...namely, that of FTC \. Grata, (253 US 421), the Court associated with the phrase those practices " opposed to good morals because characterized by deception,...unduly to hinder competition or create monopoly." In the latest case in which it had occasion to consider the phrase (FTC v. RF Keppel 6 Bro., Inc.,...

...the public against those methods described by the Supreme Court in the Gratz case as — (1) Methods opposed to good morals because characterized by deception, bad faith, fraud, or oppression; and/or (2) Methods regarded as against public policy because of dangerous tendency unduly to hinder...

...interstate commerce, the Court said at pages 753-754 of Law Edition: Certainly the practice is not opposed to good morals because characterized by deception, bad faith, fraud or oppression. * * * It has been openly adopted by many competing concerns. Some dealers regard it as the best practical...

...determine as matter of law what they include. They are clearly inapplicable to practices never heretofore regarded as opposed to good morals because characterized...tendency unduly to hinder competition or create monopoly. The act was certainly not intended to fetter free and fair competition as commonly understood and practiced...

...as a matter of law, what they include. They are clearly inapplicable to practices never heretofore regarded as opposed to good morals because characterized by deception, bad faith, fraud, or oppression, as against public policy because of their dangerous tendency unduly to hinder competition or create...

...of time been defined by the courts to fall within the meaning of the word is that conduct which is "opposed to good morals because characterized by deception, bad faith, fraud or oppression" (Federal Trade Commission v. Grate, 253 US 421). The theory is that when goods "attract customers by...

...formal complaints in connection therewith. Unfair competition cases. — The unfair competition cases are of two general types, as determined by the Supreme...tendency unduly to hinder competition or create monopoly. INDEPENDENT OFFICES APPROPRIATION BILL, 1938 Court cases.- — Statutory provision is made for a review...

...as determined by the Supreme Court in the (iralz case (253 I". S. 421) wherein the Court in effect that the words "unfair method of competition" are...monopoly. Practices opposed to good morals are involved in eases charging false and misleading advertising in its myriad phases, misbranding, disparagement of...

...are clearly inapplicable to practices never heretofore regarded as opposed to good morals becauf e characterized by deception, bad faith, fraud, or oppression,...tendency unduly to hinder competition or create monopoly. Now, because of that finding in 1920 by the court, difficult as I concede it to be, I was rattier hopeful...

...competition and unfair act complained of does not "fall within the general domain of practices 'heretofore regarded as opposed to good morals because characterized...unduly to hinder competition or create monopoly.' " The majority opinion states: "* * * It is then urged that the use in Russia of the processes of the...