith, fraud or oppression (as heretofore regarded by the courts), or 2. It must be against public policy because of its dangerous...

...determine, as matter of law, what they include. They are clearly inapplicable to practices never heretofore regarded as opposed to good morals because characterized...tendency unduly to hinder competition or create monopoly. The act was certainly not intended to fetter free and fair competition as commonly understood and practiced...

...determine as matter of law what they include. They are clearly inapplicable to practices . never heretofore regarded as opposed to good morals because characterized...tendency unduly to hinder competition or create monopoly. The act was certainly not intended to fetter free and fair competition as commonly understood and practiced...

...Circuit Courts of Appeals.40 Excepting those "unfair methods of competition" that have been "heretofore regarded as opposed to good morals because characterized by deception, bad faith, fraud or oppression"41 and excepting also those acquisitions of stock control in competing companies and those...

...determine, as matter of law, what they include. They are clearly inapplicable to practices never heretofore regarded as opposed to good morals because characterized...tendency unduly to hinder competition or create monopoly. The act was certainly not intended to fetter free and fair competition as commonly understood and practiced...

...used in the Act, "are clearly inapplicable to practices never heretofore regarded as opposed to go6d morals because characterized by deception, bad faith,...unduly to hinder competition or create monopoly." Federal Trade Comm. v. Gratz, 253 US 421, 427, 40 Sup. Ct. 572, 64 L. Ed. 993; Federal Trade Comm....

...Commission v. Gratz, 253 US 421, held that unfair methods of competition include practices which are opposed to good morals because characterized by deception, bad faith, fraud, or oppression, and practices against public policy because of their dangerous tendency unduly to hinder competition...

...or section 3 of the Clayton Act. In the opinion It stated in part: “Certainly the practice is not opposed to good morals because characterized by deception, bad faith, fraud, or oppression” (p. 475). The lower court in deciding the Sinclair case (CCA, seventh circuit, 276 Fed. 686, 687) stated:...