...in language to the DavisBacon Act, but providing a specific- penalty for violation, the court held: That the terms of a penal statute creating a new offense...to its penalties is a well-recognized requirement. * * * A statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of...

...in language to the DavisBacon Act, but providing a specific penalty for violation, the court held: That the terms of a penal statute creating a new offense...to its penalties is a well-recognized requirement. * * * A statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of...

...syndicalism' specific. "The Act, plainly, meets the essential requirement of due process that a penal statute be 'sufficiently explicit to inform those who are...their part will render them liable to its penalties,' and be couched in terms that are not 'so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess...

...in any locality; that the term 'locality' is fatally vague and uncertain; that said statutes are not sufficiently explicit to inform those who are subject...conduct on their part will render them liable to its penalities; that the statute forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of...

...requirement of certainty in a criminal statute, the Supreme Court said: February, 1926 Law and Labor those who are subject to it what conduct on their...part will render them liable to its penalties, is a well recognized requirement, consonant alike with ordinary notions of fair play and the settled rules...

...penal statute creating a new offense must he sufficiently explicit to inform those who are suhjeet to it what conduct on their part will render them liable to its penalties is !i well-recognized requirement, consonant alike with ordinary notions of fair play and the settled...

...defined in the case of Connolly \. General C'onttr.tion Co. (269 US 385) in the following language: That the terms of a penal statute creating a new offense must tx> explicit to inform those who are subject to it what conduct on their ptn «. render them liable...

...approved by the Board of Directors." We think that the statute sets up an ascertainable standard and is "sufficiently explicit to inform those who are subject...their part will render them liable to its penalties." United States ex rel. Handler v. Hill, 90 F. (2d) 573, 574. Compare Connally v. General Construe' tion...

...Supreme Court of the United States has said, in Connolly v. General Construction Co. (269 US 389) : "That the terms of a penal statute creating a new...sufficiently explicit to inform those who are subject under it what conduct on their part will render them liable to these penalties is a well recognized...

...Constitution requires. In ConnaJly v. General Construction Co. (296 US 391 (I!i35) ), the Court stated: "That the terms of a penal statute creating a new offense must he sufficiently explicit to inform those who are subject to it what conduct on their part will render...